Andrew Gelman et al.

Automatically tweets new posts from respond in the comment section of the blog.
Old posts spool at

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Rebecca Makkai points out: Fancy three-dimensional sets are easier to construct in books than in movies, but harder to explain
https://t.co/ssE1CkHGQT

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Ted-talking University of California professor asks sex trafficker for $3,000,000 because he thinks there’s a “50% chance” he’ll make “important discoveries” in telepathy
https://t.co/syqZ5Ors0T

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

It’s all about the Super Pacs: How the New York Times completely misreported campaign contributions in the Maine Senate race
https://t.co/bU5lolRGW8

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcher
https://t.co/XLFGfHuGe0

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Herman Chernoff
https://t.co/wK7cZsQqAA

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Reviews of our Bayesian Workflow book from Bin Yu, David Spiegelhalter, Brad Efron, Christian Robert, Rohan Alexander, and Mine Doğucu!
https://t.co/l00dBhZ6si

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

A ranked-choice election in Maine: Using voting data to understand preferences
https://t.co/PZMAE682R6

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Survey Statistics: quantifying uncertainty in ranked choice voting polls
https://t.co/tcILa2ARDX

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

“Making Statistics Work: Information Theory and Bayesian Inference”
https://t.co/BEcRydp1IQ

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

It’s all about the nonlinearity: An interesting statistical example of flaws in a voter impact index
https://t.co/MtLyzOHAtH

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

“Archaeology can’t give social scientists population or GDP, but here are some things we can measure that might be useful for social science.”
https://t.co/U0blOsqUmr

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

“More bad science from JAMA”
https://t.co/mtaPGbOoWd

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

18 Associate Editors resign from Statistics and Computing editorial board: Problems with commercial scholarly publishing, and what does this all mean?
https://t.co/eqjRT5jqYn

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

“A medical journal says the case reports it has published for 25 years are, in fact, fiction”
https://t.co/SJzcrwfdEs

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Is fabricating data worse than fabricating results? Is failing to correct a known false report more or less serious than making the false report in the first place?
https://t.co/Y4fzym8bsb

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Survey Statistics: toy example for energy balancing weights
https://t.co/VRBo7eahxs

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Claude builds 3D Hamiltonian Monte Carlo animation in one shot with anaglyphs
https://t.co/3ZS7P0pV1Y

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Can someone forward this to Carol Tavris, please?
https://t.co/4olP2Rw3gg

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

Turning chaotic sensitivity from a bug into a feature: Using physical modeling and deep learning to alter the paths of storms and mitigate extreme weather events
https://t.co/1RLt4HbVry

[Andrew Gelman et al. @StatModeling]

The NIH wants to “Measure and Reward Scientific Impact and Replicable Research Practices.” Here’s my recommendation to the NIH director: you can start by no longer suppressing government reports . . .
https://t.co/8J1UaQ7I58