@kaminokenR @Goldridgeisapo1 @IFLTV@Tyson_Fury@usykaa @Umar_iFL If the rematch was taken away, then 70:30 just isnโt fair. That would need renegotiated. Cannot expect Usyk to accept that when he has majority of the belts.
@kaminokenR @Goldridgeisapo1 @IFLTV@Tyson_Fury@usykaa @Umar_iFL Now heโs beaten AJ twice since then and holds 3 out of 4 belts, plus the ring magazine belt. But why is he worth the same than he was before he fought AJ? Plus AJ is proven to be a bigger commercial draw than Fury, which is proven by the Saudi saga.
@kaminokenR @Goldridgeisapo1 @IFLTV@Tyson_Fury@usykaa @Umar_iFL Uysk wonโt KO Fury no, if he was to win it will be points, but if he willing to take a 30% split for the first fight he would wants a bigger split in the second fight. Warren said that offered him the same deal Hearn/AJ did, he was the challenger then
@Potter2backup@IFLTV@Tyson_Fury@usykaa @Umar_iFL Explain to me why Fury wonโt accept the rematch clause terms when itโs such an easy fight for him to win? If Fury wins, the 70/30 split for Usyk is irrelevant. Usyk is backing himself, whereas Fury thinks there is a chance he doesnโt win. Pretty simple really
@MichaelBensonn@Tyson_Fury If Usyk wanted 70/30 spilt in a rematch, what does it matter? Fury claims heโd walk all over the middleweight so heโd secure ANOTHER 70/30 split.. If youโre that confident of the win why would you care about any element in a rematch clause? Youโd be the A Side..
@m13998306 @Umar_iFL @AKrassyuk@IFLTV Exactly, fury not wanting to give Usyk 70% in the rematch on the basis Usyk wins the first fight. But I thought it was an easy fight for Fury? Maybe Fury actually thinks thereโs a chance he doesnโt winโฆ