Far too often we see properties/projects for sale where financial feasibility was an afterthought. It's not uncommon that the land residual would have to be $0, or even negative, in order to be able to build these projects. It hurts to see so much time and money wasted.
Financial engineering is the most important concept for someone who is looking to do their 1st or 30th development project. Hiring an architect to design a project through DDs/CDs and then analyzing whether the project pencils is not a winning plan.
Financial engineering steps are:
1. Analyze zoning incl. parking
2. Develop high level concept (units, sf, etc...)
3. Determine target yield on cost
3. Estimate rents, OPEX and NOI
4. Determine soft and hard cost target to solve for yield
5. Give proforma to architect to design
One example of many: The civil’s plan check coordination budget for 2 projects we did in 2020 were about 17% of the total contract. The same scope for our 2 current projects are 33% and 40%. Our plans are better/more coordinated than they were then and it’s taking 2x+ time/$$.
The expansion of ADU programs in CA every year shows a clear lack of understanding from lawmakers on how to deliver housing, and is making neighborhoods less livable. The better solution is to set maximum plan review time/cycle mandates for staff to approve projects quicker.
I’ve always found it interesting that City’s require more and more every year on plan reviews but that they require design professionals and developers to indemnify them from all liability. Implementing self certification and reducing plan review times would be huge.