Stephen P #BIP-110

Pleb

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@V4BTC None of those things are consequential to Bitcoin. Malicious content and UTXO set bloat is an existential threat.

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@Beautyon_ @mattkratter I fully agree. Still, I'm excited for him to not appear in any discourse at all.

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@GrassFedBitcoin Very positive development.

And I think template construction would take on extra importance in a scenario where node clients are more diverse.

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@alanbwt @planvictory Honeypots will be seized (in sly, indirect fashion) if Bitcoin appreciates substantially. The is no endgame for MSTR.

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@saylor So, so ignorant

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@hodlonaut Thank you for your work Hodlonaut, it’s important to us plebs

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@BigpictureBTC The network is highly policed and many rules are imposed. That's why Bitcoin functions as a payment system.

It is permissionless in that it does not discriminate by user.

Arbitrary data must be minimized for Bitcoin to remain maximally decentralized and therefore valuable.

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@mattkratter Great video, thanks Matt!

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@DukeDukingtonRD @SatoshiBagger Exactly

[Luke Dashjr @LukeDashjr]

No, scammers/spammers are attacking Bitcoin; they are NOT bitcoiners.

No, Core is not right about anything (in this regard).

No compromise with attacks, period.

Data already has a proper parking spot: BitTorrent.
But they don't use it, because their goal isn't to publish data, it's to harm Bitcoin.

Everyone trying to use Bitcoin pays more for spam.
More bandwidth, more CPU time, more storage, etc.

There were no pictures until 2025 October.
Core30 added pictures.
BIP110 rejects that and removes them again.

BIP110 is not a content filter.
Spam filters are not content filters.
Bitcoin is not a content distribution system AT ALL.
ZERO content allowed.

BIP110 does not freeze coins.
Nothing about it is forever.
It does not cause chain splits (only anti-BIP110 can).
It is not censorship.
Stop listening to bad actors lying to you.

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@AAStack The system is neutral in that it does not discriminate users or instance.

It is not neurtal in semantic purpose: Payment

[Luke Dashjr @LukeDashjr]

Miner signaling is not community agreement.

And fixing bugs should not require agreement from bad actors looking to exploit those bugs.

Technically speaking, a softfork only needs a strong minority. Pretending otherwise does not change that - it only makes it harder to act when someone tries to abuse it.

Finally, the rules enforced by BIP110 have overwhelming agreement. While only 15% currently enforce it as consensus, all nodes prior to last October enforced it in policy - and most still do.

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@GrassFedBitcoin Thank you for your work Mechanic, it means a lot to many people. Go plebs!

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@LukeDashjr @AdamSimecka Lethal

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@GrassFedBitcoin @DukeDukingtonRD @saylor Very well articulated. BIP-110 is effectively not optional

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@marko_vukolic @realricky Incorrect

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@LukeDashjr @thepowerfulHRV Exactly

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@mattkratter Thank you for your work Matt. The people are grateful!

[Stephen P #BIP-110 @StephenThePleb]

@AlexOf4801 @LukeDashjr @BTCOVERFIAT It indicates that Saylor’s argument is technically unsound. Not just a preference against spam.