"But if there is a God great enough to merit your anger over the suffering you witness or endure, then there is a God great enough to have reasons for allowing it that you can’t detect."
https://t.co/b5RjHCh5vE
This is exactly right.
The Bar is essentially a worthless memory cram of obscure facts and laws, 98% of which you’ll dump and never think of again.
The LSAT, on the other hand, seems to be a pretty good approximation of how you are asked to think in law school/practice.
Non lawyers will never fully internalize this. But most lawyers will.
I don't think too many lawyers, whether they pass the test on attempt one or not, think too highly of the bar exam as an assessment of competence.
And I'm not just saying that because as a tutor of the test, the test is my nemesis or something. As a counter-example, I think quite highly of the LSAT, and I teach that one, too.
@PatandRon670 during club ball in college we were terrible at sliding/diving, so we set up a slip n’ slide, invited a bunch of friends and got some practice in with whiffle balls.
It’s hard to wake up early for the gym.
You need an alarm to get up for work.
Getting up for golf is a bit easier, but the alarm still comes early.
We don’t need an alarm for the @Cubs in the morning. Our bodies know.
Being able to take points off the board minutes after an incorrect goaltending call is one of the worst rules in sport.
Especially when the offensive team would have had a clear bucket/rebound off the block.