Steve King

U.S. Congress, 5th & 4th Districts of Iowa 2003-2021 Author, “Walking Through The Fire” — ‘My Fight for the Heart and Soul of America’ buy at

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Three wise African-Americans: Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Elon Musk.

[Zach Lahn @ZachLahn]

Thank you to the people of Iowa. Onward to November!

IOWA FIRST

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Zach Lahn’s earthshaking upset to win Republican nomination for Governor of Iowa! Move over Old Guard Establishment and get behind the fresh new brain of Iowa’s next governor, Zach Lahn. 👊🇺🇸🎉

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Feenstra is a member of the RINO Caucus. If he can’t get the 2nd Amendment right, what principle is simpler? Property rights? Doesn’t get that either.

[Ryan J. Flugaur @ryanflugaur]

Thoughts on today's Iowa gov race: The 2A really needed Randy Feenstra's vote on 4/12/24. Unfortunately, he sided with Pelosi and Jefferies against a measure to stop Joe Biden from spying on gun owners and other law abiding Americans. Booo!

Zach Lahn (backed by pro-gun champion former Congressman Steve King) is looking mighty interesting! We'll see how things turn out.

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

@BoomerFarmer_ In the full video and the police report and the integrity of Eileen Sailer.

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Rep. Randy #Feenstra, 6’4” Bully & Intimidator of 5ft “little old ladies.” https://t.co/oNbfQpiCuF

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Randy @RepFeenstra on his way to debate @RobSandIA

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

The Iowa StatesMan Endorses Zach Lahn.
https://t.co/ab35OA3ymE

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

It is self evident that Feenstra has NO chance against Rob Sand. I agree with Steve Deace. Votes that go to those other than Lahn are de facto votes for Rob Sand.

[Zach Lahn @ZachLahn]

🚨 GOP Primary Alert 🚨 Steve Deace:

"YOU NEED TO VOTE FOR ZACH LAHN"

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

@MrTrump2028 @ZachLahn Feenstra voted against Trump on J6 electors vote. Feenstra has already let us and Trump down.
https://t.co/mEZniExUWE

[Zach Lahn @ZachLahn]

Honored to have just received the endorsement of my longtime friend Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point Action.

Charlie and I first became friends when he was just 17 years old.

Much of our campaign is centered around the issues he and I both cared about for a very long time.

We have the momentum to win this race June 2nd. Grateful for their support to put IOWA FIRST.

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Benny gets it right!

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

Fun story…

More than any other senator, RINO witch Lisa Murkowski killed SAVE Act.

I am constantly hearing from GOP sources how Murkowski screams and rants and raves against voter ID. She threatened to go independent over it. Thune is terrified of her.

But why is Murkowski even a senator in the first place? She lost the Alaska Republican primary in a landslide in 2010 to Tea Party candidate Joe Miller.

But John Cornyn and GOP Senate leaders stepped in to save her…

Cornyn poured millions into a shady write-in campaign that gathered thousands of illegitimate votes to drag Murkowski over the line on Election Day.

Now Cornyn has LOST his seat because Murkowski refused to back the SAVE Act.

Betraying your base will always destroy you in the end.

Just a reminder that GOP Senate Leaders HATES the Republican base more than anything on earth and would rather LOSE their seats than serve the will of the voters.

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Bruce Rastetter owns Randy Feenstra. Why are there no donations to Feenstra from Bruce Rastetter? Tell me why?

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Yes! My message for decades!

[SueD63 @suz34175]

@elonmusk 🇺🇸🙏📣

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

The closer one is to government services, the more dependent upon them they become. Rural people are more self reliant. LaCorte breaks this down in detail.

[Ken LaCorte @KenLaCorte]

Why are cities liberal and rural areas conservative?

I thought I knew the answer, but discovered that it's a new phenomenon. The rural/urban divide occurred in my lifetime.

Here's what happened ...

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Senator Hirono hasn’t lost a step. She’s as bright a bulb as she ever wasn’t.

[Sami Nathaniel @NathanielSami]

She is not going to live this one down.!!!

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Gilles, je vais démonter ta prémisse de départ, parce que tout le reste de ton argument s'effondre avec elle.

Tu pars du principe qu'il faut une « sensibilité de gauche » pour ne pas laisser créver les gens de faim. C'est l'inverse total de ce que dit l'histoire économique des 50 dernières années.

Les chiffres bruts.

1990 : 2,3 milliards de personnes en pauvreté extrême. 38% de l'humanité.
2025 : 831 millions. Environ 10%.

1,5 milliard d'êtres humains sortis de la misère absolue en 35 ans. La plus grande réduction de souffrance humaine de toute l'histoire de l'espèce.

Qui a fait ça ?

Pas l'aide internationale. Pas les ONG. Pas les programmes de redistribution. Pas la « sensibilité de gauche ».

Le marché. L'ouverture commerciale. La Chine de Deng en 1978 qui abandonne le maoisme. L'Inde en 1991 qui libéralise. Le Vietnam, l'Indonésie, le Bangladesh qui s'ouvrent au capitalisme.

Les seuls endroits où l'extrême pauvreté a EXPLOSÉ sur la même période ? Le Vénézuela socialiste : de 27% de pauvres en 2008 à plus de 80% en 2018, avec une inflation de 130 000% et un Vénézuélien moyen qui a perdu 11 kilos par dénutrition. La Corée du Nord. Cuba. Le Zimbabwe de Mugabe.

La gauche ne nourrit pas les pauvres. Elle les fabrique.

Le capitalisme produit tellement de richesse que même ses « perdants » américains vivent mieux que la classe moyenne soviétique. Un pauvre US a un frigo, une voiture, un téléphone, l'air conditionné, internet. Un pauvre cubain attend du riz.

Ton argument selon lequel « le social aux USA est un désastre » repète une légende française. La réalité : le PIB par habitant américain est de 80 000$. Français : 45 000$. Un Mississippien — l'État US le plus pauvre — a un revenu médian supérieur au Français moyen.

La vérité que la gauche française refuse de regarder : dans un système libéral, il y a plus de richesse créée, plus largement distribuée, et beaucoup moins de pauvres. Partout. Sans exception. Sur toutes les périodes mesurées.

ÊTRE de gauche en 2026 face à ces données, ce n'est pas avoir de la « sensibilité ». C'est ignorer 35 ans de preuves accablantes. C'est préférer la posture morale au résultat.

La compassion sans résultats, ça s'appelle de la vanité.

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

In order to avoid adversity, the Supreme Court also defended diversity in the form of affirmative action in Gratz v. Bollinger in 2003. Twenty years later the Court corrected Gratz in SFFA v. Harvard, 69 years after Brown and 127 years after Plessy, SCOTUS finally got it right. Justice Thomas was always right. @MarkPaoletta

[Mark Paoletta @MarkPaoletta]

Justice Clarence Thomas took a blowtorch to the 8 Supreme Court Justices who established the despicable “separate but equal” doctrine in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 that sanctioned racial segregation.

Justice Thomas says they acted with “cowardice.”

“It could not have taken my Court sixty years to know that Plessy was a hideous wrong and that racial segregation was grossly incompatible with our colorblind Constitution.

The Justices must have known it all along.

The right thing to do, as Justice Harlan spelled out in his lone dissent at the time, was obvious as it so often is.

What stood in the way was cowardice.

The Justices were afraid of the societal consequences.

They were afraid of coming under political fire.

They were afraid that, if they began to enforce a colorblind Constitution, they would have to address interracial marriage next.

So, for sixty disgraceful years, they made American children like me grow in racial caste system because it was easier to do nothing than do the right thing.”
------
Because the Justices used social science (the infamous doll study) to strike down racial segregation in schools in Brown, rather than on an equal protection clause basis, the Court delayed striking down anti-miscegenation laws until 1967, another disgraceful episode.

THAT is why Justice Thomas has criticized Brown. In his view, the Supreme Court should have struck down those disgraceful laws on equal protection grounds, echoing the Declaration’s promise that all men are created equal.

In Justice Thomas’s view, the Justices hid behind social science out of fear of reaffirming the simple truth that all men are created equal and endowed with certain inalienable rights.

This is why Justice Thomas does not give a damn about judicial precedent. He has personally felt the lash of a barbaric ruling and there was no reason whatsoever to give it any deference. And he believes there are many cases like this.

Justice Thomas’s courage to take as his guiding light the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution without any regard to the barnacles that have attached to these documents is why he is our nation’s greatest Justice.

The speech is titled “Remarks on the 250th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence,” delivered at @UTAustin on April 15, 2026. (link below to full speech)

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

America now knows the 2020 election was stolen by treasonist Leftists.

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

This is how easy it was to steal the 2020 election by switching Trump votes to Biden with Dominion voting machines.

The machines and the people who run our elections are compromised.

[J Michael Waller @JMichaelWaller]

This is a historic short speech by the most consequential Secretary of State since John Quincy Adams. @SecRubio

[Steve King @SteveKingIA]

Zach Lahn spent 3 years traveling the world studying what works in education. When Zach was at East High in Sioux City, Iowa was #1 in education. We can be again.

[Zach Lahn @ZachLahn]

It’s time to have a new discussion on education and ESAs in Iowa - a discussion that ends the politics and puts Iowa’s kids first.