Feminism did not "go off the rails" to become man-hating. It didn't develop into an over-correction.
It started there.
Feminism is what you get when you reject biology. It would be like men creating a movement not to work and blaming women for the tyranny of having to produce value to eat.
The only difference is if men did that it would be immediately obvious it was absurd. "What do you mean you deserve to eat without doing anything, where do you think food comes from?"
Remember that time when HillaryClinton introduced her friend GeorgeSoros and his interest to get involved in US elections?
The Internet sure doesn't.
Why?
Because it has been wiped from existence for the most part. Turns out I found a copy of the file I had archived years ago.
Be a real shame if people save and shared this widely.
Christopher Hitchens: ”In 1786, when the United States was barely a country, it was having its sailors taken as slaves by the Barbary states, the states of the Ottoman Empire and North Africa. Tripoli, shores of Tripoli. Ships stopped, its crews carried off into slavery. We estimate 1.5 million European and American slaves taken between 1750 and 1815.
Jefferson and Adams went to their ambassador in London and said, why do you do this to us? The United States has never had a quarrel with the Muslim world of any kind. We weren't in the crusades. We weren't at war with Spain. Why do you do this to our people and our ships? Why do you plunder and enslave our people? The ambassador said very plainly, Mr. Abdul Rahman said, because the Quran gives us permission to do so, because you are infidels, and that's our answer. Jefferson said, well, in that case, I will send a navy which will crush your state, which he did.
Islamic fundamentalism is not created by American democracy. It's a lie to say so. It's a masochistic lie, and it excuses those who are the real criminals, and blames us for the attacks made upon us.”
Let's study the positive and negative impacts of reversing the gun bans and leaving legal gun owners alone .... @MarkJCarney
Positive:
▶️Save $2-$6B for taxpayers
▶️End a divisive Trudeau era policy that had no effect on public safety
▶️Refocus funding to law enforcement, CBSA (borders, smuggling), RCMP
▶️Properly fund the firearms program, actually do all vetting
▶️Win back left leaning gun owners and their families
▶️Prevent police resources being wasted on buyback
▶️Show you’re not Trudeau
▶️Secure relationship with FN hunters
▶️ save the Supreme Court from giving us a win
▶️End the embarrassment of the 6 year failure of the confiscation program
▶️Gain back support from law enforcement
▶️Salvage unity and prevent provincial tensions
▶️Probably win a bigger, legit majority
Negative:
▶️Annoy PolySeSouvient
It's pretty clear what needs to happen ... 🇨🇦
Uncomfortable truth:
Getting sick in America can financially ruin you.
In Canada, that’s not even part of the conversation.
Same human problem, very different priorities.
Healthcare shouldn’t depend on how much money you have.
Full stop 🛑
Bret Weinstein’s analysis of the 80 Ivermectin court cases reveals a mind blowing statistic.
In the 40 cases where Ivermectin was permitted, 38 survived.
In the 40 cases where it was not, 38 died.
Using a standard statistical formula, the chances that Ivermectin had no impact are roughly 1 in 20 quadrillion.
Yet, we were denied this treatment.
This is one of the biggest medical tragedies in modern history!