LOVE spring flowers, animals, soy lattes, sports, beauty, fashion, chocolate, sunshine, clean sheets & more....#RESIST I am a fighter! MS and CIDP won’t get me!
@TheRHPolls@BravoTV@Andy No. He has favorites and isn’t fair. I have watched him from the beginning of his show and he has changed. Has anyone seen @stassi host reunions on Tubi? Maybe she should be given a chance…
@LizMacDonaldFOX I deleted every show that I had on my DVR from my local ABC/Nextstar station. If I can’t watch Jimmy Kimmel, you won’t get any rating from me for #DWTS#DancingWiththeStars tonight
Dear Mr. Bezos:
We don't believe you. At all.
We don't think this is about encouraging news neutrality or building trust or fighting disinformation or competing against indie media.
You know why?
Because you did it 11 days before the election, after your editorial board came to a conclusion and drafted an endorsement, after your senior brass gave a green light internally.
If this were somehow about principle, you could have nixed the endorsement before the general election began.
Hell, you could have done it the day Pres. Biden stepped aside as an understandable moment for a reset.
But you didn't.
You claim major newspaper endorsements largely don't matter in a presidential election.
And honestly, I'm inclined to somewhat agree. I think their influence is overrated.
Unless it's an outlet endorsing their perceived ideological opposite (ex: NYT or WaPo for Trump, WSJ or New York Post for Harris), it doesn't matter a whole lot.
Although it's quite curious you claim to believe WaPo's presidential endorsements are too impotent to matter in elections, yet too powerful over public attitudes to be allowed to continue.
That doesn't make sense.
But it's also missing the point.
People aren't angry at you because we think Harris will somehow lose based on WaPo not endorsing her.
We're furious because you, one of the richest people in the world, bought one of the leading newspapers in our country--a storied bulwark against censorship and corrupt governing--and abused that power to kill the autonomy of the staff of that newspaper.
You have subverted the free press right before a presidential election in which one of the candidates is aggressively totalitarian in outlook, and you now pretend to be surprised at the shock and outrage.
We do not trust you.
We now find it very difficult to trust your newspaper despite the many excellent journalists who work there.
And we believe you either ultimately care only about your own greed OR you are dangerously incompetent regarding the importance of a free press.
Maybe both.
In any case, there's no way in hell I'm paying for The Washington Post while you still own it.
Michelle Obama: If we don't get this election right, your wife, your daughter, your mother, we as women will become collateral damage to your rage. So are you as men prepared to look into the eyes of the women you love and tell them you supported this assault?
Let's get real: CBS News declining to fact check the veep debate should lead us to conclude that Trump/MAGA bullying of the media is working. Only one side is threatening media for telling the truth.
On the pod, @AmandaMarcotte and I dig into all this:
https://t.co/F1bNlYpfAg
Judge Cannon wrote: "Mr. Smith is a private citizen exercising the full power of a United States Attorney, and with very little oversight or supervision."
All wrong: he is a part of the Department of Justice and subject to all the rules of the Department of Justice. That is explicit in the Special Counsel regulations.
Joe Biden
with Alzheimer's
& Parkinson's
& Bubonic Plague
having a seizure
in his sleep
mid-surgery
while on fire
is a better president
than Epstein Island call log fixture
& credibly accused child rapist
Donald Trump.
This is an underrated point.
If 91% of your handpicked Cabinet who saw you be President the first time says “fuck no, that guy shouldn’t be President again,” the rest of the country needs to see that for that flashing red warning sign that it is.