That can lead to pranks, food wastage, and genuine safety concerns. Platforms need a way to block specific users from delivering to your address and a proper grievance-reporting system.
@zomato@zomatocare
Delivery apps let anyone send orders to your address, but what if an ex or someone harassing you keeps sending unwanted items just because they know where you live?
@blinkitcares@zomatocare
Delivery apps let anyone send orders to your address, but what if an ex or someone harassing you keeps sending unwanted items just because they know where you live?
That can lead to pranks, food wastage, and genuine safety concerns. Platforms need a way to block specific users from delivering to your address and a proper grievance-reporting system.
That’s why I wonder:
If the Nano were positioned today as a minimal, efficient, city-friendly mobility solution, instead of the “cheapest car in the world”, could it actually succeed with a generation that values practicality, sustainability, and experience over status?
#Tata_motors
I’ve been thinking about the Tata Nano recently, and I feel like it might have performed very differently if it were launched in today’s market.
Back then, many millennials avoided the Nano because of the social stigma attached to buying the “cheapest” car.
Gen Z, however, seems wired a bit differently. They prioritise experiences over ownership. You’ll see them travelling to new cafés, concerts, and destinations, but getting there using the cheapest flights, trains, or transport options available.
Status signalling mattered. It’s similar to how someone wouldn’t choose the lowest-end luxury car, and might instead prefer something like an Innova or Harrier, because socially, it feels better to be seen as relatively well-off in a modest group than modest in a wealthy one.