Jack of All Trades Master of none! 🔨 /Bagged OTC analyst😂/ Live like no one else so one day u can give like no one else!!! Proud #Trump2024 Supporter 🇺🇸
$NVO is starting to break away from the 200 Monthly MA support level now at $37, there is a +120% gain just to get back to the 50 Monthly MA which is also the 200 WMA.
There is only one place where this is going next
Price is still in the Accumulation - Buy Zone.
$ASTS needed a retest of wedge breakout level last week and now bouncing
Bullish set up remains in tact
Next target is $130
Second target is $173
Current price is: $85
$HIMS price action is fooling no one today
We know its temperament
We have charted this every day for 2 years
The set up wants to break out and run to $40
Just a reminder
If SpaceX is valued at $1.7 Trillion
This means that Starlink MUST be valued between $600-$900 Billion
Meaning
$ASTS at $37 Billion Market Cap could 20 X from here and will be at the lower scale of the valuation of Starlink, while arguably a stronger product
So what’s more attractive right now?
SpaceX or $ASTS
The math on $ASTS at $80 ($30B Market Cap) is completely detached from reality. Look at the data:
Starlink’s 2030 projections are over $144 BILLION in revenue. Wall Street models are pricing $ASTS to capture a tiny 2% market share of that total addressable market.
Meanwhile, $ASTS has locked in exclusive commercial agreements with MNOs covering over 3 BILLION subscribers globally—completely excluding massive IoT and government upside.
Getting a 3-to-6 month delay on a massive structural build is just noise. Buying between $70–$80 is a complete steal before the next 15 BlueBirds hit the sky and the government revenue starts rolling through the tape.
$NVO
Retail have given up on $NVO now as it consolidates above the 200 MONTHLY MA
- It's also now following the US Market (hedge)
- Offers a +4.4% Dividend
- And in one of the biggest sectors right now where people have an issue putting the fork down when they are full.
$NVO can bounce +100% now and still be undervalued
How is requiring a photo ID to vote controversial?
According to Pew Research, 83% of Americans support requiring a government issued photo ID to vote.
Here’s how things stand today:
Only 23 states require a photo ID to vote.
13 more require some form of identification.
14 states (plus D.C.) do not require voters to show any ID at the polls. 👀
Yet we need an ID for:
- Boarding a commercial flight - Opening a bank account - Buying a home - Renting an apartment - Renting a car - Buying alcohol - Buying tobacco products - Purchasing a firearm - Collecting Social Security benefits - Getting a passport - Obtaining a driver’s license - Registering a vehicle - Picking up prescriptions - Checking into a hotel - Purchasing a cell phone - Entering a nightclub
But requiring an ID to hire the most powerful employee in America is considered offensive?
By the way, California is one of the states that does not require a photo ID to vote.
Coincidence? You decide.
$HIMS
- Wedge breakout = +100% gain
- Breakout of the 200 WMA
- Retest of the 200 WMA from above
- Support confirmed on the 200 WMA and now bouncing
- $25.40 level held to finish the week (historical support
- Next will be a move to the 50 WMA at $40
Not difficult from here, the reversal is on.