Strelock

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Johnnyhand @DelusionPosting No you're fine. I'm just pointing out that yes, there should be a sign, but the law doesn't actually require any sign at all. Driver behavior must be to stop or yield, that is the law. The sign is just there to remind people of the behavior they are already required to be doing.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Booze_and_Ammo @tuuu28283 They are not the same. "This is a big hospital" compares it to other hospitals. "This hospital is big" just means that the hospital is big but doesn't compare it to other hospitals.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Sofia50020Sofia No. I need space to work on things that can get messy. Vehicles, wood working, etc. A single wide with a giant pole building on 10 or more acres with a pond would be perfect.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@aroog1278 Are you really this dumb?

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Johnnyhand @DelusionPosting Well first you said the yield sign isn't needed, then you said all 50 states require the sign. Which is it? BTW even 4 way intersections don't always get signs. But again it depends on whether or not it is the norm in any given area. Some areas no signage is normal. Others not.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@KathleenMcdoald @SecretaryBurgum @Freedom250 You're right, paint doesn't reflect. The water on top of it will though.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Johnnyhand @DelusionPosting This is actually not true depending on the volume of traffic etc determined by an engineering study. Some intersections don't require any kind of signage at all. The laws around traffic control devices like stop signs etc have a lot of "may"s in them as opposed to "must"s.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@zonagroyp7 @CaseyPutsch @TuckerCarlson https://t.co/5NRbLerKKy

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Johnnyhand @DelusionPosting Yeah, it's needed because people are morons. Without it people just wouldn't stop. In the few states where no sings on residential streets is the norm I would expect vehicle #1 to know to stop, but most states would need a sign.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@DelusionPosting There's a yield sign. The order is 2, 3, then 1. In fact 2 doesn't stop at all and doesn't have to worry about yielding to anyone.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@RealDrigondii @japan_nobunaga The Japanese government mobilized a "Volunteer Fighting Corps" and furnished them with whatever weapons they could in anticipation of an invasion. Anything from spears and knives to rifles and explosives. Examples of this in action are Okinawa and Saipan.

[🇯🇵SAIGOU🇯🇵郷田剛士🇯🇵 @oidonhagouda]

Bro, let’s stop pretending.

Muslims make up about 25% of the entire world’s population — over 2 billion people across 50+ countries.

Japanese people? About 1.4% of the world. One single country.

Shinto exists only in Japan.

So when people say “Japan should prioritize minorities and be more accommodating to Islam,” who exactly are we talking about?

The global majority is coming to one of the world’s smallest ethnic and religious groups and demanding that Japan change its culture, food, and traditions for them.

That’s not “protecting minorities.” That’s the majority trying to colonize a tiny minority.

Japan has every right to protect its own people and culture first.

If Muslims want to live under Islamic rules, they already have dozens of countries where they can do that. They don’t need to come to Japan and turn it into another one.

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

Let me ruin your June for a second.

Every year when National Gun Violence Awareness Month rolls around, the same people who have not read a single page of John Lott's 13,312-regression peer-reviewed study start posting pictures of children and demanding you feel responsible for deaths you did not cause and had nothing to do with.

So. Let us talk about children. Since they brought it up.

In 2006, the CDC recorded 642 accidental firearm deaths in the entire United States. For children under the age of ten — the number was 31. Thirteen under age five. Eighteen between five and nine.

Tragic? Absolutely. Every single one.

But here is the number that will not appear on a single "Orange Friday" awareness post: 80.

Eighty children under the age of five drown in bathtubs every year. Every. Single. Year.

ALMOST THREE TIMES as many children drown in bathtubs annually as die from ALL firearm accidents combined — including adults. And forty more drown in five-gallon water buckets. The kind you buy at Home Depot for $4.99.

I have given this information at talks and watched jaws drop, because people genuinely believe the number is in the thousands. They have been so thoroughly marinated in "gun violence awareness" content that their perception of actual risk is completely detached from reality. That is not an accident. That is the point of the campaign.

Where is Bathtub Awareness Month? Where is the congressional hearing on five-gallon bucket control? Where is the hashtag? Where are the orange ribbons for the children who drowned while their parents were in the next room?

There are none. Because the campaign was never about children. It was never about safety. If it were about safety, they would be equally outraged about cars — which killed 1,305 children that same year. Or fire. Or drowning. But they are not. The selective fury lands exclusively on firearms. And if you are a scientist, which I happen to be, you do not get to cherry-pick your data based on which conclusion you prefer. Quinn's Law Number Six: facts are the enemy of liberalism.

Now let us talk about what the actual data says about guns and safety, because John Lott ran 13,000-plus statistical regressions across every county in America and the results are not ambiguous.

Fifty-six percent of convicted felons surveyed in a ten-state study said they would NOT attack a target they believed was armed. Fifty-six percent. The deterrence is real, it is documented, and it functions whether or not a shot is ever fired. The firearm you carry protects your neighbor whether your neighbor knows it or not.

When states passed right-to-carry laws, multiple-victim public shootings — what the media insists on calling "mass shootings" to maximize terror — dropped by 67 percent. Deaths in those events dropped by 75 percent. Injuries by 81 percent. States that adopted these laws virtually ELIMINATED mass public shootings within four to five years. The remaining events? They happened almost exclusively in the specific locations where guns remained banned. The gun-free zones. The places we hang the sign that only the law-abiding ever read.

There were between 760,000 and 3.6 million defensive gun uses in the United States last year alone, depending on which of fifteen national polls you consult. A JAMA Network Open study from March 2025 estimated 489,000 DGUs in which a firearm was actually discharged. The Department of Justice's own National Crime Victimization Survey puts the conservative floor at 65,000 defensive uses per year against assaults, robberies, and home invasions.

No dead body. No coverage. No awareness month.

Here is one more number for you: 74. Seventy-four percent of convicted felons in a National Institute of Justice survey said they actively avoided homes they believed were occupied by armed residents. Criminals respond to incentives. That is not ideology — that is basic deterrence theory, and it is confirmed by the people who actually commit the crimes.

I also want you to think carefully about something the Supreme Court already settled. DeShaney v. Winnebago County (1989). Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005). Two separate rulings establishing that the government has NO legal obligation to protect you as an individual. None. You are your own first responder. That is not my opinion — that is settled constitutional law from the highest court in this country.

So the political class that just told you the government is not required to protect you... is also the one demanding you surrender the tool you use to protect yourself.

I want fewer people dead. That is why I know the data. That is why I read the book. That is why I am furious every June when emotion and fundraising replace science and evidence in a "debate" that has actual life-or-death consequences for real people.

You want to honor the children? Honor ALL of them. The ones who drowned. The ones who died in car crashes. And the ones who will never be born because a woman alone in her house at 2 a.m. had no way to stop what was coming through her door.

But what do I know — I am only a published textbook author, a science teacher, a father of four, and a combat medic who spent his career reducing human suffering and who actually read the peer-reviewed data before forming an opinion.

IF you agree:
LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this.
COMMENT below — did you know the bathtub number? Or did the narrative keep that from you? Tell me.

And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.

#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
@JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Truegreta You realize this is a for purpose lining material that has been used for water features for decades right? It's a Rhino brand product. People have used it and it does in fact reflect. Actually it's the water that reflects. Your local lake with it's mud bottom reflects!

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Truegreta Maybe ya'll should just wait until it's done instead of looking at some stupid ass's rendering of a swimming pool in front of the monument. If it doesn't reflect whoever the next commie that gets elected is can spend $700 billion on fixing it.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@RealDrigondii @japan_nobunaga Actually, it wasn't Japan that disarmed it's citizens. It was the occupying US forces after the war.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@japan_nobunaga Nah, Japan lost their firearms during the occupation after the war. The US confiscated military and civilian owned weapons and made it illegal to own them. Then Japan kept those laws. Kind of interesting that the US with it's second amendment got rid of civilian guns in Japan.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@Sarkin_Nigeria @GadSaad Ever heard of Dahomey?

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@9mmsmg The Covfefe permanently broke something fundamental in so many people. I'd bet that's what happened to them.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@KevinKanzler @benjami87637767 @BraddrofliT I mean, maybe house flippers manage to make money by renoing and selling their primary residence, waiting of course for the capital gains timer.

[Strelock @Str3l0ck]

@KevinKanzler @benjami87637767 @BraddrofliT but you're still going to need to live somewhere. Which means another mortgage, or rent. Homes are not generally investments unless someone else is paying you rent to live there. The only winners are the banks and those who find a way to buy cash and rent them out. /2