@janirejoplin@NombreFalso1231 Sabes que hay mucha gente que provoca a los porteros de discoteca verdad? Y que su trabajo no es pegarse con el primero que les dice 4 tonterías.
Y que los de Desokupa no recuperan las casas a base de ostias verdad?
Entiendes lo que es un trabajo?
@NascarFightr@NombreFalso1231 y si eres deportista de artes marciales, de 1 o 2 ostias no le dejas seco a un gordo gafudo?? aunque peses 70kg y el gordo 100
Otro joven asesinado por salvajes que nunca deberían haber puesto un pie en Europa.
Otra víctima de las políticas suicidas de fronteras abiertas que no aportan nada a los europeos, salvo injusticia, muerte y barbarie.
Cómplices quienes les han invitado y acogido. La invasión inmigratoria mata.
“I do this for you until you learn to do it for yourself,” says the American lead character in Citizen Vigilante to the Europeans he is protecting. It is a sharp and memorable closing statement that captures the film’s core message.
Basically, the entire film only works because its central character is American. A German, French, or British protagonist in that role would have made the story feel false from the first scene. Europe has spent decades cultivating a culture of hesitation and submission. Citizens have been trained to wait, to doubt themselves, and to accept whatever restrictions, failures, or chaos the state imposes.
This is not noble restraint. It is a deep-seated habit of passivity and obedience that leaves people in Europe unable to imagine acting decisively against disorder or abuse of power. It also leaves them unable to rise up and resist regimes even when those regimes begin to turn tyrannical.
That Untertan mentality, that reflex of obedience to authority, is part of the darker socio-cultural DNA of Europe, and especially of Germany’s political history. “Just following orders” is not just a phrase. It is a warning about what happens in Europe when obedience replaces conscience.
The United States developed in the total opposite direction, largely because of the Second Amendment and the self-confidence of the American people toward Washington, D.C. That provision was never meant to be a narrow legal technicality. It was designed as a permanent structural limit on government authority.
An armed population was understood to be the final safeguard against a state that might one day turn against its own citizens. In America, this is not merely theory. Americans privately own roughly 500 million firearms, while the entire military and all law enforcement agencies combined possess only 5.5 million firearms. That makes it clear where ultimate power still resides: with the people, not the state.
Europe has no equivalent. Germany’s Article 20 paragraph 4 of the Basic Law offers, almost as an alibi, a weak theoretical right to resistance, but only under conditions so restrictive that the clause becomes almost useless in practice. It would likely apply only after the damage is already irreversible. Too little, too late, as so often in Europe.
This difference in civilizational outlook explains why the hero of the film had to come from America. The character is shaped by a culture that still values personal responsibility, armed self-reliance, and the willingness to confront threats directly rather than deferring to authority or process.
The same gap appears in military and police culture. The United States has maintained elite units and a broad respect for service for generations. Soldiers, police officers, the National Guard, and the Coast Guard are still viewed with pride when they truly protect and serve the people.
In much of Europe today, police forces are increasingly viewed as tools of political enforcement and selective suppression rather than neutral protectors of order. When officers prioritize censorship, speech restrictions, and biased enforcement over actual crime, they lose the moral standing that once came with the uniform.
An American protagonist fits this story because he operates from a different set of assumptions. He does not wait for permission or consensus. He acts when the situation demands it, and he is not afraid to resist state overreach, corrupt institutions, or officials who have abandoned justice. That is very much in the spirit of the American constitutional tradition.
The irony is that German authorities have now increased the film’s reach. By blocking the official release, they triggered exactly the kind of attention they wanted to avoid. This is a textbook Streisand effect.
What began as a mostly European discussion is now spreading to larger American X accounts and beyond. It would not be surprising if even @ElonMusk eventually comments on the case. Germany’s attempt to suppress the film has turned it into a wider free-speech issue.
In the end, the story illustrates a larger pattern. European societies in general, and many of their citizens in particular, have become remarkably passive in the face of rising disorder and institutional failure. Europe increasingly lets everything happen to it. Without real resistance. Without serious pushback.
The Old World seems to have forgotten how to defend itself and how to push back effectively. Whether that changes on its own, or whether the necessary impulse to resist must again come from the New World helping its origins one last time, remains to be seen.
Citizen Vigilante should be mandatory viewing across Europe.
We’ve had years of woke lectures from Netflix, Disney and Hollywood.
Maybe it’s finally time for a film about reality — crime, failed integration and the consequences of mass migration.
The more they try to suppress it, the more people want to watch it. 🎬🇩🇪🔥
Los rojos defendiéndome en este debate hasta que han visto que era yo jaja.
Nunca hablo de mi vida privada y por recomendación de mis abogados, me han dicho que me mantenga al margen de este tema.
En cualquier caso sí quiero hacer algunos apuntes públicos.
👇👇
¿Os acordáis del caso donde pedían al tío 27 años de cárcel por una "viоlасión"?
ABSUELTO.
La justicia reconoce que:
-Lo que ella cuenta no es creíble.
-Se negó a que accedan a su historial clínico, y forzó cambios de fecha del juicio.
Aun así no contará como denuncia falsa.♀️
@Alepipa133@NombreFalso1231 'Ha quedado como un cagao'
Dijo el anónimo por internet que no se ha pegado en su vida jajaj.
Según tú las empresas de desocupaciones deberían estar metiendo de ostias a diario no? Si hacen las cosas como deben, son unos 'cagaos'