@orangewater25@bennyb082@JanMaclenn87091 The absolute failure of your lot to acknowledge any wrong doing or make any attempt at discourse is why we're here.
You've had decades to fix these issues and made no effort.
Drop the smug cunt attitude and actually attempt to engage
@orangewater25@bennyb082@JanMaclenn87091 Please educate me on why we should continue to vote in a government who have only ever acted against our best interests.
@IanHart86830958@ViewfromtheBpod Because Duckett was probably the best opener on the planet a year ago, and has a proven record, and is still scoring absolutely fine.
We've produced one good opener in the past 15 years.
@orangewater25@bennyb082@JanMaclenn87091 ON haven't been given the opportunity to run a country. This is not a hard country to run, we have every resource you could possibly need. We've seen the Labor and Liberal effort, and the only way they could get it this badly wrong is through malice
@k4bukim4n@Savageansi@JanMaclenn87091 Yes, by far.
Is Australia better today than 15 years ago? Not even close. We've been in free-fall for more than a decade in every single area.
@ViewfromtheBpod@NoHotMashes We haven't got a proper spinner. Having Lawrence and Root, who are no worse than whatever frontline option we might go with, is a far better option than just weakening the batting for the sake of it
@noodmastacheeks@476a803ed32c438@FinancialReview No, it isn't. Subsidised renewables when tariffs are placed on alternatives is cheaper.
If renewables were reliable and cheap, we wouldn't have near 100 nuclear reactors under construction worldwide.
@JNSports1 Its a very good attack. It was a very good attack against New Zealand, and a very good attack against Australia, backed up by a very poor fielding effort.
When did we last have a 4 man seam attack all averaging under 30?
@silme47 We've got 3 blokes in our top 7 who have nailed down a spot, but lets drop one of them? Absolute insanity.
We've had one genuinely decent opener debut in the past 15 years.
@SajjadSarwar71@Fancricket12 Thomson might have been higher end of the 80s, maybe the odd ball at 90. The rest would have been lower 80s pretty consistently. Guys who had worse nutrition, worse physios, lived like amateurs and had less biomechanical support wouldn't match what we've got today
@Cric46966 Against a world class bowler on an absolute minefield, hes found it difficult.
If he'd played on the wickets Sachin did, he'd have 20k runs now.
@SajjadSarwar71@Fancricket12 Holding wouldn't be anywhere near Atkinson's speed. He'd be closer to Robinson.
The games moved on a long way since the 80s
@tsanocruz@NikSmudge@cricinfo I'm not throwing him out after 4 tests (5 now). If he has the South Africa series, thats 8. You can't have another Crawley who gives you no runs for years on end.
I hope Gay picks up, but as of now he averages similar to Atkinson with the bat.
@JNSports1 Do people forget how bad England were when Stokes took over? They took a really poor side and won something like 10 of their first 12 tests.
Against better sides, you have to try something radical. They didn't have the skill to compete playing traditional cricket
@TheSonuJaat@cricinfo It isn't a great problem to have - we have two guys who should be batting at 5/6, and have to pick one to bat at 3. We've got no shortage of guys who would make a good number 6
@Yarisgkx8p@dr__dwayne@ausstockchick I'm not indoctrinated. Theres a difference. Not that it would make a difference, some of the least competent people I've met were doing, and likely completed, masters degrees. It isn't difficult