Saul

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@kidpakerot warmr

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@shivsakhuja Me interesa

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@AlertaNews24 los noruegos se ven buena onda

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

Si tanto te importa el problema de la tecnología diciendo boluteces, que haces en x posteando? Un país tan corrupto como Venezuela es necesario exponerlo con lo que se pueda.. te invito a ver el último video de platzi que habla con estadística porque fue el gobierno el mayor culpable de la masacre del terremoto

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@MrBeast 888987

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@TedPillows $ICP

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@ElCuartoRoj0 @MariaCorinaYA callate maldita peste humana.. que las mayorias de muertes es por culpa del recontra maldito de chavez y el como de 40 ladrones..

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@jorgerpsuv Rolotranco de MMGV!!! eres la peor peste de venezuela

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

regresa @MariaCorinaYA es ahora o nunca!

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@MariaCorinaYA regresa YA

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@TedPillows ICP

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@ElonMuskICP @dfinity @DFINITYDev @DfinityToday @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @ICPHUBS @icphub_EG @icphub_CN @icphub_CA @icphub_IN Worldex

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@DrProfitCrypto 72K llegando

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@shayne_coplan Estafador

[Saul @StrikeTrackers]

@SuiNetwork Scam

[Grey BTC @greybtc]

Prediction Markets Are the New Crypto Danger Zone (Polymarket Just Proved It) 🎯

Think memecoins or shady exchanges are the biggest risk? Wrong. It's Polymarket.

Saylor's Strategy sold 32 $BTC by May 31, but Polymarket resolved NO because the filing came June 1, wiping Yes bettors (some lost $500k+).

Same platform where a soldier used classified intel to 12x his money and a Google engineer cashed $1.2M on internal data.

Prediction markets were supposed to be transparent. Instead, rules shift, insiders feast, retail gets rekt.

Full breakdown 👇

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

Polymarket is not just a small crypto website anymore.

It is backed by major capital.

ICE, the parent company of NYSE, has invested in Polymarket.
1789 Capital, linked to Donald Trump Jr., has also invested.
Reuters also reported Polymarket was in talks to raise $400M at around a $15B valuation.

So investors and future investors should answer one question:

Are you comfortable backing a platform where users believe written rules can be reinterpreted after the outcome?

If settlement integrity does not matter, then what exactly are you investing in?

I am calling on users, traders, journalists, and investors to scrutinize every company that funds, promotes, or legitimizes Polymarket until this rule issue is answered.

Where did the written rule say “publicly disclosed by May 31”?

#StopPolyScam

[willo2 @willo2_Poly]

FYI: I fully intend to get paid out from my bet on Polymarket.

I bet $500K that Microstrategy had sold Bitcoin before May 31st.

In fact, they did. And there's no world in which you can argue that they didn't. Where's the money Shayne?

[Vass @Va77ss]

Everyone speaks about the market that should resolve to YES on @Polymarket today

Strategy sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31

8-K filed June 1, timestamps the sale as "of May 31, 4PM ET"

inside the window. first sale since 2022.

and @Polymarket is about to resolve the market as NO because the disclosure hit one day after the deadline.

let's be real about what this is

> $253M in volume on just the May 31 market
> 19,843 YES holders at 0.4¢ right now
> two NO proposals already disputed by the community
> a trader publicly disclosed buying 49,695 YES shares for $35K USDC after reading on-chain activity
> Polymarket added the clarification "confirmation outside the timeframe doesn't count" AFTER the dispute started

paying out the YES holders costs a few million. it's not nothing, but it will be recovered in no time.

most of the winners will put it back into the platform within weeks.

But resolving NO by quietly retrofitting the rules at the last minute costs the one thing prediction markets actually need: TRUST.

> community walks
> traders take the case to court (already happening)
> every future market gets read by lawyers, not gamblers
> UMA's token voting model gets exposed even harder than the WSJ already did

the sale happened. Strategy's own filing says it did.

the only argument for NO is "we didn't know yet" which is the exact opposite of how event based contracts have always resolved.

@Polymarket built something real here.

losing it over retroactive rule interpretation is the kind of mistake you don't come back from.

13 hours to final review. do the right thing.

resolve YES. the next 1000 markets are watching

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

I have decided to speak publicly.

I am 20 years old. I am a second-year undergraduate student at King’s College London.

I am not a fund. I am not an institution. I am not a professional trader with a team behind me. I am just a student who read the market rule carefully and believed the English words meant what they said.

I put around 35,000 USDC into YES on the Polymarket market about whether MicroStrategy sold any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026.

I did not do that because I was gambling blindly. I did it because I read the rule. I read it again. And again.

The rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold any Bitcoin by May 31.

It did not say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31. It did not say there had to be an SEC filing before the deadline. It did not say later evidence would not count.

To me, that matters.

I have studied enough to know that words matter. Rules matter. English matters. If a market writes one condition before people trade, then after the outcome adds another condition through “context,” ordinary users have no protection.

Without adding extra market context after the fact, I still do not understand how this market can fairly resolve to NO.

These 35,000 USDC are not just numbers on a screen to me. This money matters to my life. I cried for an entire night. I felt helpless in a way I have never felt before. I even had thoughts of ending my life.

But I am still here.

I am still here because I realized this cannot just be about me. If I disappear, the story disappears. If everyone stays quiet, the next person will be alone too. The next market will happen. The next unclear resolution will happen. The next ordinary user will be told to accept it and move on.

That is why I started #StopPolyScam.

Some people contacted me and told me to launch a meme coin around this. I refused.

I do not want people’s money.

I do not want to turn anger into another token.

I only want fairness.

I want Polymarket to answer one question in plain language:

Where did the written rule say “publicly disclosed by May 31”?

If that rule exists, show it.

If it does not exist, then users should not lose because of a condition that was never written before they traded.

I am asking journalists, lawyers, crypto researchers, public figures, exchange founders, and anyone with influence to look at this carefully. Do not believe me blindly. Look at the rule. Look at the timeline. Look at the evidence. Then ask whether this is how a serious market should work.

I know I am small. I know I may lose. I know many powerful people may ignore this.

But I also know that if written rules can be changed by interpretation after money is already in, then no user is safe.

A market without trust is just a machine that takes risk from ordinary people and gives them silence when they ask questions.

I am not asking for sympathy.

I am asking for fairness.

I am asking for accountability.

I am asking people to help me make sure this does not disappear quietly.

If you can help, please contact:

[email protected]

Rule before trade.
#StopPolyScam