Stuart Butterworth

Nice Man

[Stuart Butterworth @StuartButterwo9]

@EssexPR Exactly!!! ✌

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

If migrant crime isn’t such a problem, why is the Government going to court to block the release of the data ? ….

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨NEWS: The Home Office have allowed 214,000 migrants to settle in the UK using a scheme that was shut down 5 years ago

The EU Settlement Scheme was shut down in June 2021 yet it is still being used to this day

The home office needs complete renewal, it's been taken over

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

The Government introduced an official definition of Islamophobia — repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — which has had a chilling effect on free speech.

Since its publication in March, the definition has been weaponised — as the FSU warned it would be — to silence those who legitimately criticise, debate, challenge or mock Islam. It amounts to a de facto Islamic blasphemy law.

The FSU exposed that all five members of the Working Group tasked by Angela Rayner, the then — and now newly reappointed — Communities Secretary, with drafting the definition had troubling links to Islamist organisations. These included the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND, organisations with which successive governments have adopted policies of non-engagement due to their extremist views.

It has now been revealed that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government deleted all the responses to the Working Group’s five-week Call for Evidence.

This is shocking. It means the Government has effectively reintroduced Britain’s blasphemy laws 18 years after Parliament voted to abolish them — for Islam alone — and then deleted the evidence that would allow the process to be properly scrutinised.

The public will rightly have questions. The lack of transparency is alarming.

Was there ministerial direction to delete these responses? If so, which minister gave it? What have they got to hide? And could Islamist extremists really have been allowed to help draft this new, state-sponsored Islamic blasphemy law?

Serious questions must be answered.

Read Shadow Justice Secretary @NJ_Timothy’s letter to the Interim Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government 👇

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

Labour ‘lobbied EHRC in pursuit of the Muslim vote’.

The former Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Baroness Falkner, has accused the Government of attempting to persuade the watchdog to accept its ‘unworkable’ definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government attempted — in secret — to convince the Commission to adopt the definition, despite its opposition.

A Freedom of Information (FOI) request has also revealed that the watchdog will not be adopting the new definition, which it has consistently warned could have a “chilling effect” on free speech.

As the Free Speech Union has long argued, the Government has shamelessly tried to use this definition to win back the Muslim vote, which has splintered in recent years. In doing so, it has sacrificed our fundamental right to free speech — including the right to criticise any religion — on the altar of electoral ambition.

Baroness Falkner told The Times: “The reports that the government has secretly tried to get the EHRC — the regulator for freedom of expression — to sign up to its entirely unworkable ‘definition’ shows how ideological they are. They have been warned again and again that this definition will restrict speech and legitimate criticism of a religion or culture.

“They didn’t consult EHRC, which has responsibility for protecting our hard won freedoms and which repeatedly warned them of the implications of this definition.

“If they really want to restrict our freedom of expression, they should come up with a proper legal definition and see if they can get that through parliament, instead of adopting underhand tactics, presumably in pursuit of a Muslim vote which they have, for far too long, taken for granted.”

General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young of Acton, said: “Reading between the lines, it looks as though the government’s adoption of a definition of anti-Muslim hostility was just the latest move in Labour’s long-standing effort to get the EHRC to investigate the Conservative Party for ‘Islamophobia’. So nothing to do with protecting Muslims and all about political point-scoring.”

It has also been revealed, through an FOI request from the Shadow Justice Secretary, that the department deleted all responses to the Working Group’s consultation on the definition. This has increased fears that extremist groups may have influenced the development of this de facto Islamic blasphemy law.

The Free Speech Union exposed at the start of the year that all five members of the Working Group had troubling links to Islamist organisations, such as the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND — both of which successive governments since 2009 have adopted a policy of non-engagement with due to concerns about extremism.

Unsurprisingly, neither the Free Speech Union nor the EHRC was invited to submit evidence to the consultation, despite both having repeatedly voiced concerns that the definition would have a chilling effect on free speech.

This saga gets more concerning by the day.

Read more in @thetimes below 👇

[Stuart Butterworth @StuartButterwo9]

@JohnCleese 🙄

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

Yes, she voted against the inquiry into grooming gangs,
so now she's been put in charge of safeguarding girls

You couldn't make it up

[Stuart Butterworth @StuartButterwo9]

@JChimirie66677 Ten's Of Millions of British Patriots Can't be Silenced!✌

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The modern British state has discovered a new method of control: if it cannot beat a man in court, it will reclassify him as a danger to children. Not because he harmed a child, or poses any risk, but because his words cut against a policy that depends on silence and fear. The case of Jamie Michael shows how far the system has decayed. A Royal Marine, cleared by a jury in minutes, is now banned from coaching his daughter's football team and marked with a stigma that can haunt a man for life. Not for abuse or violence, but for speaking too harshly about illegal migration.

Safeguarding, created to stop the next Ian Huntley, has been twisted into a tool for policing thought. It no longer protects children from predators, but protects the state from dissent. A man who spent a decade building clubs for local boys and girls is treated as a latent threat, his name blackened, his presence "monitored." He is not punished for an act, but marked for an opinion. He is not judged on evidence, but ideology. The British state cannot close the border or deport criminals, but it can hunt down a father who ranted online after watching little girls stabbed in a dance studio.

The sickness is not administrative incompetence. It is moral inversion. The harmless man is punished with zeal while the dangerous man is ignored with indifference. The state has "misplaced" 53,000 illegal migrants and 736 foreign offenders. It has lost them in the housing estates, car washes, takeaway kitchens, and cash-in-hand underworld it pretends does not exist. It can neither find them nor remove them. It cannot track them, cannot police them, cannot even answer basic questions about where they are. Yet it has the time and the will to brand a decorated veteran a threat to minors and bar him from his own child's football pitch.

This is not safeguarding. It is the laundering of political punishment through child protection bureaucracies. The trick is cunning and cowardly: do not criminalise the speech directly, because juries might refuse to convict. Instead, tarnish the speaker by branding him "unsafe" around children. You do not silence a man by proving him wrong. You silence him by making decent people recoil from him. You do not argue with him. You make him untouchable.

A jury listened, weighed the evidence, and dismissed the case in under twenty minutes. The bureaucratic state ignored the verdict and imposed its own sentence in secret meetings. No discussion of the facts. No review of the video. No right to defend himself. No pretence of fairness. A closed-door verdict delivered by officials who answer to nobody and never have to explain themselves. Britain now runs a shadow justice system where acquittal in court does not save you from conviction by committee.

The deeper truth is plain. A government that cannot control its borders turns inward and seeks to control its subjects. When you fail to stop criminals coming in, you start treating your own citizens as criminals. Patriotism becomes extremism. Anger becomes danger. The father who coaches children becomes a suspect while actual offenders walk free and vanish into the country without consequence. The state is not protecting children. It is protecting its political narrative, even if it means destroying the life of a man who did more for his community than any of the cowards who condemned him.

The real threat to children in Britain is not a father who shouted into a phone. It is a government that has lost control, lost confidence, and now punishes those who notice. A society where ordinary parents must watch their words while tens of thousands of unknown men roam unchecked is not a society in good health. It is a society that has surrendered its borders, lost its courage, and turned its police powers inward to hide the shame. The message is simple and vicious: stay silent, or we will ruin you.

"The case of Jamie Michael shows how far the system has decayed."

[Stuart Butterworth @StuartButterwo9]

@BasilTheGreat Great Britain won't last Another 3years!! Globalisation will Finish us once and for all!!😠

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

Andy Burnham has just decided to increase the UK Government's foreign aid budget by £13 Billion

This is a monumentally terrible decision

Foreign Aid should be ZERO.

Even if you believe that having a foreign aid budget is a good thing, it should still be ZERO... so long as you believe in Mathematics

The UK Government debt right now stands at THREE TRILLION POUNDS

That's £3,000,000,000,000

It's roughly 95% of our total GDP

20 years ago our debt wasn't even £1 Trillion, it was £539 Billion, 35% of GDP and people even warned back then that was too high

We currently borrow around £130 Billion per year already and Andy Burnham wants to add to this number

This comes at a price, a steep one, in fact 8% of all Government spending is purely on the interest servicing our debt

We literally get nothing for it, it's taxpayer money that might as well be be burned on a bonfire for all the use it does for us

8% by the way is £110 Billion every single year

For that money we could double the number of Nurses in the NHS

We could double the entire education sector

We could build half a million homes

We could nearly treble the size of our military

Or we could pay down our debt so that the next generations don't have to deal with this

Instead Andy Burnham wants to borrow more, to burden us with more interest payments to give to foreign people who are not our responsibility

We are borrowing money to give it away to people on other continents for free

Absolute insanity

[Stuart Butterworth @StuartButterwo9]

@Nick_Delehanty Karma incoming!

[Nick Delehanty 🇮🇪 @Nick_Delehanty]

Watch Closely
this is How it all works...

Sunday:
Story breaks about Govt's new Citizenship proposal.

Monday Morning:
Govt funded NGOs hit mainstream airwaves to set the narrative as "harsh and unnecessary".

Nowhere is the audience told that this NGO, Doras, gets €1.056 million (90% of its income) from the taxpayer each year.

It employs 21 people, whose combined salaries cost ~€800k.

Expect to hear from all the other taxpayer funded Migrant-rights NGOs throughout the week.

Where is the "Responsible Spending & Policy" NGO??

[Big Time Charlie @shadowcanman]

🚨🚨🚨🤞🤞🤞THE NATIONAL LOTTERY DEI AUDIT: 22 YEARS OF DATA

We are auditing the full National Lottery Community Fund grant record from 1 April 2004 to 30 June 2026.

🚨299,068 grants to organisations
🚨£13,271,464,879 awarded
🚨22 years of grant data

That £13.27 BILLION is the total funding universe we are examining. It is not the amount spent on DEI.

Our job is to identify what proportion of that £13.27bn went to projects substantially connected to:

Race and ethnicity
Anti-racism
Equality and equity
LGBT+
Gender equality
Disability and neurodiversity
Faith and religious inclusion
Migration and refugees
Representation programmes
EDI infrastructure and training

THE IMPORTANT PART: OVERLAP

One grant can fall into several categories.
A project involving refugee women from an ethnic-minority community, for example, could legitimately appear in migration, race and gender analysis.

So we will publish:
GROSS CATEGORY TOTALS
Each relevant category receives the full value of the qualifying grant.

And separately:
DEDUPLICATED TOTALS
Each individual grant is counted only once in the overall DEI/equality figure, regardless of how many categories it intersects with.

That prevents us from turning one £500,000 award into £1.5m simply because it touches three categories.

We are also separating grants into:

STRICT DEI: equality, discrimination, equity or diversity is an explicit project purpose.

BROAD DEI: a protected-characteristic or equality objective is a substantial part of the project.

INCIDENTAL: generic language such as “inclusive” appears, but the grant is not fundamentally an equality/DEI project.

Incidental grants will not be used to inflate the headline figure.

The underlying data is published by the National Lottery Community Fund using the 360Giving Data Standard, including historic datasets extending back to 2004–05 and the latest dataset covering July 2025 to June 2026.

So the starting point is now:

299,068 GRANTS
£13.27 BILLION
1 APRIL 2004 – 30 JUNE 2026

Now we establish, grant by grant, exactly how much of it can defensibly be classified as DEI/equality-related funding.

[Stuart Butterworth @StuartButterwo9]

@andrewc44104127 Why is Everyone trying to Destroy Britain and the British People? WHY!!!

[The English Crusader @andrewc44104127]

Boycott the national lottery!
Do not give them a single penny

They have gave millions upon millions to charitys that support asylum seekers

They are literally funding our replacement.

Traitors!

[Stuart Butterworth @StuartButterwo9]

@David90shaw Why do think she wanted to stay as Home Secretary?

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 YOU PROBABLY READ ABOUT THE LABOUR MIGRATION CIVIL WAR BUT HERE IS THE REAL SCANDAL THEY BURIED!

I am sure you have all seen the headlines this week about the 80 left wing Labour MPs in open revolt against Prime Minister Andy Burnham to protect open borders.

But while the mainstream media obsesses over their internal party drama, look at the two massive truths the establishment desperately tried to hide!

First, former Labour Home Secretary Alan Johnson openly admitted the real reason for the panic. They are absolutely terrified that Nigel Farage and Reform UK will take Downing Street if Labour fails to stop the boats.

Second, while these champagne socialists argue about appeasing progressive voters, brand new figures reveal the Home Office quietly burned an eye watering 185.5 million pounds in a single year just shuttling detainees around the country!

Let that sink in!!!!!

They are spending hundreds of millions of your hard earned tax cash to run a private transport service for illegal arrivals, all while being too terrified of their own woke activist base to secure our borders.

They treat the British public like an absolute cash machine while engineering our total national decline. The mask has completely slipped.

[Stuart Butterworth @StuartButterwo9]

@shadowcanman Ain't playing the Lottery No More!!@

[Big Time Charlie @shadowcanman]

🚨🚨🚨🤞🤞🤞NATIONAL LOTTERY UPDATE: REGIONAL FIGURES

Earlier this week, we published the headline figure from our National Lottery audit from 2021-2026:

£114.7 MILLION.

Now we can show where it went.

London — £499,631
Globe Community Project, Bethnal Green: “Touching Safe Ground: gentle yoga & English for refugee & migrant women.”

North West — £246,225
Afrocats, Manchester: cultural, social and wellbeing programmes for refugees and asylum seekers, including creative programmes, workshops and community events.

Yorkshire & the Humber — £350,739
Mafwa Theatre, Leeds: “Mafwa in Bloom” — gardening clubs, art workshops and community events for refugees, asylum seekers and settled communities.

West Midlands — £326,913
Newbigin Community Trust, Birmingham: a three-year community regeneration project including “Animal Encounters” with alpacas and sheep and a mobile cooking school where recipes are taught by refugee and asylum-seeker women

East of England — £496,460
Ipswich Community Media CIC: “IConnect 2” — courses and engagement workshops for migrant, refugee and asylum-seeking communities in Ipswich and Suffolk.

East Midlands — £250,800
BrightSparks: Arts in Mental Health, based in the Midlands: “Comedy Asylum 2” — comedy workshops, performances and peer-to-peer support.

South West — £129,888
Trigger Productions: “Humanity Hotel” — support aimed at refugees and asylum seekers housed in North Somerset.

North East — £359,564
Teesside Vineyard Church: “Nurturing Families” — workshops, mentoring and community activities, with a particular focus on refugee and asylum-seeking families.

Scotland — £193,127
Outdoors For You SCIO: five years of free indoor and outdoor activities, including access to nature and sport, with a specific focus on refugees and asylum seekers.

Wales — £330,985
Displaced People in Action: “Shaping My Future” — workshops, social activities, wellbeing sessions, cultural information and hate-crime awareness for asylum seekers and refugees.

Northern Ireland — £187,766
Street Soccer NI: activities for vulnerable people including asylum seekers and refugees, covering football/physical activity, walking groups, cookery classes, creative writing and family fun days.

London and the North West alone account for more than £43 million.

And this is still only one funding stream.

There is MUCH MUCH more coming later this week.

More regions.
More organisations.
More funding streams.
More historical data.

The £114.7 million was the opening number, you are not going to believe what's coming down the line...

STAY TUNED.

FOLLOW THE MONEY.