Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@SahlstedtV @GrantR_1867 That’s what a lot of people think because they are thick. Plenty of people think goals that were scored would still have been scored even if something had been different. You think Germany were better. Fine. They were, but equalising not long before half time changes things.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@SahlstedtV @GrantR_1867 You didn’t answer my question. If the goal had have been registered, as it should’ve have done, is it your opinion that the rest of the match would have played out identically. I only ask because it is a provably false position to hold.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@HotTallFatGuy @fcbxSwayam The sensors are in the ball, fuckwit. And if you think they were ‘out of range’, you’re deluded. The ball didn’t hit anything. Get over it.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@SahlstedtV @GrantR_1867 Do you really think the rest of the match would have played out the same way if goal had been registered? Are you really that thick?

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@jeuasommenulle I’ve already told you. I’m ending this conversation. I prefer to not speak with cretins. Goodbye. Muted.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@jeuasommenulle The conclusion you reached from your flawed reasoning.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@Foggeddota @DanWood_Journo I wouldn’t say the video clearly shows it hits a cable, though. Fluid dynamics is crazy. The amount and type of spin on the ball (and the design of the ball too) from the kick will have a huge influence on the shape of the arc the ball takes.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@EuroDale The ball didn’t touch anything before the first goal. That data proves that. Any “evidence” you submit is just confirmation bias. Don’t foul another player if you want your goals to stand. We should have had a penalty. True score: England 3-1 Norway.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@MeDummyDummy @BuckSadlier @ThunderHusky17 Point out fact is entirely reasonable. You are objectively a moron. There’s no evidence the ball touched anything, and it followed a oath determining the by initial kick, gravity, snd fluid dynamics. End of conversation. Goodbye. Muted.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@MeDummyDummy @BuckSadlier @ThunderHusky17 No. That’d be you because you are actually a moron.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@l3d1c You wouldn’t understand the data. You’re too low-IQ.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@and_Prediction @BobKnezevic @FIFAcom Incorrect

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@1nsightling @RobinWigg Couldn’t give a fuck about that simulation. That actual data from ball which detects touches, which is sensitive enough to detect hair, shows no touch. Next.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@MeDummyDummy @BuckSadlier @ThunderHusky17 The trajectory takes a dip determined by gravity and fluid dynamics. It’s my problem that you’re too low-IQ to understand that.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@jisamill Ball didn’t hit the cable. Norway didn’t get those corners as they weren’t corners. You clearly don’t know the details of mouth-covering rule. A foul is a foul, but we can agree to ditch VAR and tech altogether if you really want.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@OscarOve90000 @BuckleShiny @JKul23 “Ask Grok”. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Maybe review the data from the data that actually detects the ball’s touches.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@MeDummyDummy @BuckSadlier @ThunderHusky17 It’s not very clear at all. The trajectory of the ball after being hit is determined by gravity and fluid dynamics. Fluid dynamics is extremely complicated.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@Demosthenesxx @RobinWigg It literally doesn’t look like it drops straight down.

[Stuart Schofield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇵🇱🇪🇺 @Stujka]

@1nsightling @RobinWigg There was no touch. Next: