The comparison of radfems to incels is purposefully meant to insult and discipline women into obedience, not make any sense. It goes into the same logic that opposing misogyny makes you no better than misogynists. Just shows how fragile patriarchal reasoning and defenses are
I’ll budge: the reason soccer is so low scoring is not because kicking the ball into the net is very hard (it’s not), it’s that getting the ball to a player in a position where he has a clear shooting angle is extremely hard.
Three Amnesty positions: sex buying should be legal, surrogacy is a human right, trans women are women. In each case the female body is treated as something available for others' use. https://t.co/ozJPwkOIpv
Une médecin que j’apprécie bcp a rappelé ceci : 70 % des personnes souffrant de douleurs chroniques sont des femmes, pourtant près de 80 % des études ont été menées sur des HOMMES et des RONGEURS mâles.
Corny ass “men are affected by the patriarchy too 🥹” shit, meanwhile you teenage boys are raping and stabbing girls . No one gaf about how sad you are about not being soft. Yall are still oppressors.
real.
also, isn't it interesting how it's always the english (lit) teachers? what does that tell you about the impact and value of humanities/being able to read 'into' things
What is happening in the UK journalism industry??? Why do they constantly do this? I know it happens all over the world but every time I see something like this, it’s in a British article or newspaper. Why?