@SanjayJhaBihar It is indeed a positive trend that politicians should write about the passing of historians and other scholars. Such gestures acknowledge the value of intellectual contributions and highlight the importance of knowledge, research, and academic work in society. 👍
@KraantiKumar@RamanYadav1712 Through intertextual and comparative analysis, scholars have identified that the Arthashastra reflects a compilation of knowledge from various periods, making it difficult to attribute the entire work to a single author or timeframe.
@KraantiKumar@RamanYadav1712 how Chanakya, a shrewd and resourceful Brahmin, helped Chandragupta ascend to power and establish the Mauryan Empire. It is crucial to note that while this play provides a narrative of their relationship, it was composed centuries after the events it describes, which adds layers
@KraantiKumar@RamanYadav1712 The existence of Chanakya, and the historicity of his work Arthashastra, have been subjects of scholarly debate. The Arthashastra itself is an ancient treatise on statecraft and political strategy, believed to have been composed between the 3rd century BCE and the 1st century CE.
@Profdilipmandal Rajyaabhishek is itself a brahmanic concept.
A brahmin was called from varanasi for legitimizing him. Your understanding of Indian social history is simplistic and driven by an agenda of hate. Please read good historians.
@Profdilipmandal@BarackObama According to you only most people views don't count in Hindu religion.see where the brahmanic elite has voted, that will be the varna of Obama, others view don't count in these matters( what I have learned from your views).