really cool games industry CEO trick: you can tighten deadlines, strangle consumers with microtransactions and make everything all digital and you can completely and utterly get away with it by getting loser grifters on x the everything app to blame everything on the woke
‡
Half-Baked Disruption
As most readers likely have heard by now, yesterday CDI and NYRA announced a series of races for three-year-olds, set to begin in 2027, which will include bonuses, etc. It is oddly named The Thoroughbred Championship Series.
I reacted to it in this linked post:
https://t.co/33X4gMmu2c
Probably the most notable aspect of the proposal was the screaming absence of any mention of the Preakness. The Matt Winn, KY Derby, Belmont, Jim Dandy, Travers, and a "Championship" race are included, but the middle jewel of the Triple Crown didn't even get a mention.
What I, and most others inferred, is that this new series of races was, at least in part, designed to marginalize the Preakness. Perhaps the recent failed attempt by CDI to acquire the property rights to that race played a role, but in any case, the many reactions to the omission, ranging from surprise to outrage, should not have come as a surprise to anyone. Which makes the initial reactions of the leaders of CDI and NYRA all the more remarkable.
First, CDI:
"It's pretty clear to me, after a botched press conference that ended abruptly after one question, that Churchill Downs CEO Bill Carstanjen did not want to answer questions about why the Preakness Stakes was excluded from the new horse racing series for 3yo's."
– Ray Paulick
Then, from the embedded report on NYRA's response:
“This is in no way at all … touching the Triple Crown,” O’Rourke said. “This builds on top of the Triple Crown, or alongside it. We don’t change anything with that."
If O'Rourke happened to have had a sudden urge to push the boundaries of the expression "strains credulity", his experiment was a rousing success. No one, and I mean no one who knows anything about the game, would believe that the announced series of races would not degrade the status of the Preakness, let alone "touch" the Triple Crown.
More from the embedded/linked Paulick Report article:
Asked whether the Preakness Stakes, Haskell Stakes or Pennsylvania Derby had been approached about joining the initiative, O’Rourke acknowledged that no discussions had yet taken place. “This was just for now,” he said. “Now that it’s been released, those conversations will happen.”
Say what?! “This was just for now...” ? Did O'Rourke and Carstanjen have a few too many drinks over dinner the night before the announcement, and hand their scribbled notes on a napkin to a secretary the following morning for "immediate release"?
No discussions took place with those connected to three racetracks with marquee Grade I races for three-year-olds, all of which are likely to be adversely affected by the newly formed Thoroughbred Championship Series ?
Does this strike anyone as being a well thought out "disruption"? Does it seem likely to primarily benefit the broader industry, or does it increasingly appear to be, as I suggested in my initial post on the topic, a reflection of the two most powerful American racetrack entities joining forces, and creating leverage in order to grab bigger pieces of a shrinking pie?
Whatever happens from this point on, I think it fair to say that both O'Rourke and Carstanjen were, in chart-callers parlance, unprepared for the start of this particular event.
I did a dive about 15 yrs ago on the Triple Crown. It was fascinating, that every set of data - website traffic, google search, handle, attendance, pointed to horse racing having a TC season (and honestly, not much else).
It drives everything with the general public.
@Tatotatoing@kekskaiserin I think there's also the context of Churchill Downs trying and failing to buy the Preakness stakes, so it not being included in the new 3yo series feels like CD and the NYRA are throwing a hissy fit at not getting it, trying to destroy the US Triple Crown in the process.
Why are we not taking the $5 million bonus and applying it to an older horse series to keep the stars in training an extra year? Or more since they could compete multiple times? Why try to kill off the only event in racing that the general public actually cares about instead?
I think this is unbelievably dumb.
Pray it doesn’t work, because if it does, the sports’ only good marketing vehicle (thats worth billions in brand value) will have died.
Guys, you have to understand that Ketchup is a studio that just started out.
It’s an independent studio; it’s not like those major, successful companies. They’re doing the absolute best they can with marketing.
You could help Ketchup with the marketing too, you know?
the most annoying thing about the new NYRA-CDI series isn't Preakness erasure but its furthering of the 3yo division that already gets all the media coverage at expense of the senior circuit (and turf racing, but that battle has long been lost)
I’ll forever love champions and how it was the definitive method of introduction for casual players into the comp scene because they’ll come up with shit like THUNDER BASTIODON and SOMEHOW make it work 😭
Hi everyone, i know it has been a while since I last posted but, I want to share something really cool that I found while mindlessly scrolling through YouTube.
Someone made a one hour long movie adaptation of 'Goodbye Eri'.
@RepoleStable@ChurchillDowns@TheNYRA This doesnt help horse racing in the US at all. This kills the Triple Crown out of pettiness because CDI couldn't get the Preakness. All this series will do is try and kill Maryland racing so they can get the Preakness through legal bureaucracy.
🏆 SHERGAR CUP TEAMS 🏆
🇬🇧🇮🇪 Great Britain & Ireland 🇬🇧🇮🇪
Saffie Osborne, Ryan Moore, Dylan Browne McMonagle
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Jockey Club 🇭🇰
Vincent Ho, Jerry Chau, Luke Ferraris
🇪🇺 Europe 🇪🇺
Christophe Lemaire, Marie Velon, Frida Valle Skar
🌍 Rest of the World 🌍
Jamie Melham, Yutaka Take, Suraj Narredu