@JasminLaine@IBCHUCK@wef Kindergarten called. They want their wide paintbrushes back. The ones you are using to paint đš ideological Poilievre nonsense with.
The world has changed. And so must conservative ideology.
Weâre living in a different decade, a different economic reality and a fundamentally different geopolitical world.
Yet Canadian Conservatives seem determined to keep fighting yesterdayâs ideological battles, recycling the same grievances and political arguments as though nothing has changed.
The principles of conservatism may endure, but the policies and thinking must evolve with the times. What worked 30 years ago isnât necessarily what Canada needs today.
The question isnât whether we should abandon conservative principles. Itâs whether those principles can evolve to meet the realities of a world that no longer operates by the old rules.
Oh, what a tweet! Oh, what a sight!
A Conservative genius has come out to fight!
No facts, no logic, no thoughts to convey,
Just playground insults from Grade 5A!
They huff and they puff, they stomp and they shout,
But nobody knows what theyâre angry about!
They call others clueless, they call others dumb,
Then prove that their brains have gone out for a crumb.
A thesis! A masterpiece! What a delight!
Three lines of nonsense, and not one insight!
Oh, Jasmin! Oh, Jasmin! What nonsense you write!
You call Trumpâs aggression a trade dispute fight?
He threatens our tariffs, our jobs and our trade,
Then boasts of the fifty-first state to be made!
He calls our prime minister âGovernorâ too,
And somehow thatâs normal? Well, goodness! Who knew?
He bullies, he blusters, he threatens, he sneers,
While you wave your pom-poms and cover your ears.
âBut eighty-five percent!â you proudly proclaim,
As though that excuses the rest of his game!
If someone stole fifteen percent of your cash,
Would you thank the dear fellow for leaving your stash?
A threat is a threat, whether whispered or shouted,
And facts remain facts, however theyâre doubted.
So spare us the spin and the political show,
Thereâs something quite simple Canadians know:
When a bully threatens your country and trade,
You donât call it normal and join his parade!
The Conservative economic playbook is all too predictable.
Sell it. Lease it. Lay people off. Cut taxes. And lie about the consequences.
Five tricks. Same tired playbook.
And here comes Pierre Poilievre demanding another minister be fired. How utterly predictable.
Whereâs the vision? Whereâs the economic strategy? Whereâs the plan to actually build something?
Firing people isnât an economic strategy. Itâs what you shout when youâve run out of ideas.
The Conservative economic playbook is all too predictable.
Sell it. Lease it. Lay people off. Cut taxes. And lie about the consequences.
Five tricks. Same tired playbook.
And here comes Pierre Poilievre demanding another minister be fired. How utterly predictable.
Whereâs the vision? Whereâs the economic strategy? Whereâs the plan to actually build something?
Firing people isnât an economic strategy. Itâs what you shout when youâve run out of ideas.
@martinekerrdxb@QuantumGuard17 HAD? Hereâs one for you: Had a functioning Conservative Party before it became a factory for grievances, outrage and misinformation.
Oh, Quebec! Oh, Quebec! What a terrible show!
Your premier is puffing wherever he goes!
He stamps and he stomps, he demands to be heard,
But cooperation? Oh, perish the word!
âCarneyâs not my boss!â he cries with delight,
As though throwing a tantrum makes everything right.
Fifty-nine letters! Heâs terribly proud!
He thumps on his chest and he bellows out loud.
While Trump threatens tariffs and trade goes astray,
Our premier cries, âLook at ME! Get out of MY way!â
Canadaâs bargaining, fighting for trade,
While Quebecâs little emperor throws a parade.
He wants all the benefits, strength and protection,
But none of the teamwork, just endless objection.
He wants his own table, his own little chair,
His own little flag and his own special air.
But hereâs something simple this fellow should know:
You donât make a country stronger by stealing the show.
Your egoâs not wisdom, your blusterâs not brains,
Your chest-thumping nonsense brings nothing but strains.
So put down your trumpet, stop blowing your horn,
The country needs leaders, not egos reborn.
For when your ambition grows bigger than sense,
You become a liability, not a defence.
And hereâs the great lesson, as plain as can be:
Quebec deserves leadership, not a premier shouting, âME! ME! ME!â
And one final thought: Trump wants Canada as his 51st state? Let him spend five minutes negotiating with Quebecâs premier.
America wants Canada as its 51st state? Wait until Quebec starts demanding to be the 52nd country!
Oh, Quebec! Oh, Quebec! What a terrible show!
Your premier is puffing wherever he goes!
He stamps and he stomps, he demands to be heard,
But cooperation? Oh, perish the word!
âCarneyâs not my boss!â he cries with delight,
As though throwing a tantrum makes everything right.
Fifty-nine letters! Heâs terribly proud!
He thumps on his chest and he bellows out loud.
While Trump threatens tariffs and trade goes astray,
Our premier cries, âLook at ME! Get out of MY way!â
Canadaâs bargaining, fighting for trade,
While Quebecâs little emperor throws a parade.
He wants all the benefits, strength and protection,
But none of the teamwork, just endless objection.
He wants his own table, his own little chair,
His own little flag and his own special air.
But hereâs something simple this fellow should know:
You donât make a country stronger by stealing the show.
Your egoâs not wisdom, your blusterâs not brains,
Your chest-thumping nonsense brings nothing but strains.
So put down your trumpet, stop blowing your horn,
The country needs leaders, not egos reborn.
For when your ambition grows bigger than sense,
You become a liability, not a defence.
And hereâs the great lesson, as plain as can be:
Quebec deserves leadership, not a premier shouting, âME! ME! ME!â
And one final thought: Trump wants Canada as his 51st state? Let him spend five minutes negotiating with Quebecâs premier.
America wants Canada as its 51st state? Wait until Quebec starts demanding to be the 52nd country!
Marco Rubio, is this historical amnesia, breathtaking ignorance, or a complete collapse of common sense?
In 1994, Ukraine surrendered the worldâs third-largest nuclear arsenal in exchange for security assurances from Russia, Britain and the United States.
Russia broke its word and invaded. America and Britain provided assistance, but their assurances failed to keep Ukraine safe.
Now, with astonishing logic, you suggest that the very aggressor who violated those commitments must approve Ukraineâs future security arrangements?
The arsonist gets to approve the fire escape? The burglar gets to choose the locks? The wolf gets a veto over the sheepâs protection?
And have you considered the catastrophic message this sends to every nation contemplating nuclear disarmament?
Give up your nuclear weapons, trust the worldâs great powers, and when those assurances fail, discover that your aggressor gets a say in whether you can defend yourself.
Marco, youâve managed to turn the Budapest Memorandum into a warning against nuclear disarmament.
Why would any nation surrender its nuclear deterrent after witnessing this extraordinary betrayal of trust?
Marc, youâre confusing ideology with national security. China has serious problems, but it hasnât threatened to turn Canada into its 51st province. It isnât our closest trading partner imposing punitive tariffs, threatening our sovereignty and using our economic dependence as leverage.
The United States has spent decades involved in wars and military interventions around the world. China has its own record of coercion and territorial aggression, but the two countries pose different risks.
National security isnât about which countryâs political system you dislike most. Itâs about identifying who can actually threaten Canadaâs sovereignty, economy and independence. Thatâs the distinction Carney is making, and your outrage completely misses it.
Your argument has one rather glaring problem: itâs 2026, and youâre still arguing against Justin Trudeau.
Canada is a parliamentary democracy. The prime minister sets the governmentâs agenda, and Mark Carney is pursuing a fundamentally different economic strategy from his predecessor. You can criticize that strategy, but pretending Carney and Trudeau are interchangeable demonstrates either a remarkably poor understanding of Canadian politics or an unwillingness to acknowledge that the political landscape has changed.
Now, about Highway 407.
I realize youâre in British Columbia, so the 407 probably means absolutely nothing to you. Albertans and Quebecers may feel the same way. But hereâs what youâre overlooking: Ontario is absolutely critical to forming a federal government.
The Conservatives leased the 407 for 99 years in exchange for $3.1 billion. That short-term windfall created an extraordinary long-term financial burden for Ontario motorists.
Let me put that into perspective.
Driving the entire 407 round trip can cost approximately $150 in tolls. Five days a week, thatâs $750. Over 52 weeks, thatâs $39,000 annually in tolls alone.
Now add the cost of operating a vehicle. At 60 cents per kilometre, a long-distance GTA commuter driving 40,000 kilometres annually faces another $24,000 in vehicle expenses.
Thatâs $63,000 a year in after-tax commuting costs. At Ontarioâs top marginal income-tax rate of 53.53%, that represents approximately $135,000 in additional gross earnings.
Even a less extreme commute can consume the equivalent of $100,000 in gross annual earnings. Just to get to work. Just to turn the lights on at your business. Before youâve paid your mortgage, bought groceries or put a dollar toward retirement.
For the average Ontario family, that kind of commuting expense is simply unimaginable.
And you think this is some irrelevant provincial decision that Ontario voters should forget?
Weâre only 27 years into a 99-year lease. There are another 72 years to go. The tolls keep coming, and the financial consequences outlive the politicians who signed the agreement.
Please spare me the provincial-versus-federal distinction. Of course theyâre separate governments. But voters recognize political philosophies, and privatization, asset sales, spending cuts and tax reductions have long been recurring features of Conservative economic thinking.
The 407 isnât merely an old provincial decision. Itâs a living, expensive reminder of what happens when governments confuse selling assets with creating prosperity.
And hereâs the irony: youâre lecturing me about productivity, capital investment and economic competitiveness while dismissing transportation expenses that can consume an extraordinary share of a workerâs income.
Carneyâs economic strategy deserves scrutiny. Absolutely. But heâs attempting to address Canadaâs investment and productivity problems through a different approach.
So hereâs my question: What specifically would Poilievre do differently to attract private investment, increase productivity and improve living standards?
Because pointing backward at Trudeau isnât an economic plan, and dismissing the 407 doesnât make its consequences disappear.
Iâve been a Conservative most of my life, and Iâve watched the party operate for decades. Its economic playbook has rarely changed: sell it, lease it, lay people off, or cut taxes. Four familiar tricks, but precious little vision for building a stronger country.
Ontarioâs Highway 407 is a perfect example. The Conservatives collected roughly $3.1 billion for a 99-year lease, sacrificing generations of future revenue for a one-time political windfall. Thatâs what happens when balancing todayâs books becomes more important than tomorrowâs prosperity.
And now weâre supposed to believe that investing in Canadian productivity is somehow equivalent to throwing money away?
Thereâs an enormous difference between borrowing to finance consumption and investing to expand a countryâs productive capacity. The real questions are whether those investments generate economic growth, attract private capital, improve competitiveness and ultimately produce a return. Those are legitimate questions. Simply pointing at the deficit and declaring disaster isnât serious economic analysis.
Meanwhile, Canadaâs own pension funds have increasingly directed investment capital abroad. We have enormous pools of Canadian savings financing economic growth elsewhere while Canadian businesses struggle to attract the capital needed to expand.
Thatâs precisely the problem Carney is trying to address.
After years of watching a cottage industry of Conservative commentators make a living attacking Justin Trudeau, Iâm beginning to wonder whether theyâve forgotten how to do anything else. Trudeau is gone. The economic challenges arenât.
Canada doesnât need another generation of politicians who know the price of everything and the value of nothing. It needs people who understand the difference between liquidating a countryâs assets and investing in its future.
And until Conservatives can explain what they would actually build, rather than simply what they would cut, theyâre offering criticism, not an economic plan.