Nahhhh they are taking the piss now. What is this police complex and power Brits think they have???? Never at work but always got time to be filming and disturbing strangers.
DOGE deletes itself on July 4th. It will be remembered as a hugely destructive failure.
Musk promised $2 trillion in savings.
What we got, by DOGE’s own unverified math, was $215 billion. Even that number was never proven.
The costs were atrocious. Nearly 140,000 federal workers pushed out. Veterans waiting longer for care. USAID dismantled while people died overseas as a direct result. 20-year-olds with Red Bulls and no college degrees rummaging through Americans’ most sensitive data.
Musk, the world’s richest man, a federal contractor with billions in government business, auditing the government that pays him, accountable to no voter anywhere.
Even Musk now says he wouldn’t do it again. The guy who ran it calls it a mistake.
Government reform was there for the taking. Both parties know federal technology is outdated. Both parties know waste exists. Fixing it required serious people working with career civil servants who know where the problems actually are. Instead we got a chainsaw, a photo op, and years of lost expertise we now have to rebuild.
Now Trump’s budget director says there will be no final accounting or receipts. They promised transparency and they’re closing up shop in the dark.
They’re counting on us all to forget.
https://t.co/LhgbGUY2Ca
I asked AI to critique Restore Britain and Rupert Lowe’s unofficial Muslim Rape Gang Inquiry-
1. Source and Independence.
The inquiry was privately funded through public donations, with no statutory powers. It was chaired by Rupert Lowe, a Restore Britain UK MP with an explicit political agenda on immigration. This creates obvious bias concerns — it is an advocacy document as much as an inquiry report.
2. The 250,000 Figure.
This is probably the most contested claim in the report. It originates from a 2019 House of Lords speech, not from any independent research or data collection. It relies on extrapolation from a small number of towns applied nationally, without accounting for local variation. No academic or official body has validated it.
3. Statistical Methodology
The report heavily cites conviction data to make claims about perpetrator demographics, but convictions represent a small fraction of reported cases. Using conviction rates to draw population-level conclusions about offending patterns is methodologically unreliable. It also does not adequately distinguish group-based child sexual exploitation (CSE) from child sexual abuse more broadly.
4. The Religious Analysis
The section attributing grooming gang behaviour to Islamic theology is written by a single contributor and draws selectively on religious texts. It conflates theology, culture, and individual criminal behaviour. Most Muslim communities have condemned these crimes, and criminologists generally emphasise socioeconomic and structural factors alongside cultural ones.
5. Survivor Testimony
While survivor testimony is valid and important, some accounts include extraordinary claims — murders witnessed, police involvement in abuse — that have not been independently verified or prosecuted. The report presents these without caveats or appropriate qualification.
6. Political Selectivity
Labour is treated as primarily responsible while the Conservative Party's 14 years in government receives considerably lighter criticism. Scotland, the NHS, and social care receive criticism but with less rigour applied to evidence standards than elsewhere.
Summary
This report should be read as a politically motivated advocacy document that draws on real and serious events, but applies inconsistent evidential standards and reaches conclusions that go beyond what the evidence reliably supports.
"Tragic...senseless"
"He brought the Sikh faith into disrepute...those actions do not reflect the community"
"There is no special treatment for Sikhs...this stiff sentence sends a warning"
A statement from community figures Kam Singh and Jas Singh on the Nowak murder case.
The Kirpan debate continues.
Let us be precise.
Henry Nowak was murdered.
His killer was convicted. ✅
The law worked. ✅
The blade used?
Not a typical kirpan.
Not worn for faith.
Used as a weapon.
The answer is not a ban.
The answer is:
✅ Enforce existing laws
✅ Prosecute every misuse
✅ Support Sikh community’s own review
✅ Distinguish faith from crime
83,000 Sikh soldiers died for Britain.
Wearing their kirpan.
One crime does not erase 300 years of Sikh service.
Justice for Henry.
Respect for Sikhs.
Both. Always. 🙏
💔⚖️🇬 #BritishSikhs #Kirpan #BritishIndians
Footage of a Muslim officer being abused at a protest was widely shared this weekend.
It happened a few weeks ago and we won’t be resharing the video, but yesterday we saw more of the same.
Nobody should have to put up with abuse at work and that includes police officers.
Arrests were made in all these incidents and we'll be pushing for charges in every case.
Good afternoon on the doorsteps in Bexleyheath getting out the vote for @reformparty_uk
Be it bins or our borders - the uni-party Blairite orthodoxy has broken Britain, whacked our wallets empty and engulfed our country with mass uncontrolled migration.
It's time for Reform!
@Revolut Hi, when will my app show the revolut mobile option? I'm looking to sign up but I am yet to see the option in the rev points section of the app.
Awfully convenient that Nicki Minaj found her conservative voice right as she’s losing a $20M mansion and her husband needs a pardon. Just like Russell Brand becoming an anti-woke crusader right after being accused of sexual assault. It’s a grift as old as time.
While you’re being whipped into a frenzy, he’s on holiday.
While you’re told to hate Muslims, he’s happily spending time in Muslim countries.
While you’re shouting in the streets, he’s eating well, travelling freely, and enjoying life.
Ask yourself one simple question.
If these people are such a threat, why is he so comfortable around them?
He doesn’t live by the fear he sells you.
You do.
That makes you the mugs.
Because he gets the money, the sunshine, and the good time.
You get the anger, the consequences, and the hate.
If someone tells you to despise a group while happily socialising with them themselves, that isn’t leadership.
That’s manipulation.
What does that say about him?
And more importantly, what does it say about you if you keep carrying it for him?