@RLRottman@CTownEnjoyer Actually it was Josh. But still, to blindly side with Josh/Brandon just goes to show BAM's incompetence.
And also they're just doing whatever they can to save their good friends' asses.
@CTownEnjoyer@Drogdor1 Are estimation errors lies? Again, a 75% error is reasonable. So why not a 50% error? Sounds fine to me. It's just a normal part of estimation.
@CTownEnjoyer@Drogdor1 Right it's not ironclad. Just like all estimates, like the $200K estimate, aren't. So if it's possible Coffee could get his $20K estimate wrong by $15K (75% error), same could happen for the $200K (50% error).
@CTownEnjoyer@Drogdor1 I'd say it's far more important to be consistent. If a 75% error is possible according to you, a 50% error should therefore also be possible.
@Drogdor1@CTownEnjoyer Exactly, and they ignore anything that might prove them wrong.
For context, this guy thinks that Coffee's $20K in-store estimate could be wrong by $15K since "some" sets were maybe picked up in error.
Keep in mind that BAM estimated it to be $5K.
@CTownEnjoyer@Drogdor1 I don't get why you're making a big deal out of the $200K estimate lol. You agree that a 50% error is possible when making estimates.
@CTownEnjoyer@Drogdor1 I mean, 50% is a reasonable estimation accuracy. Given how BAM estimated the in-store sets to be at $5K but turned out to be ~$20K
@TheVikkiVerse $200K to $100K, a 50% error, is an estimation accuracy that is possible according to CT. Given that CT believes Coffee's $20K in store amount could be off by $15K (a 75% error). So really, it's just an estimation mistake. No lies here.
@CTownEnjoyer@ncgyles@coffeebreak_YT There could be extenuating circumstances. I agree though it's suspicious. Like I've been saying, the Gormans have been providing arguably terrible excuses this whole time.