Gamer, Professional 9-Ball Idiot. My opinions are my own and not any others. Cheat 2 Win. Your block = Your tap out. Always looking to laugh at lolcows.
Overall, not bad, but not amazing. Just a lingers a little too much on the romance part of the story than what you're promised in the trailers. But it's fine for what it is. You know what's coming, but you do feel some emotion, so I guess it does what it wanted to?
So.
Roofman.
That was... interesting. The trailers bill it as a comedy of errors for a robber. Which does happen. He does get into bad situations where despite him being a 'genius planner' his plans go awry. However, the movie is HEAVY into romance where he meets a girl.
And yes you do feel sorry for him, which I guess was the point. This honestly feels more like a Florida Man story than where it actually took place, but w/e. Acting is fine. Just... it focuses on the rom part a bit TOO much, in spite of what the trailers promise.
Oh shut up.
You throw bitch fits over fictional women with curves in video games and call them "unrealistic" and "harmful."
Meanwhile, you defend Cuties, a film featuring real underage girls twerking in skimpy outfits and performing sexually suggestive moves.
You shame real women by saying big breasts aren't "real" unless they've got implants.
You don't get to body-shame women while supporting media that sexualizes actual children.
No one takes you people seriously. Your double standards are disgusting.
Jealous pigs.
It's time to hit Collective Shout in their wallet! They like petitioning card companies? Let's petition one of their funding sources, GoodCompany. 🔥vs🔥
Below is a template to use. Take it and throw it into Grok, ChatGPT to mix it up or copy/paste it directly.
Send all emails here: [email protected]
---- TEMPLATE ----
Dear Board of Directors,
I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding GoodCompany's association with or promotion of Collective Shout, an Australian organization that positions itself as a grassroots movement against the objectification of women and sexualization of girls. While their stated mission may appear benevolent on the surface, a closer examination reveals a pattern of aggressive censorship tactics, intolerance toward differing viewpoints, and actions that extend far beyond Australia's borders, impacting individuals and businesses globally. As a platform that likely facilitates donations or corporate matching programs, GoodCompany has a responsibility to ensure that the charities it supports are transparently represented, lest donors and companies unwittingly contribute to causes that promote censorship and division.
At the core of my concern is Collective Shout's relentless pursuit of censorship, which they achieve not through direct advocacy alone but by leveraging major financial institutions to enforce their agenda. For instance, the group has openly claimed responsibility for pressuring payment processors like MasterCard and Visa to withhold services from platforms hosting content they deem objectionable, such as adult-themed video games on Steam. This has resulted in the mass censorship of over 80 games on Steam, affecting developers and consumers worldwide, regardless of local laws or cultural norms. By influencing global payment systems, Collective Shout effectively imposes its moral standards on an international scale, bypassing democratic processes and stifling free expression. Censorship of this nature is widely rejected, as it undermines personal freedoms and the open exchange of ideas, yet this "charity" persists in wielding undue influence over global commerce.
Their tactics extend to more petty and vindictive campaigns, such as their inability to tolerate a simple joke on a t-shirt. In 2016, Collective Shout targeted Brumby's Bakery, a small Australian chain, over staff uniforms bearing the lighthearted slogan "We've got the best buns in town." They deemed it sexualized and launched a public outcry, pressuring the bakery to withdraw the shirts after complaints from employees. This incident exemplifies their overreach: harassing a modest business over harmless wordplay, turning it into a national controversy. Similarly, they have criticized other small enterprises for perceived sexism, demonstrating a pattern of bullying rather than constructive dialogue while often stretching the truth of the matters at hand to serve their aggressive agenda.
Furthermore, Collective Shout's approach includes intolerant behavior toward those who disagree with them, including affiliations with transphobic views and instances where they or their associates have engaged in misgendering or shaming women who do not align with their ideology by calling them men or outsiders to feminism. Such tactics not only alienate potential allies but also perpetuate harm under the guise of advocacy, further eroding trust in their mission.
Despite being based in Australia, Collective Shout's actions have a profound global ripple effect. Their campaigns against international platforms and payment processors demonstrate that they are not content to focus on local issues but seek to dictate standards worldwide. This extraterritorial overreach means that donors supporting them through GoodCompany may inadvertently fund efforts that suppress content and freedoms in other countries, far removed from Australian concerns.
If GoodCompany's description of Collective Shout fails to disclose these censorship-driven tactics, supporters could be duped into believing they are contributing to a purely positive cause. In cases where companies engage in donation matching, employees might find their contributions amplified toward an organization that promotes values they fundamentally oppose, such as broad-scale censorship and intolerance. I urge the board to review Collective Shout's listing and ensure full transparency about their methods, or reconsider their inclusion altogether. Censorship should not be masked as charity, and GoodCompany's reputation depends on aligning with organizations that truly foster openness and respect.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and any steps you may take to address these issues.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Visa and Mastercard go hard on Anime, thinking all of anime is “porn” but go easy on Child Exploitation and sites like OnlyFans.
There is a dual standard at play here, and people are noticing.
Women: We’d choose the bear! Hahaha!
Men: Bye!
Women: Where are the men? Why aren’t they approaching us? Ugh, MEN!
Should society be surprised that many men are disengaging? There’s been a campaign against men for decades! I think we must treat men with compassion and respect.
This is absolutely FUCKING disgusting.
Why the FUCK would you use MALE anatomy as a reference when designing Lara Croft, one of gaming's most iconic female protagonists?
There is NO FUCKING justification for this. Men and women have fundamentally different muscle and fat distribution. This is blatant female erasure.
You're gutting what makes women visibly female and turning them into something androgynous and hollow. This is misogyny, and everyone sees it.
If anyone needed proof that there's a deliberate agenda to strip away femininity and reshape women into some bland, androgynous piece of shit mess, this is it.
I fucking hate modern devs so much. This is why no one trusts these assholes anymore, they hate femininity and it shows. Fucking bitches.
@CrystalDynamics@WetaWorkshop@TombRaider
Good thing I trusted my Gut feeling when VShojo tried to recruit me..
Their contract was riddles in red flags & basically legal robbery 😨
This makes me sick to my stomach..
PLEASE, if you can, support Mouse & the IDF!
I waited to make a statement, cuz I'm always anxious & struggle to find my words.
But, yes, i'm leaving vshojo.
I was an OG talent, put my everything into this comp. But I'm beyond devastated at what happened. & I never in a million years thought I'd be saying these words. 💔