This woman received a summons to appear in court for theft based on flock camera evidence that she was stealing packages. The problem for law enforcement is that she had her own cameras set up, which absolutely proved that it wasn’t her. The officer refused to show her the evidence at her door because he said that she was arguing with him and not being forthright. When you look at the camera footage, it is two totally different people. He absolutely was refusing to cooperate with her. He was convinced that the camera footage showed her, even though she had camera footage to prove that it wasn’t. This is the danger of these cameras. Law enforcement in some cases is using and abusing them .
Ultimately, she was able to prove her innocence using her own camera footage, but what if she didn’t have her own cameras set up?
🚨A K9 died after being left to slowly suffer in a car on a 100F day and @PittSheriff waited over a month to tell anyone. Now the Sherrif has investigated themselves, blamed politics and the budget. If you did this you would be in prison. Share this we need accountability
FUN FACT: Abigail Spanberger beat Nick Freitas for the VA07 Congressional seat in 2020 by only 8,270 mail-in ballots found on a thumb drive the next day.
Want to hear something crazy?
Over a 15 year time period there was a 72% increase in criminals not being competent to stand trial for their crimes.
72% increase over 15 years.
Criminals competent enough to commit acts of violence but not enough to stand trial for it.
Scam.
You're telling me that Flock cameras have the capabilities to track a woman across multiple states to track if she got an abortion and a man who crossed state lines for weed, but they aren't being used for finding missing kids or get a glimpse of Mitch McConnell returning home?
Millions of Americans are angry about the Senate's refusal to seriously address Election Fraud.
I think its fair to ask; "How many of the current 100 Senators have themselves benefited from unfair elections?"
John Thune is a coward and a traitor.
John Thune is a coward and a traitor.
John Thune is a coward and a traitor.
John Thune is a coward and a traitor.
John Thune is a coward and a traitor.
John Thune is a coward and a traitor.
John Thune is a coward and a traitor.
John Thune is a coward and a traitor.
That’s it. That’s the post.
A couple of days ago, somebody sent me a tip in my DMs about two North Carolina PACs.
So I went down the rabbit hole.
Here’s what I found. 👇🏼
Two North Carolina PACs — the Muslim American Public Affairs Council (MAPAC) and the NC Indian-American PAC — are soliciting donations online to “support candidates.”
But here’s where it gets interesting:
The online donation forms I verified don’t ask donors to certify that they’re U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.
That’s not exactly a small detail when you’re talking about political contributions.
And one of these organizations takes it a step further. It describes itself as a 501(c)(3) and says donations are tax-deductible — while also being registered as a political committee and openly supporting candidates.
Ummm…
Pretty sure that deserves some questions.
Federal law prohibits foreign nationals from contributing money to U.S. elections, and political committees have compliance obligations for accepting contributions.
So when you have political organizations soliciting money online without an obvious citizenship certification — and one apparently advertising tax-deductible donations while operating as a political committee — I think North Carolinians have every right to ask what, exactly, is going on.
Maybe there’s an explanation.
If there is, I’d love to hear it.
Because this isn’t about whether I like these organizations, their candidates, or their politics.
It’s about the rules.
North Carolina elections belong to North Carolina voters.
If you want to play in our political system, you should have to follow the same rules everybody else does.
Transparency isn't optional.
And neither is compliance.