SureshPKumar

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@chennithala Since Home Minister of Kerala is too busy after CEC @ECISVEEP request Kerala CM @vdsatheesan to take care Home Ministry as well! HM made sure that his tweets r copied to Sonia Dynasty, though not copied to CM! Some r experts in fishing from troubled water!! @INCKerala

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@chennithala @RahulGandhi From Home Minister of a State who took oath of office against CEC @ECISVEEP ,a constitutional post! Ensured copying to DYNASTY Prince......CM @vdsatheesan happening under you! Good going.....Whatever image generated by u as CM is being spoiled by your own cabinet colleagues😞

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@prasannavishy @mohandastg If I recall correctly, you were against Vizhinjam port!.....That time you were referring/comparing it to Vallarpadam port as well! Kerala need industry ....

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@mr_mayank The price country paying for the INACTION by @BJP4India Govt against the SONIA DYNASTY, be it NH Case, UK Citizenship, damad' property scams, Aircel....For Magnanimity of rulers NATION will pay the price😞 @narendramodi @AmitShah @rajnathsingh @blsanthosh @rammadhav_ @RSSorg

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@RajeswariAiyer Above true @_YogendraYadav ?!

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@INCIndia Thus say UK citizen... @RahulGandhi should be thankful to @BJP4India Govt who r in the footsteps of King Prithviraj Chauhan who liked/promoted enemy Gori expecting he follow war rules😔 History warns what followed! @narendramodi @AmitShah @blsanthosh @rammadhav_ @VIGNESHBJP_KTK

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@chennithala Means..U will act with same vigour on CMRL Case against Pinarayi? But not happening 😔 U r not ready to file FIR against Pinarayi despite request by @dir_ed while on individual' request u filed FIR against CEC @ECISVEEP! Include Muneer also who was then Minister! @vdsatheesan

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@INCKerala https://t.co/WUCLQvz5Ox

[Sreejith Panickar @PanickarS]

Supreme Court today reportedly asked who approved the Form 6. Well, here's what I found from the Supreme Court's earlier order endorsing the SIR activities in Bihar. Judgment by CJI Suryakant himself.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@INCIndia https://t.co/WUCLQvz5Ox

[Sreejith Panickar @PanickarS]

Supreme Court today reportedly asked who approved the Form 6. Well, here's what I found from the Supreme Court's earlier order endorsing the SIR activities in Bihar. Judgment by CJI Suryakant himself.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@kcvenugopalmp https://t.co/WUCLQvz5Ox

[Sreejith Panickar @PanickarS]

Supreme Court today reportedly asked who approved the Form 6. Well, here's what I found from the Supreme Court's earlier order endorsing the SIR activities in Bihar. Judgment by CJI Suryakant himself.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@TimesNow @RahulGandhi If you really serious of your reputation, advisable you fact check before quoting LOP!! https://t.co/WUCLQvzDE5

[Sreejith Panickar @PanickarS]

Supreme Court today reportedly asked who approved the Form 6. Well, here's what I found from the Supreme Court's earlier order endorsing the SIR activities in Bihar. Judgment by CJI Suryakant himself.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@TimesNow https://t.co/WUCLQvz5Ox

[Sreejith Panickar @PanickarS]

Supreme Court today reportedly asked who approved the Form 6. Well, here's what I found from the Supreme Court's earlier order endorsing the SIR activities in Bihar. Judgment by CJI Suryakant himself.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@prakashraaj Hello actor ..here it is👇...seems you were living (not acting) as Pandi Durai in Pandippada!! 😃https://t.co/WUCLQvz5Ox

[Sreejith Panickar @PanickarS]

Supreme Court today reportedly asked who approved the Form 6. Well, here's what I found from the Supreme Court's earlier order endorsing the SIR activities in Bihar. Judgment by CJI Suryakant himself.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@poornimajoshi72 https://t.co/WUCLQvzDE5

[Sreejith Panickar @PanickarS]

Supreme Court today reportedly asked who approved the Form 6. Well, here's what I found from the Supreme Court's earlier order endorsing the SIR activities in Bihar. Judgment by CJI Suryakant himself.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@PanickarS In the eagerness to blindly support Dynasty family of @RahulGandhi @priyankagandhi hope Kerala CM @vdsatheesan won't make irresponsible statements or act irresponsibly as done by @chennitha by initiating a vigilance investigation on 2006 incident, which was already closed!😞

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@jgopikrishnan70 https://t.co/HYXtAmmPyn

[Rahul Shivshankar @RShivshankar]

The ecosystem is being mischievous. The facts are:
SC DIDN'T APPROVE THE MODIFIED FORM 6. BUT SC DID UPHOLD ECI'S RESIDUAL AUTHORITY TO ADAPT THE DOCUMENTATION FRAMEWORK FOR SIR.
This is the distinction ECOSYSTEM is deliberately blurring.

Yes, the Supreme Court has now clarified that it did not specifically approve the later-modified Form 6.

But the May 27, 2026 order (ATTACHED BELOW) expressly held in context of Form 6 that ECI “retains a degree of residual authority” to formulate a documentation framework suited to an SIR.
The only condition the SC put on that power is that it CANNOT be arbitrary.
So, today's clarification does not establish that the ECI had no power to adapt the documentation framework.
Nor does it establish that CEC Gyanesh Kumar “lied”.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@PrabhuChawla FYI https://t.co/HYXtAmnnnV

[Rahul Shivshankar @RShivshankar]

The ecosystem is being mischievous. The facts are:
SC DIDN'T APPROVE THE MODIFIED FORM 6. BUT SC DID UPHOLD ECI'S RESIDUAL AUTHORITY TO ADAPT THE DOCUMENTATION FRAMEWORK FOR SIR.
This is the distinction ECOSYSTEM is deliberately blurring.

Yes, the Supreme Court has now clarified that it did not specifically approve the later-modified Form 6.

But the May 27, 2026 order (ATTACHED BELOW) expressly held in context of Form 6 that ECI “retains a degree of residual authority” to formulate a documentation framework suited to an SIR.
The only condition the SC put on that power is that it CANNOT be arbitrary.
So, today's clarification does not establish that the ECI had no power to adapt the documentation framework.
Nor does it establish that CEC Gyanesh Kumar “lied”.

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@TMoolamattom അത് വെ.... ഇത്‌ റേ......!!! @BJP4India @BJP4Keralam നേതാക്കൾ @INCKerala @INCIndia @chennithala യെ കണ്ടു പഠിക്കണം!... NH അഴിമതി, അളിയന്റെ ഭൂമി കുംഭകോണം, UK പൗരത്വം, Aircel, Lavlin എത്രയെണ്ണം കോടതിയിൽ ഉറക്കത്തിൽ!😔 @narendramodi @arjunrammeghwal @RajeevRC_X @blsanthosh @AmitShah

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@surendranbjp @BJP4India Govt need to learn from @chennithala who justified police pointing gun on an unarmed TVM BJP councilor! Now digging 2006 case against CEC @ECISVEEP !While Lavlin, NH, Aircel, Damad's scams & many huge corruption cases sleeping under @narendramodi Govt @arjunrammeghwal

[SureshPKumar @SureshPKumar]

@blsanthosh @INCIndia @RahulGandhi High time @BJP4India Govt prove to Nation that law applies EQUALLY to all! Y all UPA era huge corruption cases at snails pace or non-starter? UPA Corrupts preaching on constitution is travesty of justice!😞U have seen how aggressively @chennithala @vdsatheesan Govt digging cases!