tujue

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 @grok retards like you havent read a single article or a book in their lives and all yall do is say "read history" while lacking the basic ability of reading comprehension

Mughals are a Turkic persianized Empire. THATS IT.

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 @grok Read my first tweet. i DID say until Akbar didnt i?

My point is that the court and the military still had sizable amount of Turks and the dynasty was still turkic.

if ur going to be an AItard open a fresh page and just ask grok, are they Turkic? Cuz it says yes everytime i do.

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 @grok Long story short, The court had Turks(Turanis). Military had Turks. Some of the governors were Turks(Asaf Jahi). Dynasty was Turkic and the whole interaction with nader shah shows that the others knew that.

Again, no reason to not to include them in the video, theyre turkic

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@Irene_Trebizond Trabzonlu musunuz? öyleyse neresinden?

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 @grok mid mughal period court consisted of persians mostly with some of them being turks, military was still overwhelmingly dominated by turks. comparable to ghaznavids for example. there is simply no reason for them to not appear in the video as a turkic empire xD

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 @grok just read the book that i mentioned instead of throwing insults like a 5 iq nigger in twitter xD. Mughals take an important part in turkic history alongside with delhi sultanate. you are truly delusional if you completely disregard their turkic origins and identity.

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 @grok "pan-turkic narratives" hahahahha sure nigga. i agree that gradually they became less and less turkic but theyre still a turkic empire, simple as that. plenty of turks were remained under their services and kept their identity, the video in question is %95 true as well.

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 Turks were called Turanis within the Empire. Dynasty was Turkic. Court had Turks and the military was influenced by Turks. Rajputs viewed them as foreigners.

Theres absolutely no reason for them to not appear in that video attached to the tweet. None.

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 @grok Non-Turk is simply diabolical and not true. The court still had considerable amount of Turks. You can ask grok all you want.

I'm not denying that that they were overwhelmingy persianized later on which is true.

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 Can you tell me why nader would prefer speaking in Turkic when both of their respective empires used persian as the lingua franca? Are you actually retarded?

And i think Asaf jahi dynasty was breton in origin right? xD

They were a persianite, locally integrated Turkic Empire.

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 Read the book of Michael H. Fisher. Foundations of the Empire were built on Turkic traditions They spoke Turkic, Fought Turkic and even hunted Turkic. Sure they were persianized and were more integrated amongst the locals later but they were indisputably a Turkic Empire by origin

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 identity too. Muhammad shah of the mughals spoke Turkic with nader shah, ruler of the afsharids during their 1739 summit. Claiming that they had nothing to do with Turks is incredibly absurd

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@tempkashmir @conqouerorazdi @whit48128 Majority of the mughal court until the reign of Akbar khan was predominantly Turkic. Their most powerful statesman until that time Bairam Khan was a Turkic commander in chief and he was a loyal follower of the mughal emperor. The dynasty itself retained their chagatai Turkic ide-

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@conqouerorazdi @whit48128 Can you tell me which ones are not Turkic?

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@arda44205194233 @uludagae @vctrcstl erkekleri baz alırsak 1.65-1.70 diyebiliriz düşünüldüğü kadar cüce değildi millet. çok eski dönemlerde yaşamış şarlman 180 üstüydü, çoğu propagandada kısa diye tasfir edilen napolyon bile 1.68 civarı bir şeydi yani

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@uludagae @vctrcstl Umarım baittir, o zamanın ortalama bir kılıcı 1.5kg, birinin ortalama boyu ise 1.70'ti

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@NadirSarazen Romeika bir etnik köken değil.

[tujue @Suvarrrr]

@cskaenes Yuh