@Plushienby@ArbiterSkyward If you actually understood where Karl Popper was going, it extends to those who are intolerant that refuse to have rational discussion and resorting to violence and suppression. So for example, hating a white person wouldn't apply but silencing and harassing a white person would
@notprinter14 Is it weird that a defamation case that's trying to prove defamation, does not want to mention a story that can't prove defamation, because the story can't be proven true or false in the first place? That's the point of the lawsuit? This is just being uncharitable lol
@Cafe44Every @facetcanyon @Papa_Schmuck120@AlastorHaconYT@Technicals_ Also in both Heather's and Zaptie's statements, they both say 16, and continued the conversation. so it was 20 to 17 then 20 to 16 and he continued. Not to mention, he made videos on Kiwi and Lion Maker and was a law major so Zaptie knows better
@Cafe44Every @facetcanyon @Papa_Schmuck120@AlastorHaconYT@Technicals_ State laws dont matter, it's federal which is 18. The legal issues are CP determined by the Dost Test and enticing a minor to have sex. You can say if it's not "pedo shit" or redeemable, but your source is very bias and inconsistent with standards.
@Ry4nBo1@Technicals_ It is not a clarification on Tech's points in his video, "The Commentary Double Standard" where Tech goes in depth and issues with Zaptie. DeOrio never responded to it and years later had a document to "respond" to the criticism by not responding to the points or details.
@Cheese_lad6@Lmao_YeaOk@Skrub00@Technicals_ The relationship was April to December, Zaptie was 19 then turn 20 in may and in both Heather's and Zaptie's statements, they both say 16. It is a 4 year age gap. This is one of the points Tech had in the Double Standards video. The point is, info you spreading is misinfo.
@Cheese_lad6@Skrub00@Technicals_ Tell me, what is the intention of the images? What was Zaptie's reaction to the said images in the text conversation? The Dost Test states a criteria because of the intention of the images matter. It's not a beach day photo, it's meant to sexually please Zaptie.
@Cheese_lad6@Skrub00@Technicals_ You don't have to call him a pedophile if you want to be correct in psychology or whatever. He still took advantage of underage girl and date another underage girl being 17. It is still sexually exploiting a minor
@Cheese_lad6@Skrub00@Technicals_ It does not matter if one state is 16 or not. Understand that federal law is 18 because it is across states. You're argue for morality but arguing legality again for the third time.
@Cheese_lad6@Technicals_ So why do you use legality to argue for Zaptie and claim an argument of morality? Secondly, what makes something "weird and gross?" Why do you say it is weird and gross? Would you agree enticing a high school fan girl and receiving illegal material is morally wrong?
@Cheese_lad6@Technicals_ Gotcha, but one issue, "the reason AoC matters because it changes from weird and gross to pedo shit," then if we were in Angola, where the AoC is 12, would you just say it is weird and gross? Bc it still sounds like you dictate pedo shit by legality still.
@Cheese_lad6@Technicals_ What is the moral argument bc that Zaptie's state is legal for 16 year olds? That does not make sense. He knows right and wrong because he was a law major and created videos on LionMaker and Kiwiz. Zaptie should've known the relationship with Heather was wrong
@Cheese_lad6@Technicals_ Dispute or not, DeOrio, Zaptie, and Keemstar all said that the lied age is wrong, creating a standard which DeOrio does not follow for Zaptie. And you were arguing legality, bc you are referencing the AoC in state being legal. But you missed the part where I said it is federal.
@Technicals_ For a "final response" it certainly didn't respond to any points about mistake in ages, receiving cp by federal law, enticing a minor, consistency with other stories with morality. Commentary community love titling videos "Criticism Not Welcome" and yet it's only ironic.