@dmbkparker Since the invention of YouTube/internet/search engines
I’m convinced there is nothing I cannot do. It’s almost as if technology has delivered all the information known to man at our fingertips
Bravado would be thinking you could do it in minutes. Logic says it’s possible
@NaviGoBoom I’m on your side now
So you hit them with accurate data and logic and they still ignored you. I see the rift now. The hell with them.They need better writers for sure. I’ll give you a reference if you’d like?
@CodyC363@NaviGoBoom I am now humbled
Please point me to his research so I can educate myself
I obviously didn’t realize he was the leading expert in the matter
@RecklessSquirel@NaviGoBoom Let me clarify my stance. Shot a lot of both. They are negligible
Difference is chamber pressure. The one metric none of us have the equipment to test
Shoot what you want my man. Will anything happen? Maybe not. Were you told not to?
Absolutely
@Nap51M@NaviGoBoom Glad you brought this up my friend
Why does .223, shooting CFE 223 powder rated with a target of 3100 fps need 27.1 gn of powder
Were 5.56, shooting CFE 223 powder rated with a target of 3100 fps need 25.9 gn of powder
??
Pressure?
@RecklessSquirel@NaviGoBoom Nah
Just saying he is basing his argument on data he can’t verify. Manufacturer is calling it 5.56. I’ll trust their rating
If it’s a .223 load IDC
Bottom line up front. If someone says it’s a 5.56 cartridge I’ll treat it as such. How it performs, I’ll decide