@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes I'm not saying I taught you this I'm just saying that this is why maybe it should matter to you. And I think Ellie was just trying to say the same thing. That was our message all along.
@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes I'm having a hard time understanding how your original message had anything to do with the British royalty being an oppressive and tyrannical authority.
@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes I do so love your candid tone. I'm still trying to figure out which tenet you're following here. Do I detect a hint of benevolence? Is that compassion or empathy you're showing me?
@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes Here I thought we were all about compassion, empathy, science, justice, being informed & socially conscientious people and oh yeah - rejecting tyrannical authority. Sorry I asked why you don't or won't put two and to together.
@koresatanist@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes Hi @koresatanist. Except now, on this moment, he can't or won't move on and talk about why it might be important to learn about this situation. My current question is why is that the case? I've been asking this but getting the run around. Is this vilifying?
@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes Yes. Why do you feel it is a good course of action to avoid learning about a current event, publicly declare that you refuse to learn about it, and then get upset when someone asks why?
@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes You could reconsider how you treat others and people who disagree with online. You could strive to treat people with compassion and empathy. You could dig a little deeper in wonder why people care about this topic (maybe it's a pursuit of justice) but nah, you do you.
@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes Okay, cool. Arguing in circles, restating that which has already been stated, and refusing to consider you might be wrong or biased. Got it. ๐
@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes The fact that you defend your biased view to the death and all your worshippers are doing the same as really pathetic. I thought you wrote this tenants maybe you should carefully reread them.
@LucienGreaves @EllieLevesque @nytimes I don't think we need you to explain that any further we're asking you to explain something totally different. Considering you are smart man I'm surprised you haven't picked up on this.