Sherry Terlecki

🇺🇸FREEDOM🗽LIBERTY🥰HAPPINESS
Let the truth be seen.
I believe the truth on X, will FREE us all. 🇺🇸

[🔥🇺🇸 KC 🇺🇸🔥 @KCPayTreeIt]

Facts! 💯 This needs corrected asap! These traitors must be eradicated from our government.

[C3 @C_3C_3]

I know more about Nikki Floris in 12 hours than I know about Thomas Crooks in 734 days…

Wonder why?

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

China was BLACKMAILING Biden WH officials so they would take a “restrained” approach to China

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

If the Senate doesn’t pass the SAVE America Act,

I’m going to need your help replacing Senator Lankford in Oklahoma.

He’s up for re-election in 2028.

No Senator is invulnerable — peacefully.

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

Always get a second opinion before sinus surgery!

I see so many patients who haven’t been fully evaluated and are rushed to surgery, only to find a few months later that the surgery didn’t help.

Surgery doesn’t fix inflammation!

[DocumentingLibs @HistorianUSA1]

These child “protection” agencies are a disgrace and a menace.

Iowa mom gives birth. Umbilical cord comes back positive for cocaine. She has never touched the drug. Multiple independent hair tests covering her entire pregnancy come back clean. House is clean. Zero evidence of use.

Doesn’t matter.

DHS storms in unannounced, threatens to snatch her babies, puts her on the child abuse registry anyway, ignores court-ordered retesting, and tries to force her into secret “services.” The hospital and lab straight-up ignore a court order. Case still marked “founded.”

This is not a bug. This is the system.
Child protective services have become a predatory bureaucracy that ruins innocent families while failing the kids who are actually being beaten and starved. They operate with near-zero accountability, weaponize false positives, and treat parents as guilty until proven otherwise — then ignore the proof.

There are decent, well-meaning people trapped inside these agencies. The institutions themselves are broken, power-drunk, and do more harm than good. Full stop.

[Alexander Duncan @AlexDuncanTX]

Islam must be eradicated from Texas!

[Kari Lake @KariLake]

In Arizona, when my daughter turned 13, we went to the bank to open a saving account for her only to find out her social security number was already attached to a bank account— one opened fraudulently by an illegal alien who stole her social security number.

Thank you @POTUS @SecScottBessent @StephenM for working to stop this.

[♱Nial☈ @Nialfire]

@DerrickEvans4WV I agree. Voting should be a right that needs to be secured by contributing to the USA. Thise who merely TAKE should have no say.

[Tim Robinson @TimRobi01971715]

@DerrickEvans4WV Agreed! People on government assistance vote democrat, so they don't have to work! That's buying votes!

[Alberta-Leonidas @AlbertaLeonidas]

@DerrickEvans4WV civil servant's should not be allowed to vote

they will always vote for more gov

[♀️ IAmLookingBackAtYou 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🇩🇪 🇹🇷 @WeRAmerica2022]

@DerrickEvans4WV I agree with that idea. The perpetual lazy who refuse to work but have adopted a lifestyle of constant taxpayer funded complacency, should not be allowed to vote for those facilitating it.

[Scott Dideon @sdideon1]

@DerrickEvans4WV This is how our republic was first set up, in a sense. Only the families that owned land could vote. Maybe not ideal though since it only allowed men and excluded a lot of honest hard working individuals

But the point of having some skin in the game is valid.

[GwinnettWit @Gwinnett_wit]

@DerrickEvans4WV “If you paid taxes last year, or have paid taxes at least 20 years (non consecutive) you get to vote.”

This would solve so many problems.

[cyepler @cyepler]

@DerrickEvans4WV I’m not saying we should go back to this, but originally only landowners could vote because they were considered to be the ones with skin in the game.

[Tom Wyatt @TomRWyatt]

@DerrickEvans4WV Agree. If you didn't pay into the system, you shouldn't have any say how other people's money is spent.

[BitcoinBagLady 🇺🇸 @larkspur33]

@DerrickEvans4WV People that live off the government 99% of the time vote for the party & candidates that give them more free things with no contribution.
The consequences are that more tax money comes out of working class pockets & into the ungrateful freeloaders and illegals.

[zatarra @Zatarra8675309]

My plan:
W-2 is your "household voting ticket"
If you have one for the previous year, your spouse, voting age children and yourself can vote.
Retired citizens retain their right to vote.

If you're "pulling the wagon" you can help choose the path.
If you're "sitting in the wagon eating free cheese" you can shutup and eat the cheese.

This obviously prevents the whole "vote for me and I'll give you (insert lie here)" scheme. Of course, Many politicians will hate this idea. Thats the point.

[Not A Commie @BIG_PARMENIDES]

@DerrickEvans4WV Yes, it’s a conflict of interest, they will always vote for government to take more from those who are self sufficient.

[Derrick Evans @DerrickEvans4WV]

Only people who work or own land should be allowed to vote.

Retired people count as they also worked and paid taxes etc.

People who live off the government should not be allowed to vote.