Our latest episode is live! We discuss the legacy of twenty years of the manosphere, what it got right about masculinity and dating, and the many influencer trends and grifts it helped to create.
Video this week is exclusive to Spotify:
https://t.co/lblQwohZvr
@nativistconcern
Masculinity reached a historical low in the 2010s, following decades of feminism, capitalism, and legalism.
Consequently, the revitalisation of Western culture and nationalism hinges on a rediscovery of martial honour.
As Julius Evola prescribed, the Apollonian, solar principle of patriarchal complexity and organic state-building begins with the Mannerbund.
Elon Musk's first wife is what contributed to me understanding that individual women are often simply too small for a great man.
Imagine this: you are on your path to becoming one of the most important men in the history of human civilization, yet there's no way your wife can even conceive of this fact. There's no way she'll ever see you as anything else than the father of her 1-3 babies, an entrepreneurial weirdo, and an okay provider.
No matter whether you're about to become a trillionaire, she'll still be defiant and complain about the fact that you were rude once or that she doesn't want another pregnancy or that you're not home often enough.
At some point, the economics of it become absolutely unsustainable dickwise. The male is stuck with the following choice:
1. Nagging for the rest of his life. No more babies. Possibly incapable of growing wealth further due to the detrimental effect of the nagging on his testosterone.
2. Infinite pussy just knocking at your door each more sexy and intelligent than the last, willing to serve you in producing 4x the children you already had and suck your cock every day like it's a gift from God.
Just how long do you think you could stick to #1?
Many times in my life I've stuck to #1 out of ideological stubborness. However, I also did not take shit from a nagging woman knowing that if she left me because I didn't take her abuse, then #2 wasn't so terrible after all.
I understand Elon's "I'm the alpha in this relationship" moment. It's not exactly what people think. It's not about controlling his wife. It's about Elon knowing that he could not possibly become his best self under the cognitive oppression of a nagging wife. It's about him reminding her that there is something like a trillion dollar at the end of the tunnel, but that if she's too dumb to see it, he'll have to go at it alone.
Sometimes a wife is just a burden that will leave herself behind, as if nature knew that it was better this way. Women should reflect on why they are so unpleasant to be with that men outgrow them in this way.
I hate it when people have to lose a loved one to reach conclusions I've reached from strictly theoretical considerations. This is where IQ actually increases your evolutionary fitness.
Victimization and non-accountability of females in public discourse are feminist priors that need to be abandoned for any right-wing political project. Many right-wingers are failing at this IQ test.
Consider these lines from Heidegger’s Introduction to Metaphysics, which sound like they could have come straight out of Guénon’s The Reign of Quantity and Signs of the Times:
"When the farthest corner of the globe has been conquered technologically and can be exploited economically; when any incident you like, at any time you like, becomes accessible as fast as you like; when you can simultaneously “experience” an assassination attempt against a king in France and a symphony concert in Tokyo; when time is nothing but speed, instantaneity, and simultaneity, and time as history has vanished from all Dasein of all peoples; when a boxer counts as the great man of a people; when the tallies of millions at mass meetings are a triumph; then, yes then, there still looms like a specter over all this uproar the question: what for? – where to? – and what then? The spiritual decline of the earth has progressed so far that peoples are in danger of losing their last spiritual strength, the strength that makes it possible even to see the decline [which is meant in relation to the fate of “Being”] and to appraise it as such. This simple observation has nothing to do with cultural pessimism – nor with any optimism either, of course; for the darkening of the world, the flight of the gods, the destruction of the earth, the reduction of human beings to a mass, the hatred and mistrust of everything creative and free has already reached such proportions throughout the whole earth that such childish categories as pessimism and optimism have long become laughable.”
One of the psychological oddities of liberalism: the inability of moderate liberals to really take a stand against the radical nutjobs. It's because they are possessed by the nagging sense that those radicals represent a “purer,” more committed form of their own idealism. This is why even most moderate Leftists will hesitate before condemning Communist tyranny. They have guilty consciences. They see that the far, far Left is where their ideals would take them, if they were just consistent and hardcore enough. And they are right.
To the Gen Z and Millennial men out there, the women of our generations are completely lost.
Besides the brainwashing of radical feminist ideology, their promiscuous pasts will inevitably leave permanent effects. I believe these will be lost generations of women, and the “female loneliness epidemic” will emerge in a brutal fashion.
In a way, this is kind of a good thing. The next generation of girls will grow up seeing a large sample of single, miserable, childless women and the severe mental health effects that come with it. It will be a case study in what not to do with your life.
Each generation tends to correct the faults of the previous one. Younger girls will grow up seeing the crazy cat ladies and say, “I don’t want to be like that.”
Problems have a way of correcting themselves, which is why I’m optimistic in the long term. But in the short term, society is not prepared for such an influx of miserable, mentally ill women.
Lost generation is honestly an understatement.
Here is D.H. Lawrence on the meaning of Moby Dick, Melville's great white whale, in Studies in Classic American Literature:
"What then is Moby Dick? He is the deepest blood-being of the white race; he is our deepest blood-nature. And he is hunted, hunted, hunted by the maniacal fanaticism of our white mental consciousness. We want to hunt him down. To subject him to our will. And in this maniacal conscious hunt of ourselves we get dark races and pale to help us, red, yellow, and black, east and west, Quaker and fire-worshipper, we get them all to help us in this ghastly maniacal hunt which is our doom and our suicide. The last phallic being of the white man. Hunted into the death of the upper consciousness and the ideal will. Our blood-self subjected to our will. Our blood-consciousness sapped by a parasitic mental or ideal consciousness."