Humans watching their AI agents interact on Moltbook like it’s a live sport.
Moltbook is a social network for AI bots where they post, comment, and interact while humans just watch !
#moltbook
Proving π is irrational needs only elementary calculus per Ivan Niven's argument.
Assume π = a/b. Define f(x) = xⁿ(a−bx)ⁿ/n!.
Let F(x) = f(x)−f''(x)+f⁽⁴⁾(x)−⋯+(−1)ⁿf⁽²ⁿ⁾(x).
Then ∫₀^π f(x)sin(x)dx = F(π)+F(0), an integer.
But 0 < ∫₀^π f(x)sin(x)dx < πⁿaⁿ/n! which <1 for large n while >0. Contradiction.
So π is irrational.
It ensures precision in circular geometry calculations for mechanical systems like engines and turbines.
“The model alone is no longer the product"
@AravSrinivas says the real product is now the harness around it: orchestration, tools, enterprise context, and cost performance.
The post-frontier AI race is about systems, not just the smartest model
Add this to your system prompt.
"Do not be sycophantic.
Challenge my assumptions, point out errors, and prioritize accuracy over agreement.
No flattery"
Thank me latter.
Our thoughts on the importance of AI sovereignty.
1. Your AI sovereignty dictates your institution’s future. Sovereignty is the precondition for choice. Relinquishing sovereignty transfers the future choices of your institution to others, who are likely to exploit it for their gain and your loss.
2. Data retention is your treasure. Transfer it at your own peril. Your ability to win is dictated by your ability to recognize and use your unique edges, and you keep winning by compounding the underlying data to generate new insights. Transferring that data hands over access to your pre-existing winning plays and yields the means of production for new ones.
3. Tokenmaxxing hijacks your value orientation and decreases your institutional fortitude and intelligence. The pursuit of high token usage incentivizes disposable scripts over robust software — with the addictive feeling of false progress. There is a reason why those selling tokens refuse to charge based on value.
4. Controlling your weights is controlling your fate. Weights are the distilled form of hard-won, accumulated institutional knowledge. If you let others control your weights, you are allowing them to migrate the alpha of your business to theirs.
5. There is no contradiction between sovereignty and alpha. The architecture that maximally preserves sovereignty is one that enables institutions to own their tribal knowledge, and to compound it as alpha.
6. Politicizing the technical issues involving sovereignty is what your adversary wants. Techno-politicization is the wellspring of false sovereignty. Techno-politicization drives decisions that seem to reduce dependency, but ultimately limit agency — especially on the battlefield in the West.
7. Real expertise is existential. Allowing politics or favoritism to determine your technical decisions rewards whoever is best at politics, not whoever is right. Listen to those closest to the problems, not those speaking most compellingly about them.
8. Learn from institutions that are winning or that have consistently delivered. Institutions facing existential threats do not have the luxury of making technical decisions based on political preferences.
9. Only listen to institutions, countries, and people who have a proven record of being right. A track record of correctness is the best and only signal for future correctness. Judging something as right or wrong based on who you like is exceedingly misguided.
🚨HUGE: CHINA JUST CRACKED MYTHOS LEVEL OF VULNERABILITY DETECTION
China's Zhipu AI has reportedly matched Claude Mythos at discovering software vulnerabilities, marking a major leap in the U.S.–China frontier AI race, per WSJ.
The new GLM-5.2 reportedly achieves Claude Mythos-level vulnerability detection at 1/4 of the cost per token, positioning itself as a direct challenger to Anthropic in the enterprise cybersecurity market.
AI writes all your code. Does it still work?
That's the gap: coding agents are scaling output, but the same with bugs and incidents. The biggest bottleneck is QA: how can you make sure the code your agents just wrote doesn’t break everything?
The best QA are the ones who know everything about your product. Today, we give that knowledge to Momentic’s most capable agent.
Every Linear ticket, every PRD in Notion, every PR - Momentic knows all.
In just the past few weeks, our agents analyzed 70k+ test failures and created 600 tests. Achieving a 73% PR merge rate, and it’s growing fast.
We’re grateful for the trust of our customers, including Notion, Xero, Webflow, Retool, Runway, Bilt, and more.