The most sold item from Ali Express in the Gaza Strip is a PRESS VEST!
What you are watching is in reality a bunch of grifters who banked millions through GoFundMe campaigns
AP Exclusive: Humanitarians at Médecins Sans Frontières sexually exploit Sudanese underage girls in refugee camps, systematically targeting vulnerable victims of war. Internal report, buried for 11 months, suggests there was organized sexual trafficking.
https://t.co/li1jhrDo0k
My goodness. The coping is going hard.
This is the biggest American humiliation since Vietnam, with the potential to be even greater than Vietnam if the leaked deal details are anywhere near correct.
🚨 Alert: Major escalation ahead!
We are finally decoupling.
1. Going to war against Iran with the US as a partner would be excellent militarily - but highly problematic under Trump.
2. In the end, it all depends on the IRGC. The enemy always gets a vote.
3. If the IRGC fires missiles at Israel, the response will be harsh.
It’s important to understand what the IRGC has been trying to achieve:
A. They could have waited for the deal to be signed, knowing Israel would respond in Dahya if Hezbollah fired missiles into Israel.
B. Instead, to demonstrate their strength - and believing they had Trump on their side because he desperately wants a deal - they ordered Hezbollah to fire. They knew Israel would respond.
C. Their goal was to maneuver Trump exactly where he is now: forcing Israel to stand down. Classic escalation.
But here’s what they failed to calculate:
**The decoupling between Trump and Netanyahu.**
The IRGC still hasn’t understood what Israel has become after October 7th:
1. We don’t really care what Trump says or what his personal financial interests are - the stock market, oil prices, or any deals of Mr .@SteveWitkoff can have in Qatar.
2. We care about our security. We care about our School and Kindergarten Children. (got That .@JDVance ?) - When Hezbollah fires rockets or even builds the capability to harm Israelis or invade (as they planned), we protect our civilians.
3. If the IRGC makes the mistake of trying to create a linkage - “If Israel responds to Hezbollah, we will hit Israel” — they will quickly discover what the IDF can do when the US isn’t tying one hand behind our back.
For anyone who still hasn’t figured out what the next few hours hold: as I write this, Hezbollah has again fired on Israeli civilians in Manara and Kiryat Shmona. An Israeli response is coming, and the IRGC will have to decide.
The enemy always gets a vote.
But so do we.
The only one decoupling himself from the situation is Trump.
We live in the Middle East. Israel does not have the luxury of being separated from the rest of the world by two oceans.
Therefore, we fight.
And all they did was to break the law
How's your alliance holding up today, Zack ?
The one between the LBGTQ community and the most mediaeval misogynistic movement on the planet ?
A UN Special Rapporteur says there was a "concerted effort" inside the UN to prevent allegations from October 7 being formally recorded and that colleagues were bullied into not signing a letter documenting the atrocities.
When the world's leading human rights institution cannot honestly document the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, it has a credibility problem.
By @janeprinsley of the @JewishChron
https://t.co/l0X2Kq16Mx
We are fine with the normal people. Why would we have a problem with them?
We want to mass deport the Muslim Brotherhood fanatics that literally released a plan to take over Western civilization through immigration and high fertility rate.
They call it "civilizational jihad" and people are waking up to this reality.
https://t.co/RUqPFxhGo7
He murdered their father in front of their eyes.
He went to the family fridge and stole a drink.
Drank it in front of the terrified children.
The Gaza man who murdered Gil Ta'asa in Kibbutz Netiv Ha'asara is all I can think of when I see the hateful 🇵🇸 flag.
The Iranian regime, as always, is lying.
Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, is the one that attacked Israel again this morning, completely unprovoked.
Hezbollah constantly fires at Israeli civilians. Even after the ceasefire, Hezbollah has not stopped targeting Israelis. It was Hezbollah that launched an unprovoked attack on Israel in March, acting under the orders of its Iranian masters.
Israel will not tolerate firing at its territory.
The world is still fixated on Israel’s refusal of a mass Palestinian refugee return after 1948.
That’s not unusual.
What’s truly unusual is that this tiny, embattled new state took any back at all in the absence of a peace treaty.
That’s right. In the early 1950s, this tiny new state of 800,000 ran family reunification programs allowing ~35,000 Palestinian Arabs to return and become full Israeli citizens (whose descendants likely number 150K today Israeli citizens today).
35K was controversial at the time, as it amounted to ~4% of the Israel's total population, even as the country simultaneously absorbed hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees from the Middle East and Europe.
Compare that to other 20th-century partitions and displacement due to war:
• India and Pakistan had no comparable programs after 1947.
• Cyprus and Northern Cyprus did nothing after 1974.
• Europe offered no return for the millions of expelled ethnic Germans.
• And no Arab state ever created family reunification schemes for the 850,000 Jews they drove out.
The real historical anomaly isn’t “Why didn’t Israel let everyone back?” It’s why, amid ongoing war, security threats, and zero reciprocity, it let anyone back at all?
Part of the reason came from UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (Dec 1948), which became the bedrock of both UNRWA and the so-called "right of return" demand.
This non-binding resolution is highly unique in UN history and remains so:
• Passed during the height of the war, not after it.
• Not reciprocal (even as Jews were expelled from Jerusalem's Old City and other areas)
• Focused solely on Arab refugees "wishing to live at peace with their neighbors" with no reference to borders, citizenship or Jewish refugees.
Yet Israel actively sought to end the conflict.
At the 1949 Lausanne Conference, Israel offered to accept 100,000 Palestinian refugees in exchange for peace. It was rejected by the Arabs in favor of perpetual state of war and exile.
In retrospect, the timing of Resolution 194 in the middle of the war was disastrous for the Palestinians. By the end of the war, the Arab states had powerful international leverage to demand large-scale demographic reversal as a precondition to any peace talks. They never came.
Israel remains the only country singled out like this, which is why the Palestinian refugee situation remains "unresolved" in the minds of the UN and its member states, which affirm Resolution 194 every year since as if something is going to change.