@butchgendered@bundleofstyyx Maria lugones writes really beautifully on this to learn more, so does Kimberly Crenshaw herself, you are not “black + woman” you are a black woman, your woman hood is directly colored by your blackness and vice versa. “Black woman” itself bears its own unique experiences
@gloxxexi there's actual value in covering the topic, it's just that it...should probably be done by an actual trans or at least otherwise queer person, so i'm questioning if i want to give it my time 😭
idk why you're so against it outside of that tho
Redfems don’t want liberation they actually want to be assimilated into the oppressive class and it’s so glaring it’s gonna make me a black nationalist again
you have to have an immense amount of privilege to be trans. the time & privilege required to sit around pondering your gender identity…. very western! not a marginalized group whatsoever
“Sit around pondering your gender identity” one that’s all you do constantly, 2, that is literally what all feminists and radicals who are doing the work should do. Self introspection and critically analyzing your identity constantly is key
@bbswurld That makes sense, I think I have the innate urge to look at everything I see written retroactively from the standpoint of “you are speaking to the symposium” here when a lot of times people are sharing passing thoughts to their mutuals in which their substance is right so my bad
@bbswurld Yes and there are many names for the practical theories and systems that get us there ! I’m not attacking you and I agree completely with the basis of your point (I am an Afro pessimist) but I’m saying there are many applied and theoretical practical methods for
@bbswurld -liberation that can be seen as direct inferences, or directly interlinked or building upon afropessimism to actualize liberatory ideals! But engaging in systems emerged from analytical practices immediately implies those systems are distinct in some way from said practice