@GringoInvesting@PlaneAdmirer As for choke management comment, not meant to be excuse for public data issue, simply providing background as to why internal data for 2024 (shallower than normal drawdown) looks different than 2020-2023 and 2025 (normal drawdown)
@GringoInvesting@PlaneAdmirer Unique to EXE though, 2024 was a split year with some CHK and some SWN data. SWN reported the way that broke, so their data stopped. This is a important distinction because it’s highest productivity in entire state. So in public data, EXE looks worse YoY and so does entire basin.
@GringoInvesting@PlaneAdmirer I think you might be missing the entire point of the slide, which is that LA state data for 2024 and 2025 is currently incorrect because of a reporting issue inside the DENR. It impacts multiple operators in the state, this slide simply shows what it actually is for EXE.
@JamieHeard5 Oddly enough it’s most of our Legacy SWN 2024 wellset pre-close, which is the highest productivity acreage in the state. From what I can tell, also impacts BPX, GEP, CRK, and Aethon.
@JamieHeard5 Would also offer up that Haynesville cycle times are longggg, so unless you built productive capacity to address this, the volumes won’t materialize until late 2025.
@JamieHeard5 Agree with all components of your first bullet. Consolidation, producer discipline, and private actions have all changed basin dynamics.
I will point out that LA is significantly behind on prod data and the publicly available 2024 wellset is <40% of TILs - productivity is fine.
@JamieHeard5@BowTiedFeline Agree. Additionally on 2, Matterhorn dumps gas to Katy in West Houston which has very limited connectivity to the Gulf currently. It’s Permian egress sure, but impacts Katy and HSC more than anything.