👇🏽👂🏽🎙Short clip with really important emphasis and explanations from @psinergy_SDW 💥"You can't even wake up in the morning or go through your day without your cells using your internet service provider to communicate with one another. " No time to "wake up", time to utilize and build on the information you are learning without fear and suppression. Full video: https://t.co/N4xNh8odej #biocyberinterface #RFK #biofield #aura #biological #humanaugmentation #biodigitalconvergence
White Supremacy or Extinction?
In recent years the term 'White Supremacy' has been sweeping through mainstream news, being funneled into our commercials, blasted throughout social media, and crammed down the throats of anyone with the gall to simply proclaim "it's okay to be White" (a slogan now found on the Anti-Defamation Leagues 'hate database'.)
Before we can properly grasp the usage of this term, and understand why it has become so commonplace, we must first understand the meaning of it.
And so we ask: What does it mean to be supreme?
Supreme, by dictionary definition is that which is greatest in power, importance, significance, character, or achievement. Think for example of the Supreme court in the United States which is the highest court in the land.
Now that we understand the definition of the term, we must analyze its usage in the modern context. Typically, when modern academics, journalists, or media blockheads use the term 'White Supremacist', they use it to imply that the person being labelled as such is a violent psychopath looking to exterminate any non-white individual and conquer the world. However, as we have stated earlier, it is considered 'White Supremacy' by mainstream standards to advocate white people merely continuing to exist on Earth.
This is where we run into a great fork in the road; either accept the takeover of your homelands by people of different character, cultures, and beliefs, or oppose this on the grounds of continuing your people's existence and be called a 'White Supremacist'. The answer here seems quite rhetorical. Why allow the greatest culture bearing people in the last two thousand years to be demographically replaced and lose their material power in this world? Unfortunately, the rhetorical answer is not clear to all, therefore we will aim here to make it clear for them.
To be a supremacist in your homeland is not only morally correct, it is a necessary prerequisite to secure a future for your people. Anyone with a brain should expect Vietnamese people to be supreme in Vietnam, Kenyan's to be supreme in Kenya, and Indian's to be supreme in India. Why does this become different in the case of the collective white countries? Why is it that the English people, the German people, and the French are all expected to allow other groups to take high office inside of their countries and are labelled 'White Supremacist' if they do not do so? Would anyone call it Vietnamese Supremacy if the Vietnamese people didn't want a white mayor or a white president?
Clearly there is a demonstrable bias in which only one group is not allowed the privilege of having a homeland to truly call their own. This is not in consonance with the so called 'equality' that the same modern scholars who whine about 'White Supremacy' seem to care so much about. In no place is the bias more clear than America. Black only colleges, businesses, dating apps, websites, etc. exist and openly promote themselves as black only without any claims of 'Black Supremacy'. For example, 'Black People Meet' which is a black only dating site that operates without any claims of "supremacy" is completely accepted morally. However, 'Where White People Meet' a white only dating site that was launched in 2015, had articles written by nearly every mainstream news source, calling for them to shut down the business and claiming it to be morally unsound, a clear hypocrisy.
If we are to accept this new social trend which not only tells White people they cannot have ingroup preference in finance and politics, but that they can't even breed amongst their own, the consequences are quite evident. Simply put, we go extinct. We will slowly lose all of our political power, which in turn will rob us of our material power, leading us to be politically and financially ruled over by people who don't even think it moral for us to breed and exist on this Earth.
This leads us to a very clear conclusion: We either become White supremacists, having control over our own sovereignty and destiny, or we go extinct in fear of being called such.
The choice is for us to make. This is genetic life or death. Did your ancestors achieve all they have for nothing? Has all of the progress we have made in this world been in vain? Have we the right to live?
Choose wisely, and choose now.
Jews want criticism of themselves and their nation of Israel to be illegal.
Unfortunately we have the First Amendment, which allows it.
Which is why they are equating criticism of jews and Israel to terrorism, declaring your right to criticize them a national security threat
‼️🚨☦️🇷🇺 Russian Orthodox Christians have begun checking the ‘Early Life section’ on the Bolshevik Communist Wikipedia pages.
A noticing is taking place.