The following prompt should provide similar results with any AI platform.
The results confirm Candace Owens' suspicion that the DQ photo was taken earlier in the day than was first suspected.
I provided the following prompt and Tyler Robinson's DQ photo to Gemini AI and got the following response. I encourage everyone to double check these results.
Prompt:
Analyze the accompanying image to estimate the general time of day based on natural lighting geometry, using the following observational parameters and constraints:
1. Primary Light Source Identification: - Observe the stark, high-contrast illumination and sharp light-to-shadow gradients visible on the subject's face, neck, and exposed arms. - Note that this level of directional intensity and sharp contrast is inconsistent with flat, diffuse indoor commercial lighting or standard overhead fixtures. Instead, assume the primary light source is direct natural sunlight entering the space from an off-camera opening (such as a large window or entryway).
2. Temporal and Seasonal Constraints: - Assume the date is September 10th. Assume the location is Orem, Utah. Consider the solar declination and typical seasonal daylight trajectory for the Northern Hemisphere on this date.
3. Shadow Geometry and Angle Analysis: - Examine the shadow cast by the subject's cap brim onto their forehead and eyes. Determine the vertical elevation angle of the light source required to project that specific downward angle. - Evaluate the lateral angle of the highlights on the skin and clothing relative to the assumed position of the light source.
4. Conclusion Requirements: - Synthesize these observations to estimate a general time window with hourly bounds.
Gemini Response:
Based on the lighting analysis parameters, the geographical location (Orem, Utah), the seasonal date (September 10th), and the physical geometry of the shadows, we can deduce the approximate time window:
Time Estimation Window: 11:00 AM – 3:00 PM
Analytical Rationale:
Vertical Elevation & Hat Brim Shadow: The shadow cast by the cap's brim cuts sharply and closely across the eyes and upper nose bridge. For a downward-projected shadow of this relative depth on a face, the light source must be at a moderately high elevation angle (roughly 40° to 52° above the horizon).
Solar Trajectory for September 10th: In Orem, Utah, on September 10th, solar noon (when the sun reaches its highest point in the sky at an altitude of approximately 52°) occurs around 1:23 PM.
Correlation with Light Intensity: An altitude range between 40° and 52° corresponds precisely to the window between 11:00 AM and 3:00 PM. Outside of this window (such as early morning or late afternoon), the sun's lower elevation angle would project much longer, more acute horizontal shadows across the face or require a direct lateral beam that would fail to clear the cap's downward brim projection in this manner.
@Proselytizer18 I am having trouble finding all the videos Smartski is using. I think I have front balcony, left balcony, near right and Far left. Please provide video names and or locations for the other videos with good audio of the gunshot. Thank You.
Good News! Chat GPT is able to analyze video and audio files for gunshot cracks and muzzle blasts. Chat GPT preliminary results are that there are no supersonic cracks recorded, only one muzzle blast was recorded. All other sound peaks are echoes. If true, this means that Tyler Robinson likely never fired a bullet and that the kill shot was a subsonic round fired from close by! Anyone can confirm this at the free level. Best to load short clips (1-2 secs) to avoid the upload limits. I hope to make a more thorough analysis in the next week. Will keep you updated.
These findings will need confirmation by a high level audio expert. If true, most posters on X are mistaking the muzzle blast peak for a sonic crack. Without the sonic crack the distance to shooter can not be estimated.
Good News! Chat GPT is able to analyze video and audio files for gunshot cracks and muzzle blasts. Chat GPT preliminary results are that there are no supersonic cracks recorded, only one muzzle blast was recorded. All other sound peaks are echoes. If true, this means that Tyler Robinson likely never fired a bullet and that the kill shot was a subsonic round fired from close by! Anyone can confirm this at the free level. Best to load short clips (1-2 secs) to avoid the upload limits. I hope to make a more thorough analysis in the next week. Will keep you updated.
These findings will need confirmation by a high level audio expert. If true, most posters on X are mistaking the muzzle blast peak for a sonic crack. Without the sonic crack the distance to shooter can not be estimated.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Excellent work Proselytizer! What accounts for the 4 high amplitude, short duration events at the left balcony? It appears as though there were 4 supersonic gunshots! Muzzle blasts are lower amplitude and longer duration. Echoes and reflections are lower amplitude. Speaker… <a href="https://t.co/Jdttbj3pDR">https://t.co/Jdttbj3pDR</a></p>— TJ Prescott (@TJPrescottDC) <a href="https://t.co/6wOZEuXxPO">September 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://t.co/bYo7fvn9Vo" charset="utf-8"></script>
Excellent work Proselytizer! What accounts for the 4 high amplitude, short duration events at the left balcony? It appears as though there were 4 supersonic gunshots! Muzzle blasts are lower amplitude and longer duration. Echoes and reflections are lower amplitude. Speaker repeats are lower amplitude. Fireworks are longer duration. Additional gunshots appear the only explanation! Were there additional shooters or were bullitts fired from drones to confuse the audio investigation?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Excellent work Proselytizer! What accounts for the 4 high amplitude, short duration events at the left balcony? It appears as though there were 4 supersonic gunshots! Muzzle blasts are lower amplitude and longer duration. Echoes and reflections are lower amplitude. Speaker… <a href="https://t.co/Jdttbj3pDR">https://t.co/Jdttbj3pDR</a></p>— TJ Prescott (@TJPrescottDC) <a href="https://t.co/6wOZEuXxPO">September 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://t.co/bYo7fvn9Vo" charset="utf-8"></script>
Excellent work Proselytizer! What accounts for the 4 high amplitude, short duration events at the left balcony? It appears as though there were 4 supersonic gunshots! Muzzle blasts are lower amplitude and longer duration. Echoes and reflections are lower amplitude. Speaker repeats are lower amplitude. Fireworks are longer duration. Additional gunshots appear the only explanation! Were there additional shooters or were bullitts fired from drones to confuse the audio investigation?
Excellent work Proselytizer! What accounts for the 4 high amplitude, short duration events at the left balcony? It appears as though there were 4 supersonic gunshots! Muzzle blasts are lower amplitude and longer duration. Echoes and reflections are lower amplitude. Speaker repeats are lower amplitude. Fireworks are longer duration. Additional gunshots appear the only explanation! Were there additional shooters or were bullitts fired from drones to confuse the audio investigation?
Excellent work Proselytizer! What accounts for the 4 high amplitude, short duration events at the left balcony? It appears as though there were 4 supersonic gunshots! Muzzle blasts are lower amplitude and longer duration. Echoes and reflections are lower amplitude. Speaker repeats are lower amplitude. Fireworks are longer duration. Additional gunshots appear the only explanation! Were there additional shooters or were bullitts fired from drones to confuse the audio investigation?
The clarity in pattern and higher volume of audio waveforms from various videos of Charlie Kirk's assassination support the theory that the shooter was to CK's right and relatively close.
The official narrative places the shooter in a location that shows waveform patterns that are significantly less clear and lower in volume.
The second sound, which some theorize is the 'thump' in a 'crack-thump' pattern, is more simply explained as a microphone echo of the gunshot. This would explain why the second sound is unique to each video but matches the sound of the gunshot in that video.
"Acoustic gunshot signals exhibit significant variation according to the azimuth [horizontal distance]." - Tushar Routh and Robert Maher, Recording anechoic gunshot waveforms of several firearms at 500 kilohertz sampling rate
"According to the results, a decreasing of the volume, equivalent to the increasing of the distance, was remarked, as it was expected." - Nikolaos, Tsiatis E., Recording and Calculating Gunshot Sound—Change of the Volume in Reference to the Distance
The clarity in pattern and higher volume of audio waveforms from various videos of Charlie Kirk's assassination support the theory that the shooter was to CK's right and relatively close.
The official narrative places the shooter in a location that shows waveform patterns that are significantly less clear and lower in volume.
The second sound, which some theorize is the 'thump' in a 'crack-thump' pattern, is more simply explained as a microphone echo of the gunshot. This would explain why the second sound is unique to each video but matches the sound of the gunshot in that video.
"Acoustic gunshot signals exhibit significant variation according to the azimuth [horizontal distance]." - Tushar Routh and Robert Maher, Recording anechoic gunshot waveforms of several firearms at 500 kilohertz sampling rate
"According to the results, a decreasing of the volume, equivalent to the increasing of the distance, was remarked, as it was expected." - Nikolaos, Tsiatis E., Recording and Calculating Gunshot Sound—Change of the Volume in Reference to the Distance
There is a potential second sniper visible at roof edge to the right of the stage and directly in line with Zeb's projection of the muzzle flash. The location is the intersection of 7 separate sound projections. The sniper can be seen on YT “Livestream Captures Moment of Deadly Shooting" Timestamps: 8:50 – 9:17 & 9:55 – 10:32 and YT "PROOF that Charlie Kirk's shooter had a SPOTTER" Timestamps: 2:15 – 2:30.
Here is another version with (7) mic locations plotted vs (3), it gets crowded but for transparency I felt it was important to showcase some more angles plotted as well.
Even at max error margin, a shot from the rooftop simply doesn't match the audio.