@pegobry_en Some of the best people I know are psychiatrists
(Qualification: good psychiatrists >>> normal doctors; bad psychiatrists <<< normal doctors)
@armor123123@Gravantus You've actually got me here... in dashing off my comment, I took the opportunity-- however tendentious-- to demonstrate our cause!
@SwannMarcus89 Equity =/= equality (that old, tired liberal Anglo ideal)
"Equality" only exacerbates inequities! (Understood as proportionate outcomes, absolute of all considerations)
So, to hell with equality: proactive discrimination seeking EQUITY is the answer
Unleash Procrustes...
@kevingatesfan09@poornapatel2@PanAmComintern Actually, the fact that you put "native" in triplicate quotation marks is a (ahem) triple red flag: don't bother replying
The fact that you don't understand why MASS IMMIGRATION FROM FOREIGN CULTURES is different than native proliferation (????) tells me yr a relative headcase
@ZachariahSchwab@LinkofSunshine I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on what constitutes absolutely (ie spiritually, morally, etc.) value-laden "racialized" statements, as a non-white "HBD-pilled" American reactionary myself
IMO nothing he ever professed suggested true opposition to miscegenation, etc
@ZachariahSchwab@LinkofSunshine Of those j'accus'ing him, I observe that minority groyperesque faction ganging up with already-hostile liberals/progressives/leftists who poorly understand reactionary thinking generally
@ZachariahSchwab@LinkofSunshine I think it's true enough that by merely having an unapologetic reactionary account, one attracts some fraction of actual white nationalists/personal-affective racists
But I don't think that was 1) the majority of his following, or 2) the PoV implicitly displayed via his posts
@YosarianTwo@morallawwithin Unless you are immortal by nature, this is something you (a mortal by nature) need to accept: even entities from sci-fi scenarios that posit the material perpetuation of the bodily (or somehow post-bodily) self are still radically subject to dissolution... by nature
@ZachariahSchwab@LinkofSunshine Like someone caught in a dream, you don't know what you do hallucinate because you take your illusions for granted
Please gloss why you think the above entails "white people being above non white people"
@muffincookiepie@sjsyxydhsj@PanAmComintern These people are like those who can't distinguish JWs from Unitarian Universalists
They apparently can't fathom being opposed to mass, indiscriminate immigration (whether actual, or potentially in principle!) and not being some personally, affectively racist white nationalist
@poornapatel2@PanAmComintern Your point is uncharitable innuendo and rhetorical insistence on reframing
So yeah, I'm telling you to fuck off putting words in my (and others') mouth while you refuse to answer a simple fucking question, which I KNOW you understand
Now fuck off, sneerlord
@poornapatel2@PanAmComintern You are missing the point because yr febrile; the question concerns *any* mass immigration, current or prospective, and is explicitly framed in such a theoretical manner
Now so answer: does being opposed to mass immigration from X so entail "personal loathing"?
Stop redirecting