@sigmaxyzwm1618@jamie_saris@AntiquarianMuse Yes. But ARIMA is best when the environment we live in is pretty constant. But if we know there will be huge paradigm shifts, it becomes more difficult to predict that way.
@glennbeck Correct. And that 2% profit margin is with more efficiently run companies. There is no such thing as free anything. You always actually paid for those "free" toys inside the cereal boxes.
The opposite. Having more than a few family and friends with aspergers, He seems pretty typical in that regard. To the uneducated, he can seem to be what you are saying, but actually he takes time to think before speaking. Also in line with aspergers is to think in terms of logic and probilities. Which includes the probability of being wrong. I would bet he is more comfortable being wrong than you are.
It DID start in the universities. And not the real science professors like the physicists, mathematicians, and computer scientists. It was the social "scientists" that had to keep finding ways to "discover" something to show they were smart and worthy of tenure. So of course they have to find something antithetical to the current status quo. You see this played out all the time. And its invented by them.
@guyfelicella Its not an all or nothing equation. Of course there are some advancements, and I didnt claim there weren't. What I did say is where we got to where we are now- its not socialism.
Wow. I've never seen so many people lack the understanding of what got the human race to where it is now, the things we obviously take for granted. The medical advancements, the ability to travel so easily, howneasybitnis to communicate to anyone in the world,how plentiful food is, how ubiquitous energy is, and it wasn't socialism.
@lukepbeasley The only reason any socialist country even APPEARS to work is that they are overall net exporters of either human labor resources or natural resources to more capitalist countries. Socialist economies always need another country to feed off of, like a lampry on a whale.
Ever notice they always say there was no WIDESPREAD election fraud? Because all it takes is fraud in one precinct with how close elections are. And you beyyer beleive that with all of the data we have now, one woukd know EXACTLY which precinct to target to sway a state. It actually can be fraud in a very small strategic spot, NOT widespread.