Yesterday, this Russian military officer was blown up in his car in St. Petersburg.
Sergei Sechkov was the deputy commander of Russia’s 332nd Separate Guards Helicopter Regiment, a unit involved in missile and bomb strikes against civilians in Ukraine’s Kharkiv and Sumy regions.
According to Ukrainian sources, Sechkov personally flew Mi-24 attack helicopters, planned flight routes and combat missions, and took part in the assault on Hostomel Airport at the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion. He was also reportedly involved in fighting in the Zaporizhzhia direction and during the Kursk operation.
His father confirmed his death to journalists. Sechkov’s wife, Anna, was also in the car and was injured in the explosion.
If you could address the points levied against you, you would.
Since you don't, its most likely you cannot.
But hey if you ever found some courage we could set up a convo with yall sometime im sure :)
I think this moment is an opportunity for dems to expose how fraudulent these people are because they have to commit to increasingly ridiculous positions to keep this charade going.
Nobody, and especially not Hasan himself, would dispute that he is antagonistic towards dems lol.
I've been permanently banned from @Twitch for about 3 years because I said a particular group of militant trans-activists online were "inbred" and that they don't represent the average trans person.
The CEO, @djclancy999, is personal friends with @hasanthehun though, and the two of them are pretty motivated to keep me banned from the site.
The last time I applied for an unban, the Trust and Safety actually granted it and unbanned my account, but Hasan saw I was unbanned, started nervously texting/messaging Clancy, and then Clancy manually rebanned me from the website lol.
Authoritarian types can only exist in echo chambers because they cannot stand to be critically confronted, ever. It's why @hasanthehun avoids any challenging interviews, and why the types like @mehdirhasan will avoid answering actually critical questions from people with the knowledge to question them.
Blind partisans everywhere.
@mehdirhasan will not meaningfully respond to this tweet, because he cannot. Unfortunately, he's built a sizeable part of his career in the last few years by giving infinite, unconditional cover to people who are supportive of these terrorist groups, and now he cannot meaningfully engage with criticism in this direction.
It's sad, because if you know anything about Mehdi, he is one of the most brutal and effective interviewers when confronting people on the right. Yet he gives a totally free pass to extremists he views as...more ideologically inline with him? Or more on his side, politically? Or...what?
Tell me, what are we supposed to make of it when you give a free pass to a person who openly worships and cheers on terrorist attacks? Why can't you answer this question?
You're upset I said you were a "mask-on Islamist" for supporting mask-off Islamic terrorist supporters, and in the next breath call me "pro-genocide" because...I disagree that Israel should be a single, Muslim majority state? What? How does that make sense?
Why can't you address your lack of criticism for:
Hasan openly cheering on a civilian vessel hijacking? Those hostages were held for over 400 days, and they had nothing to do with Israel. He interviewed someone he believed to be a Houthi and laughed about it the entire time.
Hasan openly cheering on the sabotage of RAF planes in the UK? Those planes were headed for Ukraine. You thought it was improper for the UK to suspend his ETA Visa waiver when Hasan had literally cheered for a UK-designated terrorist group attacking their own air force bases.
Hasan giving blanket support to the Houthis to attack civilians? They were attacking any civilian ship they could, it had nothing to do with "stopping the genocide".
Hasan saying he doesn't have a problem with Hezbollah and supports them in their fight against Israel? He says they're a legitimate part of Lebanon?
Or are you going to retreat to your usual defence of Hasan and say these are "out of context" or "edgy jokes" again, since you are utterly incapable of explaining away any of this without saying you are providing cover for terrorist organizations?
Hey Rudy, tell us about the $300,000 that Pavlo Fuks paid you in 2017.
According to press reports and an FBI whistleblower disclosure to the Senate, the man who paid you was a Russian intelligence asset and Putin bag man. Within a year you were flying around Europe working with other Russian intelligence assets accusing my family of corruption. You can’t make this shit up.
Who is Fuks? The FBI assessed him as a co-opted asset of Russian intelligence who laundered money for sanctioned Russian entities. He ran propaganda for Moscow inside Ukraine, including funding a false flag operation that painted swastikas across Kharkiv so the Kremlin could tell the world Ukraine was run by Nazis.
The U.S. banned Fuks from the country over ties to Russian organized crime. Zelensky sanctioned him. He was also Trump’s would-be partner on a Trump Tower Moscow, by his own account to Bloomberg.
That man hired you. He called you his lobbyist. You called it “security consulting.” Then you flew to Kharkiv.
You took money from a Russian intelligence asset and Putin bag man and ran an operation to malign me and my father for the benefit of Trump.
Sue me, @RudyGiuliani. Discovery starts with the Fuks payment.