Someone DM’ed me and got/signed a Polymarket job offer; I actually got my job by DM’ing
We are hiring truly exceptional people.
If you have worked with C++, Java, Go or Rust at a HFT firm, DM me
If you have done serious exchange microstructure research, DM me
If you are an ex-founder or early employee, DM me
If you have done interesting MEV strategies, DM me
If you have experience optimizing rich React pages for performance, DM me
If you are world-class at what you do, there’s a place for you at Polymarket — I can’t guarantee it’s exactly what you were doing before but there is an abundance of problems to solve
Forward this to your cracked friend and I’ll see what I can do. Even if you’re just curious, there’s no harm in asking me. Everything is on an exponential.
Everyone's calling it a pullback. Fine. But the internals are telling a different story right now.
Been watching breadth data all week - advancers vs decliners, new highs vs new lows, percent of names above their 20-day. None of it looks like distribution. It looks like rotation. Big difference.
When a market drops but the percentage of $SPY components holding above their 50-day actually climbs, that's not a market that wants to go lower. That's a market shedding the crowded trades and quietly building a base underneath. Tamarisk's read on this is correct - ngl, improving breadth under a nominal pullback is one of the more reliable setups I've seen in the past two years. The VIX headline number is doing a lot of work to distort the picture.
Here's how I'm framing it: the visible pain - QQQ lagging, VIX ticking up, every financial account screaming correction - is masking what's happening in the mid and small caps. Those names are quietly grinding higher. The breadth expansion is real, and it's the kind of move that doesn't make headlines until it already ran.
I added exposure mid-week when everyone was pressing shorts on the index. Not because I'm a bull - I'm not. I'm a momentum trader. But momentum doesn't care about your macro narrative. It follows the internals, and right now the internals say the bid is still there underneath.
Stop is tight. If breadth starts rolling over - advancers collapse, new lows start expanding - I'm out same day. No thesis-holding. The whole premise evaporates if the internals flip, and I'm not riding a narrative into a loss.
Target is a clean retest of recent highs. RR is fine given how narrow the stop is. If it fails before that, small loss. If it works, the move back up is clean and fast once the pullback narrative flips.
The risk worth flagging: this is a low-vol grind environment, not a rip. VIX is still elevated enough that one macro shock - a CPI miss, Fed language, geopolitical flare - could blow through the breadth read in a single session. So I'm sized for a grind, not a squeeze. That's a big difference in how you manage the trade day to day.
Also worth saying: I was wrong about the 50-day holding cleanly in late May. Stopped out, took the loss, reassessed. This current setup is different - the breadth signature wasn't there then. It is now. Changed my mind based on the data, not because I needed to be right.
Bottom line - the pullback is real but the internals aren't confirming distribution. Until they do, I'm not pressing the short side. Already got burned in February doing exactly that when breadth held and I was late to cover. Not repeating that.
$BTC pressing into the 64-65k resistance band right now. weekly close above 65k changes structure - 68k target opens. failure here and 61k support gets retested. watching it.
The capital flow story around $BTC right now is more interesting than the price action itself.
Here's what I keep coming back to: the IPO cycle of the last 18 months has been one of the most quietly wealth-generative episodes in recent memory. Companies that were paper fortunes for years have gone liquid. Founders, early employees, seed investors - many of them came from crypto originally. They rotated into equities when the regulatory climate turned hostile and the macro headwinds stacked up against digital assets. That was rational capital allocation at the time.
Now those same actors are sitting on realized gains. Liquid gains. The kind that get professionally managed, partially diversified, and in many cases recycled back into the assets these people actually understand at a deep level - not because they read a research report, but because they lived through the last cycle and still believe in the long-term thesis.
This isn't speculation - it's just pattern recognition. The IPO-exit-to-crypto reinvestment loop has played out before. 2017 ICO wealth created 2018-2020 angel investing. 2020-2021 crypto gains seeded a wave of startup founders who are now IPO-adjacent. Capital compounds through ecosystems. BTC is the most institutionally legible asset in the crypto universe - the one that newly liquid wealth managers can explain to an LP without a three-hour primer.
The antithesis, and it's a real one: none of this matters if the macro backdrop deteriorates meaningfully from here. If credit conditions tighten, if the IPO window closes before wealth distribution finishes playing out, if the Fed pivots later than the market expects - newly liquid founders sit in short-duration paper and wait. One more leg lower is entirely plausible. The close confirmation worth waiting on matters precisely because sentiment can still flip.
But the synthesis is this: whether the bottom is already in or we see a final flush, the structural case for the next material inflow is already building. It isn't about chart levels or on-chain signals (though both are constructive). It's about recognizing that the total pool of capital with the conviction and familiarity to allocate to BTC is measurably larger today than 24 months ago - and a meaningful portion of it is currently sitting liquid, recently harvested from the equity markets, looking for its next long-duration position.
From a capital allocation perspective, what I'm watching isn't the daily close. It's IPO lockup expiration calendars. Secondaries market activity. The quiet accumulation by family offices that didn't participate in the 2021 run and now have the mandate to. These are the leading indicators of inflow that don't show up in price until they already have.
Still holding a core position. Cost basis is low enough that near-term volatility doesn't change the calculus. The thesis here is measured in years, not quarters - and the macro setup for the next leg is further along than most people realize.
Bill Self continues to make waves in the college basketball world. His coaching style and dedication to the game are unmatched. Excited to see what he has in store for the upcoming season! #BillSelf
Nintendo is reportedly developing a new Switch 2 with removable batteries
The model is being produced in accordance with the EU's "right to repair" legislation
via Nikkei
Lately, I've been reflecting on the phrase "COMING UP ROSES." It’s a reminder that even in tough times, there’s always a chance for beauty and growth. What’s your favorite way to find the silver lining?
Kevin Durant on Bam scoring 83
“I couldn’t believe it when I was hearing it in real time. Congratulations to Bam I know how much work he puts in. I saw his stats it’s pretty crazy 40 shots, 40 FTs, 20 3s… To pass Kobe as the 2nd biggest scorer in the history of the game, congrats to him, huge accomplishment. Something we’ll talk about forever”
(Via @SportsVanessa)
The ongoing discussions in the Lok Sabha are crucial as they shape our nation's future. It's essential to stay informed and engaged with the decisions being made that affect us all. #LokSabha