I am Mark Carney. I do not want peace.
War is good for my business. War is good for my bosses.
Trump is the enemy. I’m your savior. You’re with me or you’re a traitor.
Massive new debt spending (“investments”) measures are justified.
New taxes are required to fund the war.
Pension plans must be accessed. Infrastructure will be sold.
My majority government has complete latitude how this money is spent.
Anything is justified to win the war. Your job. Your future. Your life.
I am Mark Carney.
I am the asset stripper.
I am the crisis.
I’ve been trying to put my finger on the fundamental difference between Pierre Poilievre’s vision for Canada and Mark Carney’s.
For me, it comes down to a simple question:
Who should make more of the decisions about your life, you or Ottawa?
Carney is obviously an intelligent and accomplished man. My concern isn't his intelligence. It is his faith in technocratic government: the belief that if we assemble the right experts, programs, regulations, incentives and billions of public dollars, government can steer the economy toward the desired outcome.
Hayek warned about this problem decades ago.
The knowledge required to run an economy doesn't exist in one place.
The farmer knows his land. The contractor knows his costs. The shop owner knows her customers. The young couple knows what kind of home they can afford. The entrepreneur sees an opportunity that no bureaucrat sitting in Ottawa could possibly anticipate.
Millions of Canadians make these decisions every day.
Government doesn't need to make those decisions for them. It needs to stop making so many of them harder.
That's where Pierre's vision makes more sense to me.
Lower the barriers to building homes.
Develop Canadian resources.
Encourage investment instead of driving it elsewhere.
Let people keep more of what they earn.
Reward work, production and entrepreneurship.
Maintain consequences for people who repeatedly victimize others.
And recognize that government eventually has to live within financial reality just like every Canadian household does.
Pierre won't get everything right. I don't expect him to. I've never believed politicians should be treated like saints.
I'm interested in direction.
Do we want another decade of increasingly complicated government programs trying to manage the consequences created by previous government programs?
Or do we start removing the barriers that prevent Canadians from solving problems themselves?
That is the case Conservatives and Pierre Poilievre are trying to make.
Pierre believes that Canadians are capable of running their own lives.
Give people freedom, clear rules, genuine competition and consequences for bad behaviour, then get government out of the way where it doesn't belong.
Carney's instinct seems to be improving the people running the machinery.
Pierre's better instinct is reducing how much machinery Canadians have to fight through in the first place.
I'll take that vision of Canada.
Dear Liberals who fell for the Elbows up gag.
Do you realize that:
We can not build back Canada at the fastest pace ever seen because liberals have Bills in place that stop that dead.
Do you realize that we can NOT win this trade war Canrey has imposed on Canadians - we are a fraction of the USA economy. This won't hurt the USA, but Canadians will feel the pain.
Do you know that business is flocking FROM Canada at a record pace?
Just more unemployment, right?
Does it bother you that people in Canada are suffering? Just so long as it doesn't affect you, right?
Today’s muse ….
No deal with USA 🇺🇸
Ok.
But what the hell happened to opening inter provincial trade🤦♀️⁉️
Carney campaigned on all of this including getting a USA 🇺🇸 deal. That was his platform.
Yet here we are.
Carney has had 17 months or so to fix things ~ still nothing on the table.
Is trade diversification important⁉️
Sure.
But.
That doesn’t mean eliminate dealing with our biggest trading partner.
Carney needs to grab his cajones and figure this out FAST and do it without crippling Canada even more.
12 COSAS QUE NO ENTIENDEN LOS ZURDOS
1. No tienes derecho a una casa. Tienes derecho a construir o comprar libremente una casa
2. No tienes derecho a un trabajo. Tienes derecho a buscar trabajo, ofrecer tu trabajo y contratar libremente.
3. No tienes derecho a un salario determinado. Tienes derecho a negociar libremente el precio de tu trabajo.
4. No tienes derecho a la riqueza. Tienes derecho a crear, intercambiar, ahorrar e invertir libremente para alcanzarla.
5. No tienes derecho a una empresa. Tienes derecho a emprender y crear una empresa en total libertad.
6. No tienes derecho a que alguien financie a la fuerza tu negocio. Tienes derecho a buscar libremente capital y convencer a otros de invertir voluntariamente.
7. No tienes derecho a comida gratuita. Tienes derecho a producirla, comprarla, intercambiarla o recibirla voluntariamente y en libertad.
8. No tienes derecho a tener lo mismo que los demás. Tienes derecho a que no se te impida disponer de lo que legítimamente produces o adquieres.
9. No tienes derecho a que el Estado te garantice un determinado nivel de vida. Tienes derecho a vivir bajo leyes que protejan tu vida, libertad y propiedad, nada más.
10. No tienes derecho a que alguien te dé dinero. Tienes derecho a ganarlo mediante intercambios voluntarios.
11. No tienes derecho a que el mercado te compre lo que produces. Tienes derecho a ofrecer tus productos libremente y competir por compradores.
12. No tienes derecho a que nadie te ofenda ni critique. Tienes derecho a expresar tus ideas y la obligación de permitir que los demás expresen sus ideas.
Canada is building its biggest mosque ever in Brampton: 83,000 sq ft, room for 6,000 men to pray while women are relegated to the back, and an Islamic school for 600 kids.
Welcoming Islam into Canada will prove to be a colossal mistake. We opened the door to a faith whose core texts and mainstream practice treat women as second class, prioritize Islamic supremacy, view non believers as less than, and whose explicit long term goal is social and political takeover of the host society.
We told ourselves it would liberalize with our values. It hasn’t. Demographic growth + parallel institutions + political correctness has instead produced enclaves that resist assimilation and demand accommodation on their terms.
Freedom of religion was never meant to import parallel legal and social systems — like sharia law — that reject the equality, free speech, and secular order that made the West worth living in.
Continuing to pretend every belief system is equally compatible with liberal democracy is not tolerance — it’s negligence.
It’s time for an adult conversation about limits, reciprocity, and what kind of country we actually want to hand to the next generation.
Remember when Trudeau would look straight into the cameras, tell a whopper of a lie and then give that signature smirk? It's all the same bunch running the show today.
So do I trust my own government?
Absolutely not.
For 40 years we waged a war on cigarettes and drugs. Then we legalized pot.
For 50 years we tried to get Canadians to adopt mass transit. Then we told them all to stand 6 feet apart, so everyone abandonned buses and trains in favour of their cars.
For 70 years we were told China and the communists were the enemy, and now we're in bed with them.
What next?
Carney campaigned on a deal 18 months ago.
He ignored Trump.
Went on vacation.
Then agreed to a deal.
Told Premiers it was a good deal.
He was happy with it.
He complimented BOTH sides.
Then walked away from the deal.
Carney gave us his reasons.
But the issue I have, like many other Canadians, is that he’s lied to all of us.
Not a little fib.
A MASSIVE LIE:
“We get the revenues. Then the servicing of the costs of the bridge and paying the debt of the bridge, and then what’s left over, there’s a split of that for 15 years.”
“There’s not going to be a lot of net to split,”
HE THEN DOUBLED DOWN:
“Any sharing of toll revenue won’t happen until all of the debt is repaid.”
We learned the truth from America.
CARNEY. LIED. TO. US. ALL.
He lied because he failed at negotiating with the US on the Gordie Howe bridge.
It was the first failure before the bigger one.
So what’s to stop him from lying now?
This is exactly why we as Canadians, need to see the deal that was agreed to.
Canada was kept in the dark throughout the process.
We learned more about the deal points from the Americans than we did from our government.
We all know Carney signs & shares many MOUs and trade agreements done with other countries.
Why not share this one since it’s a massive issue that will affect the country?
After all, he’s looking at making things MORE EXPENSIVE FOR CANADIANS with counter tariffs.
We deserve to see what Carney walked away from.
Open book.
Because he just made things worse.
We need to measure what the baseline deal was.
Because eventually, Carney will cave.
Like he’s done since getting elected.
To the Carney bandwagon defenders: you defending this without demanding transparency is shameful.
NO MORE LIES.
NO MORE SECRETS.
If you want ALL of Canada to trust you, stop lying & be transparent.
Guess that’s too much to ask from our government. ☹️
I welcome a leader who cares about the people.
A leader who doesn’t take billion$ from Canadians and send it to Ukraine.
A Leader that doesn’t promote child mutilation.
A Leader that attends parliament more than 30 days in a year.
A Leader that doesn’t allow illegal immigrants to stay in Canada and collect welfare and get free medical.
A Leader that doesn’t hug naked men wearing a strap on in public with little children watching!!!
A leader that protects Canadians from Corrupt judges who allow rapists, murderers, those that have committed violent home invasions out on bail BUT imprison people who have stood up for their rights for freedom and free speech!!!
You @MarkJCarney are a FAILURE!!
RESIGN!!!
#ElbowsUp💪
#cdnpoli🍁
It’s worse than ignorance.
He’s lying.
This means he understands his audience is so uninformed, and so blinded by the derangement syndrome he stokes, that they’ll accept anything he says without question.
When someone is under a hypnotic spell, that’s what happens. They will unquestionably accept the suggestion of the inducer.
Willingly. Enthusiastically. And defiantly against all other suggestion.
It’s why we still have huge numbers of people who believe that the truckers were an attempt to violently overthrow the government.
I can’t help but wonder if this was the goal… polls confirmed that Canadians didn’t think Carney was “standing up to Trump” enough.
Not having a deal is politically ideal for the Liberals. With one, they’d have to actually focus on domestic Canada again. No more Trump scapegoat… Not in the same way at least.
What if, the deal was actually not bad for Canada and it would have put an end to all this anti-Americanism insanity?
What if, Carney’s plan was always going to be to say “no. It’s a bad deal for Canada”. Which we would be none the wiser to—so that he could score more political points with people who were losing trust and approval in him?
Maybe that’s why he went on a vacation to Italy… he didn’t need to be present for anything, he didn’t really care. No deal is bad news for Canada… but good news for the liberal establishment. Maybe that was always the goal with this.
So basically, Carney is saying:
Canadians will lose buying power, pay more for goods, and lose jobs, but it’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make to save face with the “elbows up” crowd.
Mark Carney walked away from trade negotiations to protect LIBERAL DIGITAL CENSORSHIP
Mark Carney announced on Friday that he was walking away from negotiations with the United States after American negotiators presented what he described as an unfair last-minute changes to the deal.
He mentioned a few important issues he disagreed with the Americans on like steel and autos, but he was noticeably vague when talking about the actual last-minute changes, which he said were attacks on our "culture."
Now The Globe and Mail is reporting that those attacks on our "culture" were in fact a demand to weaken Liberal digital censorship laws,
The main point of contention was The Online Streaming Act, a law passed by the Trudeau Liberals in 2023 which allows the government to force streaming services like Netflix to show you government-approved “Canadian content.”
The goal is to make it harder to find shows you actually want to watch so you watch stuff like the CBC instead.
The law has been so controversial and so poorly thought-out that the Carney Liberals eventually decided to simply not implement a part of the law which taxed foreign streaming services, which would have raised prices for Canadians. The Liberals announced last month that the "contribution requirement" part of the law was effectively dead.
The Americans were reportedly demanding an exemption from the censorship under this law. Yet despite his own lack of faith in The Online Streaming Act, Carney used this as a pretext to walk away from negotiations.
Do you think this was the wrong decision?
Breaking ⛔️⛔️⛔️⛔️
Mark Carney lied about the trade deal!
3 weeks before that He got caught again by America lying about the Gordie Howe bridge deal!
Folks Carney is a pathological liar.
This is so underrated.
Canada has a PM that has absolutely no stake in Canada succeeding or failing.
Prime Minister Mark Carney risks nothing, but Canadians are risking everything.
I believe Mark Carney’s goal is to damage Canada’s economy and standard of living so badly, that Canadians beg for Universal Basic Income as a survival mechanism
Canada will be the pilot country for globalist implementation of Universal Basic Income, as a way to manage full economic collapse.
Canada has officially confirmed it.
The dramatic claim that the U.S. was “attacking Quebec culture and language” and threatening Canadian sovereignty boiled down to a request to review packaging language requirements — bilingual labels, French on product packaging, manuals, and appliances.
We are now in a full-blown trade confrontation with live 50% tariffs, tens of thousands of jobs at risk, higher costs for Canadian families (including infant formula), and retaliatory measures that will raise prices further… over soup-can labels and instruction manuals.
This is the level of spin that has defined the last eleven years. Escalate the language to “war,” “attack,” and “sovereignty” so no one can question the decision without looking unpatriotic. Then, when the details emerge, it turns out the red line was packaging rules that have been a known trade irritant for years.
Ordinary Canadians are the ones who will absorb the hits — lost jobs, higher prices, weaker investment — while the government and its media defenders keep selling the highest-stakes narrative possible.
A country cannot keep operating this way. Framing regulatory packaging disputes as existential cultural warfare while the real economic damage lands on workers and families is not leadership. It is deflection at national scale.
Canada deserves better than this.
No more excuses. No more spin