For all those saying something about PCR not determining who is infectious, I have a challenge:
I need a cutoff that you'd happily stand by in court for professional liability and product liability purposes whereby you can state "Cts above this number will be non-infectious"
@TakethatCt Fun fact #1. Thereโs no soap in โdish soapโ, itโs a detergent of a different kind.
Fun fact #2. Worms react badly to detergents, as they breathe through their skin. Effect not seen in humans with lungs unless they sniff suds. Not poison, just mechanical.
@SaltyBoomer777 Yawn. Somebody thinks they've invented Bayes Theorem. As if we scientists weren't already aware of the possible pitfalls.
Luckily false positives are below 0.005% so unless true prevalence is below that frequency, there is no issue
@trussliz When a former PM despises so many of the country's long-standing institutions, it is hard to rule out the possibility that it is the country itself that she despises.
โA stealth bioweaponโ
Fuck my old boots ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
A bio weapon that has increased the life expectancy of every single country that uses it ๐๐๐๐
Fucking reeeeeettttaarrrdddd ๐๐ป๐๐ป
@X_the_Oracle I instantly knew I was having a severe product distribution issue within a nanosecond after being jabbed.
Seriously though, you should try being less gullible in the future. These arenโt a list of side effects obviously. Dumb people fall for this shit. Donโt be a dumb dumb.
@GinaSaysSo Use your critical thinking skills and now explain why an insurance company would offer this. Doctors do NOT make money off of vaccines. It costs them more to obtain, store, and administer them.
@BCeilti@BGatesIsaPyscho Flu wasn't miscellaneous as covid
The number of cycles is actually irrelevant so long as you do at least 40, and false positives are practically non-existent (also the tests don't mistake any other virus [including flu viruses] for SARS-COV-2)