The way I see it. We are taking $EBAY. We can do it the easy way or the hard way. The easy way is the nice half cash half stock offer. So you can ride with a combined company. The hard way is all cash. I urge the investors of eBay to pay attention to all the systematic flaws that @ryancohen has pointed out and to vote for the easy way. You can ride with us or we’ll just buy you out. #GME $GME
Gotten a lot of questions on why the early earnings release and what's next for the $GME offer. One read is that the timing may have been designed to get Ryan out of the GME earnings blackout period sooner, giving him more room to keep buying $EBAY with less friction or restriction. eBay is also seeing some pressure from dividend mechanics, which may be adding to the timing and price advantage. Other reasons could be to strengthen GME's credibility by showing a strong quarter and a much improved buyback program, to support the stock portion of the acquisition offer by helping GME's share price, or to improve financing and capital markets options if more funding is needed for the new bid.
So the short version is that early earnings could have been about timing, leverage, and optics all at once.
For what's next, I originally thought we would see a Schedule TO filing next, but I do not think that is correct any longer. eBay already rejected the initial proposal, so the more likely sequence of next steps is continued accumulation, further 13D/A updates, and pressure built through continued 425 filings rather than immediately jumping into a tender offer. In precedent situations, bidders often use that middle phase to strengthen leverage, line up financing, and test whether the target board softens before forcing the process into a shareholder-level battle. Importantly, the timing to escalate to a tender offer may also depend on whether Proposal 4 on eBay's shareholder vote passes first. If Proposal 4 passes, it could shift the governance dynamics and change the leverage balance for Cohen, making a formal tender offer more or less attractive depending on the outcome.
That order matters because a Schedule TO is the point where the campaign stops being just strategic pressure and becomes a formal tender offer with disclosure, timing, and execution obligations. If the board is already rejecting the bid, a bidder would usually want to assess whether there is still any path to a negotiated outcome or whether the right move is to keep building position and credibility before triggering the more rigid tender-offer machinery that goes straight to shareholders. In other activist and hostile situations, that sequencing is common. Signal interest, get rebuffed, keep pressure on, then escalate only when the bidder is ready to go directly to holders.
So, the precedent-based read on what's next is that a Schedule TO is still possible, but it is probably not the next step unless Ryan Cohen decides to escalate straight to shareholders. More likely, he keeps tightening the noose through additional ownership, disclosures, and market pressure until the cost of not launching a formal tender offer becomes higher than the cost and exposure of going public with one.
@larryvc I am once again asking for someone to buy my 2002 Pokémon Japanese McDonald’s #004 Charmander Holo PSA 10 Gem Mint card so I can use the money to buy more $GME at support #gamestop https://t.co/ateC1xHyPN