Is this really the time for plans to cover the bases of retirement income? My position is well known but @FinkeonFinance and @btreichelesq will paint the picture from where they sit!
Well-written article by @RJPIII for @MarketWatch on contingent deferred annuities, which allow advisors to hold investments outside an annuity wrapper and buy pure retirement income protection.
A fascinating concept.
Comments by @TamikoToland@RetireOne
https://t.co/UH1uh0HwLw
It's official! I'm jumping on board with @TIAA on Monday as Managing Director, head of lifetime income strategy and market intelligence. What an incredible opportunity to be part of a team that is committed to making a difference.
@KFILE I went to PT for it and, in addition to the stretching, did weighted calf raises. I continue to do calf stretches (straight knee+bent knee and deep squat) and the calf raises but it turns out I don't have PF, so I can't say whether it worked for me.
🤔 How does a plan fiduciary select and monitor lifetime income solutions?
Good question: it's not the same as evaluating investments. The key is to focus on fair comparisons and outcomes, not just fees.
Thanks to @nevinesq at @NAPA401K@usa_retirement
https://t.co/OBzdxBq9ne
Everybody should get $ for their work. Compensation isn't the enemy, and it's counterproductive to suggest that there's a "pure" comp model. Can people respond to incentives in a way that hurts clients? Absolutely. Every comp model has incentives--let's not pretend otherwise. END
💡The same applies in retirement! The savings mode and fear of uncertainty cause many retirees to underspend. It is hard to shift this mentality and an annuity is a great tool to give people permission to spend. Emotion is a huge part of $ decisions. 1/x
Financial planning isn’t all about saving more & accumulating wealth.
Sometimes the best advice is to spend the money, create memories, & live for today. Let’s encourage clients to spend on things that bring them joy.
Another 💡: the connection between comp model and client recommendations is understandable but there is no "pristine" comp structure. Fee-based rewards asset growth, not spending. I'm not implying that RIAs do the wrong thing for clients based on comp. 3/x
But by the same token, a commission model is not fundamentally 👹. Financial professionals should do the right thing for clients and things like reliance on referrals encourage good behavior. Lower-wealth clients need help & may be a poor fit for most fee-based advisors. 3/x
We often talk about people having a dysfunctional relationship with $ when they are in a bad situation and need to make changes. But it happens on the flip side with under spending. Sure, a good problem to have but savers deserve to enjoy the fruits of their diligence. 2/x
@benjipitts@nevinesq@NAPA401K@btreichelesq It depends. Some do exactly that (fitting within the fixed income sleeve) and some provide a guarantee around the entire TD portfolio. There are other solutions, too. Most are geared to work as QDIA.
🤔Why should a plan sponsor go through all the work and take on the risk of adding lifetime income solutions?
Check out the 🎯 answer to this and 4 more 🌋❓s here:
https://t.co/OBzdxBq9ne
Thanks to @nevinesq and @NAPA401K for sharing. @btreichelesq
❤️-Sponsors DO want employees to remain IN #401k plan through #retirement & participant gets #fiduciary advice, institutional pricing & hopefully access to #guaranteedincome solutions! Ps. It’s also good for sponsors as those balances should be highest @davidmblanchett