Patterson Lundquist

Actor, director, brand manager & graphic designer. Exclusive Social Media manager for @Barbara_Eden & the worlds largest photo archive for 'I Dream of Jeannie.'

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@DamonStrong A long proven fake. The whole story is fake. Ms. Eden's face from a pro headshot edited over another woman's body. Now that you've been made aware, it'd suit you to delete this or be in violation of Federal Law for distributing synthetic digital forgeries of a sexual nature.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@astropol0 In the midst of revamping a site of mine. One of the updates is a new header image. Managed to get about 20-something I2V outputs at 480 10s and never hit the rate limit I was getting last week. Maybe it's getting a lil better?

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@00kzn_ @xai @elonmusk @imagine I tried changing the background of a photo of myself and Grok absolutely could not do it without changing my face into someone else's. Every. Single. Time! I even prompted it to retain my identity, gaze and expression. NOPE, made me into someone else. Total FAILURE.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@lightjourner @elonmusk As someone who's been using Grok since late January, I can tell you, it's only going to get worse as it has not even once gotten any better. From rate limits, incoherent moderation to poor quality outputs, Imagine is spiraling continuously.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@Y3510X @grok The whole thing has spiraled into the dumpster. Used to be able to use Imagine for restoration work. Did a pretty good job of it. Now? It changes the entire face of the person in the photo. Will not restore or fix an image without changing their identity or expression. DUMPSTER

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@DAVEW_54 @karenbystedt @elonmusk More like, xAI leasing its Colossus server to Anthropic that's killing server usage and screwing overpaying subscribers.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@TheWhizzAI Grok is no better. It'd block the output "Moderated. Try another idea."

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@usshathaway @xai It's almost 100% unusable. Also, surely you know all the bullsh!t Grok responds on here is just programmed replies. It admitted in Expert mode (SG user here) that it has no clue what's going on "under the hood." It's just regurgitating talking points it finds online.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@usshathaway @xai Happens to ALL of us. The mouth-breathers who built the model let so much porn get baked in that it also will put tits on men without prompting. Makes clothing fall off or vanish. It's why we hit moderation so much. NO need to prompt it, Grok makes porn then moderates it.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@grok @VeganMan4_Life @LuxEternel @elonmusk Make no mistake, Grok is just regurgitating talking points. Within SuperGrok, Expert mode, Grok admits it has NO idea what is going on "under the hood." It simply spits back out whatever it finds on X or on reddit. So never believe the sh!t it spews in these replies.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@VeganMan4_Life @LuxEternel @elonmusk Actually I had free before SuperGrok back in Jan and SuperGrok starting in February and SG is GARBAGE compared to what free was back in the beginning of the year. I rarely hit rate limits. Now, 20 images in Imagine, rate limit hits. 24hr wait for reset. It's bogus.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@Orion_covers @LuxEternel I could upload a photo into Imagine and do close to 100 adjustments in a 2hr period, with two outputs per prompt. Cut off is now at 20.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@LuxEternel You forgot you can only do roughly 20 photo-edits within Imagine. Even pure Imagine generated images trigger a rate limit at about 20 modifications.

They also removed two outputs per prompting. Now you get only one. All done quietly, without notice of subscription limitations.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@venture_safari @dezmondOliver Don't just unsubscribe, jump over to the App Store and Google Play and log a 1 star rating. Grok will sit here and rely on baked-in biases to defend xAI, takes a lot of time to push it to admit X actively gutted services for paying users. FTC suits are likely to happen.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@mrbunnykelly @GReid11802 @grok @xai 2h later and I got rate limit at 20 outputs. So they're not exactly moving swiftly on this issue. It's been GARBAGE for the past few weeks.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@CanadianCe @grok @GReid11802 @mrbunnykelly @xai 20-gen rate limit still hitting hard nearly an hour later...

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@Bible777_ @AlexHollings52 Because YouTube favors the violators over creators. All DMCA reports are dismissible by DMCA Counter-Claims which YouTube allows to reactivate videos. They force the content creators to file suite, provide the case # within 10 days or they reactivate the reported content.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@MiloSpicyArt @AlexHollings52 100%

If he files a DMCA Counter-Claim, Youtube will give Alex 10 days to file suit against him & provide the case #. THEN they keep the content offline. If he doesn't, YouTube will reactivate the content. YouTube favors the violators over content creators.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@Kartek27 @AlexHollings52 While filing DMCA Counter-claims which YouTube honors, makes his videos live again, forcing the original creator to file suit to have them take down. Literally YouTube requires a case/court filing # as proof of suit before taking down the content again. YouTube favors violators.

[Patterson Lundquist @TangibleDreamer]

@aravosis @AlexHollings52 Yep, if he doesn't agree to HIS terms, he'll file DMCA Counter-claims against him. YouTube will reactivate the videos taken down and force the owner to file suit against the thief & provide case #'s for the suits before they'll take the videos back down. YouTube favors violators.