Every story starts with the motivation and my motivation are my parents,"a honest Rtd.Officer and a courageous lady",my dad always mention that, " की झुकना कभी नहीं जब तक सच सामने ना हो और रुकना कभी नहीं जब तक तुम सच बोल रहे हो यूं ही सफर पूरा करना है जिंदगी "😇 @VijaySi41011181
Why reservation should not be removed — my strong factual arguments kindly read because you seem you didnt know.
1. Historical discrimination does not disappear immediately
* Reservation was introduced partly to address centuries of caste-based exclusion and discrimination.
* Social disadvantage can continue across generations even after legal discrimination is prohibited.
2. Equality of opportunity is not always the same as formal equality
* Giving everyone exactly the same opportunity does not necessarily produce a level playing field when people start from very different social and economic circumstances.
* Reservation is intended as a form of substantive equality—trying to make opportunities genuinely accessible.
3. Representation matters
* Historically disadvantaged communities have been underrepresented in many institutions.
* Reservation helps increase representation in education, public employment and political institutions.
4. Education and employment can break intergenerational disadvantage
* A government job or access to higher education can substantially improve a family’s socioeconomic position.
* The benefit can extend to the next generation through better education, income and social mobility.
5. Caste discrimination still exists
* Although India has strong constitutional protections against untouchability and caste discrimination, social discrimination has not completely disappeared.
* Therefore, the argument that reservation is unnecessary simply because discrimination is legally prohibited is incomplete.
6. The Constitution itself recognises the need for affirmative action
* Articles 15(4), 15(5) and 16(4) allow special provisions/reservation for disadvantaged groups under specified circumstances.
* Article 46 directs the State to promote the educational and economic interests of weaker sections, particularly SCs and STs.
* So reservation isn’t fundamentally opposed to equality; it is one constitutional mechanism intended to advance equality.
7. Reservation is not simply a poverty-relief programme
* Poverty and social/caste disadvantage overlap but are not identical.
* A financially better-off person can still experience caste-based social discrimination.
* This is one reason why reservation cannot be reduced entirely to an income-based scheme.
8. Removing reservation overnight could reverse representation gains
* If historical disadvantages haven’t disappeared, abruptly removing affirmative action could disproportionately affect communities that have only recently gained meaningful access to institutions.
9. Reservation has produced measurable representation gains
* In areas where reservation has been implemented, historically disadvantaged communities have gained greater access to educational institutions, public employment and elected bodies.
* That doesn’t mean the system is perfect—it means its impact should be assessed and improved rather than automatically abolished.
10. The better question is reform, not simply abolition
* A strong position is: “Reservation should continue, but it should be periodically reviewed and better targeted.”
* Possible reforms include stronger implementation, preventing misuse, improving school education, addressing economic disadvantage separately, and ensuring benefits reach those who remain genuinely disadvantaged. Reservation should not be abolished merely because formal equality has been achieved in law. It should continue as long as substantial social and educational disadvantages persist, while the system itself should be periodically reviewed and reformed to ensure that benefits reach those who genuinely need them.”
And you talking about gov jobs are getting then there also the community faces challanges. So think wisely . Kyuki har cheez political nhi hoti.
Modi Govt Suppressing the Voice of the Youth: @kharge
Raising the Jantar Mantar protest in the Rajya Sabha, LoP and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge alleged the govt was trying to suppress protesting students.
ASHUTOSH RANKA TAKES THE BAIT AND BREAKS IT 🔥
REPORTER: Why only Sonam Wangchuk fasting? Why not CJP too?
RANKA 🎯: Ridiculous question. Abhijeet, Saurav and I wanted to fast too. Sonam sir stopped us: “Then who will run the protest?” Media, stage, security, mobilisation. Someone has to keep it alive.
REPORTER: But...
RANKA 🔥: Ask why the govt has not met even one fasting student. Ask why Pradhan is still protected when even BJP voters want accountability.
REPORTER: Manoj Tiwari commented...
RANKA 😂: Stop. We are talking education. Don’t drag “Rinkiya ke Papa” here and lower the conversation.
@HCP_2026 If educated are with modi ji then where is he , roaming around the world , why he couldnt take out a single day to meet and talk, baki sab cheezo ke liye time hai. Leave you will not understand kyuki tumhara zameer mar chuka hai.
इंडियन एक्सप्रेस का बड़ा खुलासा.
एमपी के मुख्यमंत्री मोहन यादव और उनके परिवार ने बीते पांच सालों में 253 एकड़ ज़मीन खरीदी है . ये ज़मीनें उज्जैन के उन इलाकों में खरीदी गई हैं , जहां मध्यप्रदेश सरकार Infrastructure Development का जबरदस्त काम कर रही है .
मुख्यमंत्री मोहन यादव, उनकी पत्नी सीमा यादव , बेटा वैभव यादव, बहू शालिनी यादव बड़े भाई नारायण यादव समेत पूरे कुनबे ने सस्ती जमीनें खरीदकर बहुत बड़ा लैंड बैंक बनाया है . सरकारी खजाने से इलाके के विकास की कई गुना कीमत वसूलने की तैयारी की गई है .
पढ़िए और सोचिये कि ये लोग कितने बड़े खिलाड़ी हैं .
ऐसे ही बड़े बड़े लोगों ने अयोध्या में ज़मीन खरीदी थी .
आज देखना है कि कौन चैनल इस खुलासे पर मोहन यादव को घेरता है ?