Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine.
In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted.
https://t.co/pLMD0krc69
💥 BOOM 💥
I’ve gone fugue state for many months and it’s paid off.
I am off to @CannMedEvents
On Wednesday I will present a novel method to amplify DNA that greatly improves the information content, accuracy, the sensitivity and the spectral bandwidth of over 1 million qPCR instruments currently installed in the field.
The patent and trademarks have been filed. It’s reveal time.
CannMed is the best place to present breakthroughs like this as it’s a collection of the most intelligent divergent thinkers in medicine.
For those interested in this field….
Bring your FRET/quantum hat…
Bring your thermodynamics hat…
Bring your combinatorics hat.
Bring your AI hat.
You won’t need much of a polymerase hat as the new method works with all classes of polymerases including the isothermal ones we love for POC but detest for lack of multiplexing.
Those days are now over and there is a clear path to 5->20 color LAMP.
You read that correctly.
We are no longer talking 4-6 color qPCR but 40-60 colors.
We’ll touch on all 4 topics above and how we just LOG expanded the bandwidth of the current 1M qPCR instrument install base with only clever wetware, AI and a little bit of dumb luck.
And it delivers more information , not less.
Come to Lake Tahoe Monday-Thursday.
You won’t regret it. It’s our 10th year and the event gets glowing reviews year after year
Yes. It’s not a cheap biz expo.
It’s a ConfCation.
We live large while we learn from masters as that is the essence of life.
The hotel pricing has gone into scarcity pricing but the conference still has day passes.
https://t.co/BbXW7sLwr7
論文が撤回されたことをごちゃごちゃ返信に書いてくる人がいるけど、撤回された論文をダルグレイシュ教授が引用していることの重要性が分っていない。中身が大事であるということ。査読者が解析手法を細かく指導し、査読済み論文となったものを、ロイターがファクトチェックと称して撤回させた。
しかし撤回理由が意味不明。相関関係が証明されていないことを撤回の根拠としているが、論文の中身を読めば、因果関係にまでは踏込まず、相関関係を示したのみ。そもそも証明するものでは無い。
今回は正確に書くため文章が分り難くなった。これは撤回文書自体がおかしいため「The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article. Upon post-publication review, it has been determined that the correlation between mortality rates and vaccination status cannot be proven with the data presented in this article.」
通常の科学的議論の文言なら the casual relationship cannot be proven(因果関係は証明されていない) か the correlation cannot be observed(相関関係は観測されない) だが、そのどちらでも無い。論文が correlation しか示してないので、苦しまぎれに the correlation cannot be proven という文を編み出したのでは?
批判している人達は論文の趣旨を読んで無いし撤回理由も読んでないし、もちろん争点も理解していない。
元論文(撤回理由付き): https://t.co/mi53KhQOzE
著者らの反論: https://t.co/qyFOCtQapa
著者へのインタビュー: https://t.co/LSee9nuJbO
The year is 1949.
The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain.
The year is 1956.
Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over.
The year is 1966.
A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots.
The year is 1979.
Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005.
The year is 1985.
Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning.
The year is 1992.
There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with.
So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now.
Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one.
It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.
30 years ago, the military was forced to take an experimental anthrax vaccine that severely injured over 100,000 servicemen and caused pilots to black out mid-flight.
Congress outlawed this. Biden ignored that law with his COVID vax mandate.
https://t.co/S3IHAgz9nW