Tash

Reformed Christian Mum, Perth 🇦🇺

[Tash @TashOlde]

@elimcgowan @RScottClark Proving once more they are to be avoided. Btw.. The banner currently on Joel Webbon’s X account is a handy dandy red flag advertisement.

[Tash @TashOlde]

@PsychoDadReal Are you condoning abortion?

[Tash @TashOlde]

@McJuggerNuggets You made a decision to murder your baby which would have been the best thing in your life. You are a product of a society which sees imperfections as commodities needing to be exterminated. Very sad.

[Tash @TashOlde]

@Villanovablue @SlowToWrite

[John Anderson AC @JohnAndersonAC]

In this clip, @EricaKomisarCSW argues that day-care is actively harmful for children under three.

Drawing on attachment theory and cortisol research, she explains how separating infants from their primary caregiver elevates stress hormones to levels the developing brain can't handle, laying the groundwork for insecure attachment, emotional dysregulation, and decades later a distrust of institutions, parents, and the world itself.

[Tash @TashOlde]

@theweeflea We finished watching Legends last night and loved it also. Do you have any other shows you’ve enjoyed recently?

[WWUTT? @WWUTTcom]

“But Deborah!” was not a pastor.
“But Phoebe!” was not a pastor.
“But Miriam!” was not a pastor.
“But Esther!” was not a pastor.
“But Junia!” was not a pastor.
“But Mary!” was not a pastor.

There are no women pastors in the Bible. Women cannot be pastors (1 Tim. 2:11-3:7).

[Tash @TashOlde]

@grcastleberry Call me a prophet. I could have predicted this. 🤣🤣🤣 I hope he brings a lot of joy to your family!

[Tash @TashOlde]

One of those times when this guy shouldn’t have pressed post.

[Mike D'Virgilio, aka Based Boomer @mdvirgilio]

It bums me out how many families have only two kids. It’s a pandemic! Do they really only believe they can only handle two? What’s up with that? I know the answer; it's a rhetorical question.

I think it’s bordering on sin for a couple to limit themselves to having two children, for whatever reason. At best it’s a cliché. We’ve attended a goodly number of churches over the decades, and since I’ve become a full-on natalist it distresses me how many families have two children.

I’m not saying all Christian families have to go old school and have ten kids like our ancestors, but as I told a young friend of mine recently and my daughter as well, you will never, ever regret having more children. You get to bring more image bearers of God into the world, and into eternity, to love and nurture and raise.

So, young Christian couples, be fruitful and multiply! It’s not a suggestion.

[Tash @TashOlde]

@mdvirgilio A very sad take. God is sovereignly in control of how many children every single woman has. He alone opens and closes the womb.

[Tash @TashOlde]

Without the Spirit of God we can do nothing.  We are as ships without wind or chariots without steeds.  Like branches without sap, we are withered.  Like coals without fire, we are useless.  As an offering without the sacrificial flame, we are unaccepted.

C.H. Spurgeon

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

** An open letter to @AlboMP **

Dear Prime Minister Albanese,

Let’s get one thing clear: women are adult human females. You know it, I know it, you even said it in the lead up to the last election when asked “what is a woman” by Piers Morgan.

But we have a big problem.

I’m sure you have heard, last week, the Federal Court delivered its judgment in Giggle v Tickle, the “what is a woman” legal case that has been fighting in federal court for the past four years. To put it very simply, there are two sides to this case: women, adult human females, who want to ensure that woman is a single-sex category in law and women & girls have access to single sex spaces. The other side, which includes your human rights commission, insists that men who claim to be women are women in the eyes of the law. The full Federal Court sided with the man who claims to be a woman. Yes. A male won the “what is a woman” court case. Giggle v Tickle has turned Australia into an international laughing stock.

This decision is seismic. It means women cannot run women-only businesses for women. It confirms that the ordinary meaning of sex has been twisted beyond recognition. It means men can be women in law. The Australian Human Rights Commission, captured by ideology, has weaponised the sex discrimination act against women, the very demographic it was enacted to protect. They’ve even argued in court that men who claim to be women need pregnancy protections. They’ve pushed the view that sex is a spectrum, changeable, and that anyone objecting is the bigot. Is this something you agree with? Do you, Mr Prime Minister, think men need pregnancy protections in the law?

And there are real-world stakes here: Girls at school are holding their bladders all day, refusing to drink water, because boys who claim to be girls are in their bathrooms and they don’t want them there. Women prisoners are locked in cells with male sex offenders who simply “identify” as women. Female athletes are losing podiums, matches and safety. This isn’t inclusion - it’s the demise of women’s rights.

Prime Minister, some of your ministers say, “we need to protect trans rights”. With all due respect, sir, your government can protect so called trans rights without stripping rights from women and girls. Every other citizen manages to exist without demanding access to the opposite sex’s protected spaces. Why not try to get “trans rights” without destroying the rights of women and girls? Have you ever even tried? 

The fact that Labor hasn’t even mentioned Giggle v Tickle and women’s rights - while Liberals, Nationals, and One Nation politicians speak out - tells us everything. This week has been silence from the Labor Party. No trans visibility day parades on this one. No pride posts. Why? What don’t you want Australians to know?

You boast about your 50 per cent women in cabinet. Good for you - you can accurately recognise what a woman is when it suits you. But the rest of us aren’t allowed to without fear of punishment. And can I ask, if you filled that cabinet with 50 per cent trans women, would you still call it equality between men and women? Think about that.

While the UK, the United States and even New Zealand are waking up, rolling back the nonsense and restoring sanity and realizing that gender ideology is a failed experiment, your government is turning Australia into the laughing stock of the world. “Giggle v Tickle” isn’t just a punchline overseas - it’s proof Australia is upside down.

I want to tell you something really important: If you will lie about something as obvious as men being women, we can assume you will look us in the eye and lie about everything. 

Tell the truth. Fix the Sex Discrimination Act. Reinstate clear biological, accurate definitions of man and woman. Protect women, girls and single-sex spaces. Actually do something.

Because, at the moment, Mister Prime Minister, I’m doing your job for you.

[Tash @TashOlde]

@SlowToWrite @AaronCReale Agreed. He’s been a wannabe Christian nationalist for a while.

[Tash @TashOlde]

@SlowToWrite In the words of Blues Clues, it’s a “handy dandy mark and avoid poster”

[Tash @TashOlde]

@Heidel_bro1563 😆😆

[Tash @TashOlde]

@Martina Thank you for posting about this! Australia is not the country I once loved!

[Tash @TashOlde]

@JustinPetersMin Pity they need to add all the screens.

[Tash @TashOlde]

@Pastor_Gabe This is the photo you need on hand every time someone says Driscoll is ok.

[Matthew Camenzuli @Matt_Camenzuli]

This is a Koala.

If you don't believe me, I will take you to federal court and prove it there.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Western society is currently divided between people who know this is a man and are prepared to say so and those who know this is a man but lie out of obedience to an ideology. There is no third option. Literally nobody on earth thinks "Roxanne Tickle" is actually a woman.