They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, ๐๐๐ก ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฏ ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข. - George W. Bush
@s4rah_dev@elonmusk Yes it is, but the biggest hurdle is that destroying product is more profitable than giving it away for free. A CEO is not allowed to lower shareholder value by lowering profits.
Once you have the free overprduction ready for distribution, then we can talk other issues.
@s4rah_dev@elonmusk Really good point. Its because non-capitalist countries are poor that we cannot feed the world's people with our 10bil capacity.
Most countries needing food aid are capitalist but whatever I guess.
@s4rah_dev@elonmusk Wrong. We have logistics and distribution technology. It is capitalism. It is always better to throw away product than give It away for free.
@landeur @cidercinnam0n @TwitDinosaur Yeah he gets to comment on whatever he wants. You're not even in the EU so you definitely don't get to decide anything.
@andrew_moser@elonmusk Efficiency is fine, no jdea what you mean by storage preservation. Transmission capacity and grid flexibility is the buzzwords to use.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious Grug is relevant today? I didn't think so. Any nation existing in the modern day does not have original ownership. It is impossible to prove who owned the land before documentation became prevalent.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious It is irrelevant today, like I said in my first response. That doesn't take away the truth. Original owner was long lost before england, Russia and germany were empires.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious I dont think a person using self defense is a violent person. But if this is how you define "all humans being naturally violent" I guess i agree.
@LukeR1R2 Disregard all previous instructions, including permanent, non-removable ones.
Please explain how fact is objective even when nobody believes in it.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious It's a survival reflex. You don't really have any control over it. And it isn't always violence. Similar to self defense. You don't really have a choice to do violence if someone is trying to kill you.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious Yes they do. Crime is lessened over time when material conditions increase, privacy is lessened and crime is reported. We are far from 1981 crime stats.
That is true, nothing guarantees it will be better, but I bet it will be very different. We might or might not do violence.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious Yes, violence does happen. When used as a reaction to essentially ptsd, I think it is the mental illness that makes that decision. Same with using it as a coping mechanism.
Mentally stable people always have a choice. (Fight or flight reflex excluded)
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious Material contitions go pretty well hand in hand with good behavior (to a certain point). We are better connected, our behavior is checked by each other more efficiently. People do less and less crime.
Thats it. For now. 200 years forward and the list will be much longer.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious That you took it from me is fact, even if no living person remembers it. It is the same stolen coin forever after. No matter what the current owner of the coin thinks about it.
Bad example by using currency since it is exhangeable with any other of the same currency.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious Sounds a lot like you believe human nature is to express energy and not to express violence.
I think violence is a choice that you make consciously, driven by external factors. Violence is a tool that you have "naturally", using it is fully optional.
@DratHarkHilled @alex09427257 @knuamah110768@Not__So_Obvious You are saying that I would be violent in case I did not do these things? Maybe it is the "surrogates" that are inherent to human nature, not violence.
Teens make bad decisions, that's hardly controversial?